Photographer admits prize-winning image was AI-generated

[BidenPresident]

“We, the photo world, need an open discussion,” said Eldagsen. “A discussion about what we want to consider photography and what not. Is the umbrella of photography large enough to invite AI images to enter – or would this be a mistake?

“With my refusal of the award I hope to speed up this debate.”

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...r-admits-prize-winning-image-was-ai-generated

 

[Hawkeye10]

AI is the product of the insanity of man.

 

[BidenPresident]

AI is the product of the insanity of man.

You are insane. Nothing you say makes sense.

 

[AProudLefty]

“We, the photo world, need an open discussion,” said Eldagsen. “A discussion about what we want to consider photography and what not. Is the umbrella of photography large enough to invite AI images to enter – or would this be a mistake?

“With my refusal of the award I hope to speed up this debate.”

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...r-admits-prize-winning-image-was-ai-generated

It spells trouble for the Dost test. "I see when I see it".

It spells trouble, legal wise.

 

[BidenPresident]

It spells trouble for the Dost test. "I see when I see it".

It spells trouble, legal wise.

What legal trouble?

 

[AProudLefty]

What legal trouble?

AI has the potential to create pictures/videos so realistic that it can get a viewer in legal trouble, even if the person(s) in the videos/pictures are AI generated.

Where do we cross the line?

 

[BidenPresident]

AI has the potential to create pictures/videos so realistic that it can get a viewer in legal trouble, even if the person(s) in the videos/pictures are AI generated.

Where do we cross the line?

What is the line?

 

[AProudLefty]

What is the line?

Sorry for not explaining. The line is sexual in nature. What's worse is if the likeness of someone is used in the generation of pictures/videos in sexual manners.

 

[BidenPresident]

Sorry for not explaining. The line is sexual in nature. What's worse is if the likeness of someone is used in the generation of pictures/videos in sexual manners.

If you do it in private what is the harm?

 

[AProudLefty]

If you do it in private what is the harm?

No harm until the person is caught.

 

[BidenPresident]

No harm until the person is caught.

If it is private who is catching it?

 

[AProudLefty]

If it is private who is catching it?

Do you know what a Dost test is?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dost_test

The eventuality of AI developing all kinds of porn has been hotly debated. There are NO real victims, except for the viewers.

That is what I meant by legal problem.

 

[BidenPresident]

Do you know what a Dost test is?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dost_test

The eventuality of AI developing all kinds of porn has been hotly debated. There are NO real victims, except for the viewers.

That is what I meant by legal problem.

ok

 

[AProudLefty]

ok

Yeah. I brought it up because it's part of your OP.

The picture is so real that everyone thought those people were real.

 

[BidenPresident]

Yeah. I brought it up because it's part of your OP.

The picture is so real that everyone thought those people were real.

And the photographer told them it was AI generated.

 

[AProudLefty]

And the photographer told them it was AI generated.

And if he didn't?

 

[BidenPresident]

And if he didn't?

It was his intention.

 

[AProudLefty]

It was his intention.

I know. Shows that people can't be too careful.

Eventually we won't be able to tell real from fake on the media.

They even already created deepfakes of Biden and Trump.

 

[BidenPresident]

I know. Shows that people can't be too careful.

Eventually we won't be able to tell real from fake on the media.

They even already created deepfakes of Biden and Trump.

Dumb people existed in all stages of world history. Nothing new here.

 

[Walt]

AI is the product of the insanity of man.

It would better be described as the product of evolution. It is designed a lot more hands off than you are implying.