Poll: Should all reactions generate a positive score?

Should every reaction bring positive points?


  • Total voters
    29
  • This poll will close: .
Doxxing again, anymouse? :thinking:

MAGAt rule #4 When the conversation isn't going your way, change the subject.
MAGAt rule #6 Assert your dominance by insulting anyone who disagrees with you as often as possible
MAGAt rule #8 If being attacked, use hypotheticals to defend yourself
All the MAGAts have a thing for me.
Wow, MAGAs in h.s. MAGAs everywhere bullying me since forever. I'm a VICTIM ! Always have been.
:sadbaby:
 
You sure have a thing for him.

Says his personal cheerleader and boot licker..

iu
 
Again, the reactions would still be there, Drunkle.

Let me say it real slow so even you will understand:

Nothing. would. change. other. than. the. "points".

If you want to barf on every post you can, still could.
You're missing the point that people don't want to raise their score just to give them a middle finger. If it bothers people to be downvoted, you should make the negative reactions neutral to score, like some of them already are. This way, you appease both sides. That may be needed because I've seen a few posters that already have one foot out the door.
 
You're missing the point that people don't want to raise their score just to give them a middle finger. If it bothers people to be downvoted, you should make the negative reactions neutral to score, like some of them already are. This way, you appease both sides. That may be needed because I've seen a few posters that already have one foot out the door.
$10 to your favorite charity bet that none of them are MAGAts/Friends of Damocletus. :)

Most JPP MAGAts are already banned from most forums, even conservative ones. They have no other place to go. Meanwhile, all the non-MAGAts have multiple forums to choose from.
 
They seem nervous...like something else is wrong...
They are nervous. Something IS wrong for them.

1. They are losing their audience, which considers them more and more irrrelevant.
2. They are incapable of being happy. They literally can't afford to be happy. This is related to their programming (I have already listed the program of a Democrat).
3. Once a stance is taken, it must be taken to more extreme arguments to continue to justify it, since people quickly get bored of their message. Examples of this is the progression from 'global cooling' to 'coming ice age' to 'global warming' to 'climate change' to 'climate crisis' and on into whatever the hell they want to call it. Another is lengthening out <random letters>LBTGQ<random letters>.
4. To a Democrat, something is always wrong. Again, this is related to their programming.


Program for a Democrat:
1. Pronounce Doom and Gloom.
2. Blame in Republicans and/or Trump.
3. Throw insults.
4. repeat until dead.
 
Back
Top