Poll: More support impeaching Trump than Nixon at start of Watergate

LV426 said:
No you haven't.

Not what the report says at all, which is how I know you're lying about reading it.

The report says they couldn't establish criminal collusion, but they established plenty of good, old fashioned, regular collusion.

Like Paul Manafort sharing GOP polling data with Russian assets. That's collusion.

In fact, Volume I details the Russian attacks and how Americans were involved and the support certain Americans gave.

He also talks about how GOP Congressional Candidates solicited help from Russian assets for their campaigns. That was in an actual indictment.
Click to expand...

NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
 
LV426 said:
Yes it does.

You're now in denial because you know what admitting this means; that your judgment sucks, your instincts are poor, and that you lack the character to resist being conned.




ALL OF VOLUME I.

Now, it's your turn to show where in Mueller's report it says any of the things you claim it does.

You won't do that, of course, because you didn't read Mueller's report; you lied about reading it because all you can do is lie.
Click to expand...

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
 
Paul Manafort sharing GOP polling data with Russian assets. That's collusion.
Click to expand...
there was no "Russian asset" the guy was a pollster for Ukraine political parties

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-24/manafort-kilimnik-polling
Kilimnik, in an email exchange on Thursday with Bloomberg News, said he had no ties to Russian intelligence and didn’t pass along detailed polling data.

“I never got any in-depth polling data,” Kilimnik said. “This is the main issue being misinterpreted. As someone who worked with Paul on political campaigns for over 10 years I was very much interested in the U.S. presidential race. The notion that I got detailed polling data on several key states is simply nonsense. I did not share it with anyone.”

A Deripaska spokeswoman, in comments on April 26, told Bloomberg News he received no polling data from Kilimnik and no offers of such data.
 
LV426 said:
THIS SENTENCE DOES NOT APPEAR IN MUELLER'S REPORT.
Click to expand...

This one does:

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Then there is THIS:

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
 
LV426 said:
THIS QUOTE IS NOT FROM THE MUELLER REPORT.

You are lying.
Click to expand...

LV426 said:
You're the liar here because that sentence you quoted appears no where in Mueller's report.

So you lied about reading the report, and you lied about what the report -that you lied about reading- said.

You're a liar.

You lie because you have lied so much in your life that you don't even know what it is to tell the truth.
Click to expand...

:lolup:Triggered, lying liberal lunatic. :laugh:
 
Superfreak said:
Clearly you are the one that hasn't read it. You keep saying my quotes are not in the report. Yet they are.

You can't point to anything to support your claims, instead crying 'read all of volume 1' despite the FACT that you haven't read volume 1.
Click to expand...

LV426 said:
My mistake, I was searching the entire phrase on document cloud.

However, "did not establish" doesn't mean "cleared and exonerated".
Click to expand...

LMAO; you cannot make this lunatic bullshit up people. Any question what a moron this cretin is?
 
LV426 said:
I have read Volume I, I was just searching your entire quote in document cloud and because you didn't quote it accurately, it didn't come up when searched.

Secondly, Volume I establishes several instances of Conservatives and Trump folks colluding with Russia...so this narrow thing you're trying to say clears Trump doesn't actually clear him. It doesn't make him or any of his people guilty either, but it doesn't exonerate them.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
LV426 said:
Did not establish doesn't mean "cleared".

Because of this:

Separately, on August 2, 2016, Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort met in New York City with his long-time business associate Konstantin Kilimnik, who the FBI assesses to have ties to Russian Intelligence. Kilimnik requested the meeting to deliver in person a peace plan for Ukraine that Manafort acknowledged to the Special Counsel?s Of?ce was a backdoor way for Russia to control part of eastern Ukraine; both men believed the plan would require candidate Trump's assent to succeed (were he to be elected President). They also discussed the status of the Trump Campaign and Manafort's strategy for winning Democratic votes in Midwestern states. Months before that meeting, Manafort had caused internal polling data to be shared with Kilimnik, and the sharing continued for some period of time after their August meeting.

So that's not direct coordination with Russia to interfere in the elections, but it is collusion because Manafort shared the polling data with Russia in order to target voters in key states.
Click to expand...

WRONG:
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Then there is this:

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
 
prosecutors do not exonerate -Mueller overstepped his authority in an effort to make "NOT not guilty" a standard.
 
LV426 said:
Then let's hold Impeachment hearings, and you guys can defend all the shit you did that Mueller lays out in his report.
Click to expand...

Call your Party of the Jackass representative you moron; WE can't begin an impeachment here on fucking blog. What a sad, pathetic little asshole you are.
 
LV426 said:
When Trump loses next year, I believe you will delete this account and create a brand new one that distances from Trump because of how embarrassing it is for you; just like you did after Bush when you stapled a bunch of teabags to your face to convince us you cared about debt.
Click to expand...

Saved.
 
anatta said:
prosecutors do not exonerate -Mueller overstepped his authority in an effort to make "NOT not guilty" a standard.
Click to expand...

Correct. Mueller is a deep stat apparatchik like his buddy Comey. How did we even get to this state; a spineless loser like Jeff Sessions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top