Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
No, it doesn't. It shows a mark that is consistent with an injury.
A mark isn't evidence of an injury. It's a mark. Do you have a shot of the back of Zimmerman's head before the incident as compared to after the incident? Because without that you don't have evidence of anything other than a mark on his head. It's consistent with an injury but not evidence of one.
it sure is evidence of an injury. i love how you now back off the source attack, given your link said the same thing. like i said, it doesn't prove anything for this case.