Poll: Mitt Romney's Support Among Black People Is 0%

Haiku said:
We'll know exactly what happened. The GOP election stealing machine is in full force.
Click to expand...

That's right because libtardiots couldn't possibly lose elections right? Everyone agrees with you right? And those who don't are just racist, bigoted, sexist homophobes anyway

:rofl2:
 
FactsRStubborn said:
Again, who cares if Mitt only gets 0% of the colored vote or 4% of the colored vote? The GOP has won without the colored vote for years. They don't need the colored vote. So fuck em. Let them stay mired in squalor and despair. They keep doing what they are doing, they deserve to get what they are getting. All they have to do is cry that their ancestors were slaves 200 years ago and that will make them feel much better
Click to expand...

Are you serious???

Do the world a favor... take a .45 automatic, load the clip, insert into mouth... play Russian Roulette.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Errr minor correction....technically speaking that's called "Texas Roulette."
Click to expand...

Yeah, Lovey, for russian roulette one really needs a revolver. Not to quibble though, since your intentions were otherwise so on target.

By the way, I think you actually meant polish roulette. In russian roulette, some of the chambers are left empty...
 
Rune said:
Yeah, Lovey, for russian roulette one really needs a revolver. Not to quibble though, since your intentions were otherwise so on target.

By the way, I think you actually meant polish roulette. In russian roulette, some of the chambers are left empty...
Click to expand...

You truly are retarded...
 
Rune said:
Care to illustrate just how I am so retarded? You really need to wind down a little Simplefreak. You are losing it.
Click to expand...

No need for me to do so, you did quite a good job on your own...

Quote Originally Posted by Rune
Yeah, Lovey, for russian roulette one really needs a revolver. Not to quibble though, since your intentions were otherwise so on target.

By the way, I think you actually meant polish roulette. In russian roulette, some of the chambers are left empty...
Click to expand...

Were you not quite bright enough to get the joke of my inclusion of an automatic for the game of roulette? It kind of guarantees a loss for the player.
 
Superfreak said:
No need for me to do so, you did quite a good job on your own...



Were you not quite bright enough to get the joke of my inclusion of an automatic for the game of roulette? It kind of guarantees a loss for the player.
Click to expand...

lol...poor rune...with an IQ (he claims) in the 99th percentile no less...:D
 
ekg said:
Oh I don't know shit about reading poll numbers.. I'll freely admit that.. I was just trying to cork the whine since you'd been attacking people for a cpl posts and demanding the link that was right there in the article..in posting the link, I'd hope to get you off the unneeded insults since it was you who overlooked the data you were asking for, and move on to the actual information in the data..Because again, I don't know how to read polls and want to see how they came up with 0%.. if we can't even agree that yes, the link is there and has been there and oops, maybe we need to be civil about the error and admit the mistake then apologize for the insults.... then how can the discussion go forward? How can ones opinion/position be weighed as valid?

but it seems you just want to insult ppl.. so carry on. I already know how to insult, so I'll pay attention to those teaching what I don't know... ;)
Click to expand...

actually, i had already looked at the actual data and said so numerous times before your post. it was post 11. what insults are you whining about? and if i just want to insult, why was i discussing the thread topic? ooops....nice try.

you should really read more carefully and not jump in when you don't know what you're talking about.
 
ekg said:
Oh I don't know shit about reading poll numbers.. I'll freely admit that.. I was just trying to cork the whine since you'd been attacking people for a cpl posts and demanding the link that was right there in the article..in posting the link, I'd hope to get you off the unneeded insults since it was you who overlooked the data you were asking for, and move on to the actual information in the data..Because again, I don't know how to read polls and want to see how they came up with 0%.. if we can't even agree that yes, the link is there and has been there and oops, maybe we need to be civil about the error and admit the mistake then apologize for the insults.... then how can the discussion go forward? How can ones opinion/position be weighed as valid?

but it seems you just want to insult ppl.. so carry on. I already know how to insult, so I'll pay attention to those teaching what I don't know... ;)
Click to expand...


Good question...how can the discussion go forward if Yurt is too chickenshit to admit he missed the link right there in the body of the article?


Holy Moly it appears as though Yurt is going to need some salve for his buttocks after that pwning!
 
enough said:
the angry man is frothing again. what the angry man fails to state is that he claimed i lied in the title. the difference here is i merely said nigel's title is bogus, not that he lied or created it, something zappa accused me of doing when i merely copied the title.

poor angry man...all pissed and pounding on the keyboard
Click to expand...


So once again, let's go over the rules according to Yurt:

When YURT creates a thread, he is NOT responsible for any inaccuracies in the thread title that HE chose.

But when someone ELSE creates a thread, the title THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE for any inaccuracies in the thread title they choose.

Yurt...the very definition of two-faced.

:palm:
 
ZappasGuitar said:
So once again, let's go over the rules according to Yurt:

When YURT creates a thread, he is NOT responsible for any inaccuracies in the thread title that HE chose.

But when someone ELSE creates a thread, the title THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE for any inaccuracies in the thread title they choose.

Yurt...the very definition of two-faced.

:palm:
Click to expand...

did i say nigel was responsible for the inaccuracies? cite.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top