POLITICALLY CORRECT to vandalize 225 year old CHRITOPHER COULUMBUS sttaue

As Trump shouts about taking America backwards in time, the left is making way for a future forward-thinking America that isn't afraid to look at our past honestly.
 
Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar

And just "HOW" will they "destroy our history"?

Removing a few statues is going to do all that?



Like I said about a week ago. Just take'm alllll down. Removing dead cold stone MLK statues, name of boulevards, name of schools, etc. won't change history either, right? Good...problem solved :awesome:
 
As Trump shouts about taking America backwards in time, the left is making way for a future forward-thinking America that isn't afraid to look at our past honestly.

The Left is so afraid of the Democrat party's past ... that they want to remove it from public view. :palm:
 
Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar

And just "HOW" will they "destroy our history"?

Removing a few statues is going to do all that?



Like I said about a week ago. Just take'm alllll down. Removing dead cold stone MLK statues, name of boulevards, name of schools, etc. won't change history either, right? Good...problem solved :awesome:
Let's just go Beirut -no street names :rolleyes:

yep.we can have no history,no culture,no remembrances of who we are.
Or the Renaissance science where we figured out the world was a globe

By Golly Columbus should have just sailed off the edge!
 
Of course, if the south hadn't been a bunch of traitors in the 1860s, or at least had avoided the temptation to attack America, we wouldn't have any statues of the CSA to tear down.

Whether Secession was legal at the time was up for debate. And was, ultimately, decided on the battlefield.
 
Whether Secession was legal at the time was up for debate. And was, ultimately, decided on the battlefield.

I personally don't believe that political battles are decided militarily, except, perhaps, the right of succession in a monarchy. You certainly can't decide anything via armed conflict in a constitutional republic. Either the correct side wins or loses, but, the constitutionally correct argument remains separate.
 
Where were all the statuephobes while Obama was Prez?
And, Pelosi? All of a sudden after 30 years, she decides that she wants to be a statuephobe.
Opportunists blowin' with the alt left wind.
You weren't paying attention, this has been going on for some time, it has just intensified.
 
lol BD. I just posted the same...Herring Run Park -can you believe these assholes??
.
3d1a2c0154be7f57c9e0f93ccf217146.jpg
 
but leaving them in place is unthinkable

oh the hyperbole


According to your Leftwing "logic", ISIS isn't destroying history either. What a fucking sick moron you are.

Am I shocked that I asked JPP Trumpkins for specifics regarding how removing a few statues is going to "destroy our history" - their words - and all I get is more diversionary nonsense?

Of COURSE not.

They aren't thinking logically, they are EMOTING and therefore can't come up with a rational response.
 
it's an assault on our history - I don't know if it would destroy it.
Do you get the idea of how vile revisionism is? It's applying our temporary 21st century ideas by a MINORITY if the population ( not like racial minority -numerical minority) to vandalize their marginal viewpoint.

It's illegal, it's not done thru a historical commission or a ballot box. It's not the will of 'we the people'.
It's very much ISIS like behavior as well

But there is NO revisionism.

Removing a few statues from the public square and moving them to an appropriate civil war memorial would be more akin to CONCENTRATING our history to a single, easily accessible location.

And if people want to study the civil war in depth, there are still THOUSANDS of PUBLIC LIBRARIES in virtually every city in this nation, that contain entire SECTIONS devoted to the civil war.
 
Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar

And just "HOW" will they "destroy our history"?

Removing a few statues is going to do all that?



Like I said about a week ago. Just take'm alllll down. Removing dead cold stone MLK statues, name of boulevards, name of schools, etc. won't change history either, right? Good...problem solved :awesome:

Except we aren't going to "take them all down", that's just another example of ridiculous, overblown Trumpkin hyperbole, therefore history won't be destroyed as hand wringing Trumpkins claim.
 
People have always destroyed or vandalised statues, surely? How many over here have noses? Precious few! Like taking over huge areas of churches to show off your family power, they are asking for it, and I've always been baffled as to what anyone ever gets out of the silly things.
 
Am I shocked that I asked JPP Trumpkins for specifics regarding how removing a few statues is going to "destroy our history" - their words - and all I get is more diversionary nonsense?

Of COURSE not.


They aren't thinking logically, they are EMOTING and therefore can't come up with a rational response.


u want 2 destroy us history 2 hide the raciss past of the dem party

others want those physical reminders of the dem raciss passed to stay where they r

u need 2 c those reminders every day 2 make sure u never 4 get the raciss past of ur rotten party

but u r willing to desecrate what some think r holy 2 appease a mob and groupthink

will u object when the smashers and defacers come 4 all reminders of the rest of americas passed men & women like betsy ross washington lincoln jefferson hamilton etc?

there r all ready peeps who want to take founders away and replace them with people like pocohontas

lemme know when u approve of tearing down monuments 2 raciss dems like woodrow wilson fdr truman and byrd

mlk has 2 b purged 2 cuz he wuz anti gay

call 4 that will u?



Vice President Mike Pence said his inclination is to encourage building more American monuments rather than tearing them down.

"I can't help but think that rather than tearing down monuments that have graced our cities all across this country for years we ought to be building more monuments," Pence remarked.

Since the violent white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia that left one dead, Confederate statues have been defaced and knocked down by "anti-fascist" rioters. Lately the vandalizing has spread to statues of Christopher Columbus and Abraham Lincoln. Some are even calling for statues and parks honoring George Washington to be taken down and renamed.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/08/22/pence-i-believe-more-monuments-confederate-charlottesville
 
Am I shocked that I asked JPP Trumpkins for specifics regarding how removing a few statues is going to "destroy our history" - their words - and all I get is more diversionary nonsense?

Of COURSE not.

They aren't thinking logically, they are EMOTING and therefore can't come up with a rational response.
.
4dd8eebad25c5dee70bd497fe5ebd807.jpg
 
But there is NO revisionism.

Removing a few statues from the public square and moving them to an appropriate civil war memorial would be more akin to CONCENTRATING our history to a single, easily accessible location.

And if people want to study the civil war in depth, there are still THOUSANDS of PUBLIC LIBRARIES in virtually every city in this nation, that contain entire SECTIONS devoted to the civil war.

u lie

there is plenty of lib revisionism & repression of history

libs censor any thing that triggers them when they can

they even censored Huck Finn

libraries r dying out with shorter hours funding cuts and u know it

i bet u havent been in 1 in years

libs are trying to control what info is on the internet 2

we c your game lib



Should the president be blamed for keeping a weather eye out for the good name of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson?

It’s hard, after all, to imagine that the hard-core left has any noble purposes in this violence. The first figure arrested in Durham was picked up after a press conference of the World Workers Party, a Marxist melange that stuck with the Soviets through Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968. Lately they’ve been on the barricades defending — wait for it — North Korea.

It takes a lot of Communist commitment to believe Trump is worse than Kim Jong Un. There’s no reason to imagine that the left is going to settle for a few statues of Lee.

The left wants to attack the very legitimacy of America, of which Washington is the real symbol. And going after statues and other cultural icons is part of the Marxist playbook.

It was written about by George Orwell in his dystopian novel “1984,” a quote from which is making the rounds this week.

In it, one of Orwell’s characters warns of how “every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has been altered.”

“And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute,” adds Orwell’s character. “History has stopped.”



http://nypost.com/2017/08/16/a-warning-from-george-orwell-on-the-monument-wars/
 
Except we aren't going to "take them all down", that's just another example of ridiculous, overblown Trumpkin hyperbole, therefore history won't be destroyed as hand wringing Trumpkins claim.

Well, that's the problem then isn't it? You gonna take one down? Then take'm all down. No prejudice that way. :)
 
Back
Top