Poll: 60% of Americans Opposed to Syria Attack, Just 9% Support it

blackascoal

The Force is With Me
Poll || Most Americans oppose intervention in Syria even if chemical attack confirmed
About 60 percent of respondents in a Reuters/Ipsos poll said United States should not intervene in Syria's civil war, while just 9 percent thought President Barack Obama should act.
Aug. 25, 2013

Americans strongly oppose U.S. intervention in Syria's civil war and believe Washington should stay out of the conflict even if reports that Syria's government used deadly chemicals to attack civilians are confirmed, a Reuters/Ipsos poll says.

About 60 percent of Americans surveyed said the United States should not intervene in Syria's civil war, while just 9 percent thought President Barack Obama should act.

More Americans would back intervention if it is established that chemical weapons have been used, but even that support has dipped in recent days - just as Syria's civil war has escalated and the images of hundreds of civilians allegedly killed by chemicals appeared on television screens and the Internet.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll, taken August 19-23, found that 25 percent of Americans would support U.S. intervention if Syrian President Bashar Assad's forces used chemicals to attack civilians, while 46 percent would oppose it. That represented a decline in backing for U.S. action since August 13, when Reuters/Ipsos tracking polls found that 30.2 percent of Americans supported intervention in Syria if chemicals had been used, while 41.6 percent did not.

Taken together, the polls suggest that so far, the growing crisis in Syria, and the emotionally wrenching pictures from an alleged chemical attack in a Damascus suburb this week, may actually be hardening many Americans' resolve not to get involved in another conflict in the Middle East.

more
http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/1.543391
 
the crap response:

we are not "getting involved" - just punishing Assad. Not trying to turn the war..just lobbing a few cruise missiles ....I shit thee not -this is the dissembling

having to meddle, having to disregard WHATEVER the UN inspectors find. Having to resort to showing Obama has cojones

Obama is busily talking to his advisors, and the French -where before he was circumspect -now ( being so independent minded) he is swayed towards ACTION!!

A sickening fool, our POTUS.
 
I am anti-war regardless of who is starting the war. I am very disappointed in so many liberals becoming Democratic apologists on this issue. Dead is dead. Try telling the mothers of the dead that it's different because Obama did it. Man, that is some bullshit.
 
the crap response:

we are not "getting involved" - just punishing Assad. Not trying to turn the war..just lobbing a few cruise missiles ....I shit thee not -this is the dissembling

having to meddle, having to disregard WHATEVER the UN inspectors find. Having to resort to showing Obama has cojones

Obama is busily talking to his advisors, and the French -where before he was circumspect -now ( being so independent minded) he is swayed towards ACTION!!

A sickening fool, our POTUS.

Told you. He's got military blue balls.
 
NEVER AGAIN!


or was that only never again if they are white people?


Desh just dropped the race card on Darla!


holy-sht.gif
 
It sures seems like the country gassed its own people.


Remember that was ONE of the many reasons the right gave to get Sadam.


It was about the ONLY true one albeit a very old charge

Yeah, exactly. It's one of the reasons the right gave for Iraq. I was against it then. I'm against it now.
 
by bombing the equipment for them to gas others.


should we just allow them to massacre their population?

Is 200 odd people really a massacre? I don't even buy that this happened. Smells like eau de CIA to moi.

But either way, we aren't going to bomb the equipment they used to do this. Where is that equipment Desh?

We're going to institute air strikes. Air strikes always immoral. Even when Obama does it.
 
Back
Top