Piers Morgan getting Dixie-chicked

Again, not a valid comparison. They weren't calling upon the Federal government to shut rush up.
It's a valid comparison, mostly because there isn't even the same goal. You come here with "outrage" that somebody would create such a functionally comedic petition, but remain silent when others actually try to act against somebody using the same Right.

Do you really believe that these people think that Obama has the power to deport somebody for this?

LOL. Silly petitions taking advantage of the promise to officially respond to any petition with a requisite number is absolutely free speech. It shows the silliness of all the petitions that have gone past the ridiculously low threshold to merit an "official" response, you know those ones used as some sign they have a mandate from the masses.
 
It's a valid comparison, mostly because there isn't even the same goal. You come here with "outrage" that somebody would create such a functionally comedic petition, but remain silent when others actually try to act against somebody using the same Right.

Do you really believe that these people think that Obama has the power to deport somebody for this?

LOL. Silly petitions taking advantage of the promise to officially respond to any petition with a requisite number is absolutely free speech. It shows the silliness of all the petitions that have gone past the ridiculously low threshold to merit an "official" response, you know those ones used as some sign they have a mandate from the masses.

You mean Howeys petition to ban guns?
 
Two fucking wrongs don't make a right. What the fuck is your point?

AND the point is the liberal Democrats have been on Limbaugh ass for more that 10 or 15 years trying to get him off the air
and/or boycott his advertisers, etc.....so get your facts right....

AND the so called Fairness Doctrine was also an attempt to use the power of the federal government to silence conservatives
because they are so VERY successful on radio and to a lesser extent on TV.....

AND as I proved to you a few minutes ago.....you and your pinhead friends are STILL trying to use the government to silence the right.

GET THE POINT NOW, fool ?
 
AND the point is the liberal Democrats have been on Limbaugh ass for more that 10 or 15 years trying to get him off the air
and/or boycott his advertisers, etc.....so get your facts right....

AND the so called Fairness Doctrine was also an attempt to use the power of the federal government to silence conservatives
because they are so VERY successful on radio and to a lesser extent on TV.....

AND as I proved to you a few minutes ago.....you and your pinhead friends are STILL trying to use the government to silence the right.

GET THE POINT NOW, fool ?

I can see your point, pretty clearly - you care when the left does this, but not the right.

Noted.
 
No you don't get it.....

The Democrats and liberal supporters have to trying to use the Fairness doctrine to decades to silence or at the very least limit the free speech of
conservative radio for decades, until it was abolished by the FCC...then the lefties threatened the FCC and tried to get the doctrine reinstated
but Reagan vetoed the Democratic-controlled Congress's effort to make the doctrine law....then they tried again and G. Bush put a stop to that.....

It was ALWAYS the left that tried to use the government to limit our free speech rights via the doctrine, boycotts, demonstrations, etc.......a petition by some citizens is nothing like that at all...We don't even know who the people are....and to claim that its only gun supporters and that they are all right wingers just shows your ignorance.....
As ignorant as claiming that all Christians are Conservatives or Republican or right wing.....

The lefties have proven over and over, beyond any doubt, they are the masters of character assassination and extortion to get their way.

So....no, you don't get it at all.....
 
It's a valid comparison, mostly because there isn't even the same goal. You come here with "outrage" that somebody would create such a functionally comedic petition, but remain silent when others actually try to act against somebody using the same Right.

Do you really believe that these people think that Obama has the power to deport somebody for this?

LOL. Silly petitions taking advantage of the promise to officially respond to any petition with a requisite number is absolutely free speech. It shows the silliness of all the petitions that have gone past the ridiculously low threshold to merit an "official" response, you know those ones used as some sign they have a mandate from the masses.
Weak Damo, sadly weak. Those "other people" aren't calling upon the federal government to intervene to deny another person their constitutional rights. So they don't compare, not at all.
 
Weak Damo, sadly weak. Those "other people" aren't calling upon the federal government to intervene to deny another person their constitutional rights. So they don't compare, not at all.

Again, a petition clearly created to show off the silliness of the petition site isn't what you are saying. They aren't "advocating" for anything other than to show that the silly petitions that Obama has tried to promote as a mandate are just as stupid as this one.

Your "outrage" notwithstanding, you aren't going to be able to convince me that your "outrage" is even real. Nobody believes that Piers Morgan is going to be deported, not even the people who signed the "petition"... However, if Obama is going to keep his promise he'll have to officially respond to it.

Tell me... What was your position on the petition to "deport" all the people who signed equally comedic secession petitions? Were you "outraged" that petitions were created to have federal action against citizens that used their Free Speech/Assembly/Petition Rights? Can you link me up to your past "outrage" over it? If not, why?
 
Again, a petition clearly created to show off the silliness of the petition site isn't what you are saying. They aren't "advocating" for anything other than to show that the silly petitions that Obama has tried to promote as a mandate are just as stupid as this one.

Your "outrage" notwithstanding, you aren't going to be able to convince me that your "outrage" is even real. Nobody believes that Piers Morgan is going to be deported, not even the people who signed the "petition"... However, if Obama is going to keep his promise he'll have to officially respond to it.

Tell me... What was your position on the petition to "deport" all the people who signed equally comedic secession petitions?
Again I have no problem with that but the intent of the petition is to call upon the Federal governemnt to deny a person a constitutionally protected human right. That sir is hypocrisy of the highest order.
 
Again I have no problem with that but the intent of the petition is to call upon the Federal governemnt to deny a person a constitutionally protected human right. That sir is hypocrisy of the highest order.

So was the petition to deport people who had petitioned for secession.... Again, sir, can you point me to your expressed "outrage" over it back then? Why is it that you suddenly feel "outrage" for it now?

Same action/same site/different people. Hypocrite much, Mott?

I'll also give you money if you find me "outraging" over the "deport those people" petitions previously...
 
So was the petition to deport people who had petitioned for secession.... Again, sir, can you point me to your expressed "outrage" over it back then? Why is it that you suddenly feel "outrage" for it now?

Same action/same site/different people. Hypocrite much, Mott?

I'll also give you money if you find me "outraging" over the "deport those people" petitions previously...
Show me the petition. I would also argue, not having heard of this petition, that it is equaly hypocritical. As for your faux outrage, I could care less about that. I'm laughing at the stupidty and hypocrisy of the petition so spare me the hyperbole.
 
Show me the petition. I would also argue, not having heard of this petition, that it is equaly hypocritical. As for your faux outrage, I could care less about that. I'm laughing at the stupidty and hypocrisy of the petition so spare me the hyperbole.

Well the stupidity is part of the point of the petition.

http://now.msn.com/secession-petition-signers-should-be-deported-say-counter-protesters

New viral petition requests all the secessionists be deported...

We talked about it on this site, at the same time we were talking about the silly secession petitions. Same site, same action requested. No outrage from the "left" who are suddenly "outraged" over equally silly stuff asking for the same thing...

Why do people take these stupid petitions seriously at all? Other than the "forced to officially respond" thing, all they are is comedic relief.

This is becoming as ridiculous as the White House "report people who say things about Obama" crap. Just functional nonsense taken seriously, mostly by leftist people who want to express "outrage".
 
Exactly! Total fucking hypocrits.

Neither of you morons can prove anyone on the 'right' is petitioning about anything.....thats your assumption....

I have proven with historical fact how the left and Democrats have used the gov. trying to silence or limit the free speech of the conservatives.....
just recently, the union thugs and Obamas and congressional Democrat support of them is further proof....
 
Mostly on the side of "outrage"... I'd agree.

The WH petition site has become as much of a joke as his "tell on your neighbor" stuff.

Uh, no. Mostly from the guy who turned a petition against Piers Morgan into a slam on Obama.

You & bravo are doing the same obfuscation. How's that feel?
 
Uh, no. Mostly from the guy who turned a petition against Piers Morgan into a slam on Obama.

You & bravo are doing the same obfuscation. How's that feel?


If I said something wrong or untrue, just spit it out.....refute what you don't agree with instead of whining to other posters....
 
Back
Top