Poor Global Warming Fear mongers... Now what fake Science will Mutt Support

Its hilarious.....will the gullible pinheads ever get over it ?.....and the GW issue is only the tip of the iceberg....

They are so gullible on so many fronts its scary......these pinheads, that can be led around by the nose so easily, actually vote and

have an effect on all of our lives......today, its the Zimmerman case....tomorrow, who knows.
 
Last edited:
Superfreak said:
gotta admit... that stumped me too.
Click to expand...


My post was about the gullibility of the left, ie global warming.
That same gullibility was evident in this shooting in Fla.....ie....Zimmerman

Hispanic shooter is labeled as white......and believed for days and days even after it was known to be incorrect.....
Hispanic shooter, judged and convicted without any knowledge of the facts surrounding the event.....
Now the eye witness is ridiculed as the shooters friend, waiting to come forward because of needing time to create a story
The lefties jump to conclusions at the drop of a hat.....tell them what they want to hear
and they believe the story without a question....they are gullible if the story fits their biases.....

I can't believe I had to explain this....
 
bravo said:
My post was about the gullibility of the left, ie global warming.
That same gullibility was evident in this shooting in Fla.....ie....Zimmerman

Hispanic shooter is labeled as white......and believed for days and days even after it was known to be incorrect.....
Hispanic shooter, judged and convicted without any knowledge of the facts surrounding the event.....
Now the eye witness is ridiculed as the shooters friend, waiting to come forward because of needing time to create a story
The lefties jump to conclusions at the drop of a hat.....tell them what they want to hear
and they believe the story without a question....they are gullible if the story fits their biases.....

I can't believe I had to explain this....
Click to expand...

I'm glad you did.

Thank you - really.
 
bravo said:
My post was about the gullibility of the left, ie global warming.
That same gullibility was evident in this shooting in Fla.....ie....Zimmerman

Hispanic shooter is labeled as white......and believed for days and days even after it was known to be incorrect.....
Hispanic shooter, judged and convicted without any knowledge of the facts surrounding the event.....
Now the eye witness is ridiculed as the shooters friend, waiting to come forward because of needing time to create a story
The lefties jump to conclusions at the drop of a hat.....tell them what they want to hear
and they believe the story without a question....they are gullible if the story fits their biases.....

I can't believe I had to explain this....
Click to expand...

With all due respect bravo, it is night and day difference between global warming and the Zimmerman case imo. For starters many Republicans, including all the Presidential candidates but regular people as well, came out in defense of Trayvon based on the initial info given out. It wasn't like this was a Republican/Democrat divide from the beginning, nor is it even still today. The information in this story is still fluid so none of us really know it all right now.

I will state though I still do not understand why Zimmerman pursued and approached Trayvon Martin after he had already called 911.
 
A poll done yesterday showed that 73% of Americans think Zimmerman should be arrested.

I had no idea there were so many liberal pinheads in the country! The GOP is doomed...
 
cawacko said:
With all due respect bravo, it is night and day difference between global warming and the Zimmerman case imo. For starters many Republicans, including all the Presidential candidates but regular people as well, came out in defense of Trayvon based on the initial info given out. It wasn't like this was a Republican/Democrat divide from the beginning, nor is it even still today. The information in this story is still fluid so none of us really know it all right now.

I will state though I still do not understand why Zimmerman pursued and approached Trayvon Martin after he had already called 911.
Click to expand...

That is still the factor that takes away the self defense claim in my eyes. Nothing that has come to light has changed this fact. Had Zimmerman stayed in the car, Martin would be alive.

Whether Martin swung first or not, Zimmerman pursued Martin. Instigating the fight and then losing does not give you a self defense claim. We will never know what Martin 'thought/feared' with regards to Zimmerman's pursuit.
 
Superfreak said:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304636404577291352882984274.html
Click to expand...

So an opinion piece from the Wall Street Journal (no bias there lol) negates science?
Nice try SimpleFreak. From your article;

But as one can read at Andrew Revkin's New York Times blog, dotearth, "There is no evidence of any trend in the number of potent tornadoes (category F2 and up) over the past 50 years in the United States, even as global temperatures have risen markedly."

So which is it, the temps have risen markedly, or they didn't?
 
Rune said:
So an opinion piece from the Wall Street Journal (no bias there lol) negates science?
Nice try SimpleFreak. From your article;

But as one can read at Andrew Revkin's New York Times blog, dotearth, "There is no evidence of any trend in the number of potent tornadoes (category F2 and up) over the past 50 years in the United States, even as global temperatures have risen markedly."

So which is it, the temps have risen markedly, or they didn't?
Click to expand...

You do understand the difference between 50 years and 10 years do you not? Global temperatures did indeed rise. The point of the article is that there hasn't been any significant warming over the past 10+ years despite CO2 levels continuing to increase. If you also note, it is a physics professor that wrote that opinion piece, not some schmuck off the street.
 
Rune said:
So an opinion piece from the Wall Street Journal (no bias there lol) negates science?
Nice try SimpleFreak. From your article;

But as one can read at Andrew Revkin's New York Times blog, dotearth, "There is no evidence of any trend in the number of potent tornadoes (category F2 and up) over the past 50 years in the United States, even as global temperatures have risen markedly."

So which is it, the temps have risen markedly, or they didn't?
Click to expand...

As for 'SimpleFreak'... that is hands down the best anyone has come up with yet... well done...
 
Superfreak said:
You do understand the difference between 50 years and 10 years do you not? Global temperatures did indeed rise. The point of the article is that there hasn't been any significant warming over the past 10+ years despite CO2 levels continuing to increase. If you also note, it is a physics professor that wrote that opinion piece, not some schmuck off the street.
Click to expand...

You do understand the WSJ's need to make fossil fuels appear safe right?
By the way, did you go outside last week?
Physicists get pwned too you know.
 
Rune said:
You do understand the WSJ's need to make fossil fuels appear safe right?
By the way, did you go outside last week?
Physicists get pwned too you know.
Click to expand...

Is that a no? You don't know the difference between 50 years and ten years?

Nat gas is safe... and it is by far the best viable option for a replacement of oil. Electric is nowhere close.
Yes, I went outside this week... please tell me what that has to do with anything?
Yes, 'Scientists' get pwned by data all the time.... just look at the idiots supporting the global warming computer models. They get pwned almost daily.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top