Polling Palin

No, I am just saying, if Sarah Palin were not significant, if she were another Dan Quayle, you and your liberal buddies would have stopped talking about her on November 5th of last year, and most everyone would have forgotten about her by now. But that is clearly NOT the case, is it? We continue to see threads posted, and pinheads responding... breaking their necks to take a pot shot at Sarah Palin.... why? It simply doesn't make sense if Palin is not significant, if Palin doesn't matter anymore. What DOES make sense, is the liberal left senses how much potential danger this woman poses to liberalism and the liberal agenda, and they need to do everything they can to discredit her and impugn her integrity as much as possible, before she is able to wreak havoc on Liberalism.

Is Michael Jackson "significant"? Everyone is talking about him, too.

You always draw the wrong conclusions, using whatever logic works for you. Has it occurred to you that liberals still attack Palin not because they are terrified of her and view her as formidable, but because conservatives are completely enamored of her still?

I don't care who it is; if we on the left adored someone & gushed over them all day, you'd proabably start about a dozen threads a week bashing them. That's just how it is. It has nothing to do with how "formidable" someone is.

Frankly, when you & meme & Tutu & the rest keep asserting that we're so terrified of her, it's kind of funny....
 
Is Michael Jackson "significant"? Everyone is talking about him, too.

You always draw the wrong conclusions, using whatever logic works for you. Has it occurred to you that liberals still attack Palin not because they are terrified of her and view her as formidable, but because conservatives are completely enamored of her still?

I don't care who it is; if we on the left adored someone & gushed over them all day, you'd proabably start about a dozen threads a week bashing them. That's just how it is. It has nothing to do with how "formidable" someone is.

Frankly, when you & meme & Tutu & the rest keep asserting that we're so terrified of her, it's kind of funny....

Now I haven't started the first thread about Al Gore! I don't waste my time posting about someone who is politically insignificant. What is the point? When Bill Clinton was president, I posted all the time about Clinton and his policies, but once he left office, there was no need for me to post about Clinton. Yeah, I could keep a thread up everyday for the next 10 years, talking about what a deplorable president Clinton was, but I actually didn't think his fiscal domestic policies were that bad, and I said so. Once he was out of political power, and insignificant in American politics, it didn't matter if I gave him credit or bitched every day.

With Palin, I get your shtick! I understand what you are doing! You know that a grass-roots Palin campaign could spell danger for your ambitious liberal agenda, you've seen the crowds she draws, you've seen the polling data, and you know damn good and well, if you don't stop her, she will be political trouble. So you concoct this 'image' of Palin, and reinforce it at every opportunity, just to keep her in check... to ensure she isn't a future threat to your agenda. I completely understand what you are doing, and I can't say that I blame you, she does have the potential to set the political world on fire and change the game completely. What I detest is your LYING about it, and trying to implement this 'campaign of personal destruction', while maintaining she isn't important or significant. That defies any logic or reason, and there is nothing to make people believe you really aren't concerned with Palin, because your actions tell a totally different story.
 
Now I haven't started the first thread about Al Gore! I don't waste my time posting about someone who is politically insignificant. What is the point? When Bill Clinton was president, I posted all the time about Clinton and his policies, but once he left office, there was no need for me to post about Clinton. Yeah, I could keep a thread up everyday for the next 10 years, talking about what a deplorable president Clinton was, but I actually didn't think his fiscal domestic policies were that bad, and I said so. Once he was out of political power, and insignificant in American politics, it didn't matter if I gave him credit or bitched every day.

With Palin, I get your shtick! I understand what you are doing! You know that a grass-roots Palin campaign could spell danger for your ambitious liberal agenda, you've seen the crowds she draws, you've seen the polling data, and you know damn good and well, if you don't stop her, she will be political trouble. So you concoct this 'image' of Palin, and reinforce it at every opportunity, just to keep her in check... to ensure she isn't a future threat to your agenda. I completely understand what you are doing, and I can't say that I blame you, she does have the potential to set the political world on fire and change the game completely. What I detest is your LYING about it, and trying to implement this 'campaign of personal destruction', while maintaining she isn't important or significant. That defies any logic or reason, and there is nothing to make people believe you really aren't concerned with Palin, because your actions tell a totally different story.

Once again, you cartoonishly overplay the significance & impact of this board.

Dano did this, as well.
 
Actually, it's you I find so funny.

How many times have you told BAC you were through with him...on this thread alone?

Yet every time, you come right back...

Hey zippie.
Would that be like all the times you said you weren't going to post to me, anymore.

Now go have yourself another box of twinkies. :cof1:
 
Yeah, but HE is insignificant.
No, Mr. Gore has a following of believers that are willing to do nearly anything to advance his agenda. Soon he will begin a new religion that worships "Mother Earth" with him as the 'Voice of Earth'...
 
Back
Top