PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
odd that you believe so, since he specifically said that they did NOT conclude the president had committed a crime.....
Poll: More support impeaching Trump than Nixon at start of Watergate
- Thread starter Cinnabar
- Start date
odd that you believe so, since he specifically said that they did NOT conclude the president had committed a crime.....
Obviously not, illiterate dumbfuck. What part of “would not” confuses you?
“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”
“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
Sure didn’t, illiterate dumbfuck. Quit lying.
“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”
“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
"we did not conclude that the president had committed a crime"
couldn't be any clearer.....
couldn't be any clearer.....
countryboy
Verified User
Soooo, the OP breathlessly posts a two year old poll, which states, "more Americans support impeaching Trump than did Nixon at the start of Watergate". That number is supposedly 41%, TWO YEARS AGO. Now, tell us what the headline reads from the recent article. Forget about your wishful thinking for a moment.
“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”
“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
What part of “would not” confuses you, illiterate dumbfuck?
BTW, liar, you left out “but we did not exonerate him.”
countryboy
Verified User
How about the multiple witnesses who heard Mueller tell Barr the opposite? Mueller is lying.
And there's no such thing as "we didn't exonerate him". There's a presumption of innocence in our system of justice. Prosecutors either bring charges, or they don't. Mueller invented a new legal standard, "not, not guilty". There's no such thing.
Two different polls that show the same level of support.
Now, in what world will that support decline? It will only grow, won't it?
So you're starting off, before impeachment even begins, with 41% supporting it for a President who only won 46% of the vote.
Once impeachment supports crests 46%, Trump's done. Conservatives are toast. The GOP will be slaughtered.
That 41% number is never going to go down.
It's only going to go up.
BTW - Trump only got 46% of the vote in 2016.
If impeachment support crests 46%, more people in the country will support impeachment than voted for Trump.
If I was you, I'd float a lifeboat now like Amash is doing. It might make it to shore, though you will have to bale your ass off to get there.
Per Truth Detector:
“NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.”
This is what the radical Democrat Socialists want to impeach for.
Pelosi is terrified of impeachment.
“NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.”
This is what the radical Democrat Socialists want to impeach for.
Pelosi is terrified of impeachment.
That’s the liar, Barr’s account.
Once again, illiterate dumbfuck, criminal charges were NEVER on the table. How many fucking times do I have to repeat that for you morons?
Fucking idiots
This:
“but we did not exonerate him.”
And this:
FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION”
A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
And THIS boys and girls is how one unscrambles Mullet's word salad.
Obviously, the corollary is a lie.
“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
countryboy
Verified User
The point is, dumbass, in two years the number hasn't budged. Why did the headline in the more recent article read, "Support for impeaching Trump rises to 41 percent"? And you idiots wonder why it's called fake news.
countryboy
Verified User
That's not what you idiots were saying for two years.
What part of "multiple witnesses", do you not understand?
Reality: "The Constitution" demands that you accept the reality of a duly elected PRESIDENT and stop with the harassment of attempting to remove a POTUS where there is no crime committed other than some lame ass attempt to charge him with a procedural crime of an investigation that was unconstitutionally predicted. An attempted coup d'état is an attempt to remove a POTUS via other means than those constitutionally authorized.
This is beginning to get entertaining. Every day there is nothing but a THREAT, a toothless posture to impeach fully knowing NOTHING will happen or can happen to remove this POTUS from office unless YOU TAKE THE SENATE BACK in 2020. History proves your guild to be idiots. There has never been a POTUS removed via impeachment.....even presidents where there were actual indictments of crimes committed. (there has not been one indictment against Trump for Collusion or Obstruction) But you are going to convenience THE PEOPLE (the same people that elected this POTUS) that an OBSTRUCTION (where there is no apparent probable cause) of an investigation that was illegal to begin with is a valid reason to remove the person they elected? FUNNY AS HELL.
Go for it...…..lose even more of your dwindling political power.
In the meantime....AG BARR has the goods to prosecute the investigators, all documented (hiding behind a lame excuse of being classified SECRET). Barr now has the authority to peek behind any curtain he wishes while the culprits squeal like pigs. Word is "Strzok" is flopping like a beached whale turning over evidence, as the IG presented "3" criminal acts preformed by him.....thus he made a deal to avoid prosecution. I wonder who BARR is really after? He just keeps moving up the food chain.
Last edited:
The liar, Barr, hasn’t been in office two years, dumbshit.
Mueller never revealed the fact that indictment was off the table, moron.
Maybe. Depends what poll you look at.
The point is that once impeachment proceedings start, that number is not going to go down, only up.