Pete Hegseth Published Column Saying Sex with Unconscious Woman Isn't Rape

Matt Dillon said:
Look, Shitbirds.
Hegseth has 2 Bronze Stars. Dutch Uncle and guno are a couple of fuckwit shitbags that should FOAD.
Click to expand...

Remind me again: are we allowed to insult POW's, MIA's, Bronze Star winners? I can never remember since Trump helped us see what losers most of the military are.

Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Guno צְבִי said:
In November 2024, Pete Hegseth, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for defense secretary, came under scrutiny for his past, in which a woman had accused him of sexual assault. In response, Snopes readers and various online posts raised another action from Hegseth's past — varied claims that he had either published or written a college newspaper column that said sex with an unconscious woman was not rape.

The claim appeared on X, along with a screenshot of text from the alleged article. The X post stated Hegseth was responsible for publishing such a column: "Pete Hegseth published a column in college that claimed having sex with an unconscious woman is not rape.
Click to expand...

Dutch Uncle said:
Awesome. @anonymoose would certainly approve. :hand:

4c9851c8d0c6ff5f65460009dfcf16a70113f475.jpg
Click to expand...
This news and knowledge will assuredly increase his standing in the eyes of ignorant redneck MAGAtrash who see the world in the same light.
 
Daylight63 said:
Remind me again: are we allowed to insult POW's, MIA's, Bronze Star winners? I can never remember since Trump helped us see what losers most of the military are.

Any help would be much appreciated.
Click to expand...
because demmycunts are free to lie about Trump AND soldiers......
 
volsrock1 said:
Is the NYTs responsible for EVERY opinion in the paper?
Click to expand...
Yes. Do you think they'd allow a terrorist to claim "Death to America!" and detail plans how like-minded nutjobs can murder Americans? Just how stupid are you, volsk? Next question.
 
volsrock1 said:
The Princeton Tory

Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the editors, trustees, Princeton University, or the Princeton Tory, Inc.

About

The Princeton Tory is a journal of conservative and moderate political thought written, edited and produced by Princeton University students and delivered free of charge to all Princeton students and faculty. The Princeton Tory is a publication of The Princeton Tory, Inc.Opinions expressed...
www.theprincetontory.com www.theprincetontory.com

WHOOPS!
Click to expand...
Tory. That says a lot, doesn't it, volsk? LOL

Sure, hide like a fucking coward behind that, but you do appear to be stupid enough to think the publisher of the "Tory" or the NYT doesn't limit what is published.
 
Young people say a lot of dumb things, but to take this claim seriously I will need to see the text as well as evidence that he wrote it.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
The link does not support the thread title....if there is such information it must be presented.

More likely the thread title is yet another JPP lie.
Click to expand...
Gee, #10. What is the thread title and why do you think the link doesn't support it?

Here, let me help you get started:

Pete Hegseth Published Column Saying Sex with Unconscious Woman Isn't Rape​

Your turn.

I'm curious how many MAGAts come running to support your claim. Only the truly stupid ones, IMO. LOL
 
Not only did the author not claim it was not rape, merely questioned if it is, the context of the legal definition of rape being massively changed over time is omitted. At one time force was a requirement. I dont doubt the claim that in the year this piece was written at least one state still required it, making the point valid.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Not only did the author not claim it was not rape, merely questioned if it is, the context of the legal definition of rape being massively changed over time is omitted. At one time force was a requirement. I dont doubt the claim that in the year this piece was written at least one state still required it, making the point valid.
Click to expand...

2015

A majority of states still rely on the concept of force in defining rape, though the idea is “woefully out of step,” according to a law professor who has written a law review article on the issue.

Rape laws differ on force requirement for prosecution; how should model law be changed?

The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal profession from Wall Street to Main Street to Pennsylvania Avenue.
www.abajournal.com
 
volsrock1 said:
2015

A majority of states still rely on the concept of force in defining rape, though the idea is “woefully out of step,” according to a law professor who has written a law review article on the issue.

Rape laws differ on force requirement for prosecution; how should model law be changed?

The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal profession from Wall Street to Main Street to Pennsylvania Avenue.
www.abajournal.com
Click to expand...
And we got all the way to the point where guys are thrown out of universities for sexual assault if the woman the next morning or three months later has bad feelings about the sex, even if she was all into it when it happened.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Not only did the author not claim it was not rape, merely questioned if it is, the context of the legal definition of rape being massively changed over time is omitted. At one time force was a requirement. I dont doubt the claim that in the year this piece was written at least one state still required it, making the point valid.
Click to expand...
And in a huge Blue State


2021

The Minnesota Supreme Court said that a man who had sex with a woman while she was passed out on his couch can’t be convicted of rape because the woman willingly got drunk beforehand.

slate.com

Minnesota Supreme Court Throws Out Rape Conviction Because Victim Chose to Get Drunk

Many states say that in order for a victim to be too mentally incapacitated to give consent they must have become intoxicated against their will.
slate.com slate.com
 
volsrock1 said:
And in a huge Blue State


2021

The Minnesota Supreme Court said that a man who had sex with a woman while she was passed out on his couch can’t be convicted of rape because the woman willingly got drunk beforehand.

slate.com

Minnesota Supreme Court Throws Out Rape Conviction Because Victim Chose to Get Drunk

Many states say that in order for a victim to be too mentally incapacitated to give consent they must have become intoxicated against their will.
slate.com slate.com
Click to expand...
Knowing full well that a lot of people both have and enjoy drunk sex the feminists are trying to set up the law so that at any time after if the woman decides she wants to she can have the guy prosecuted. They figure that men who live under constant fear will do as women instruct. It is already so at universities, where men are told that if they have sex with a drunk female they might come to regret it. We are not talking passed out, we are talking legally drunk.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
How does that change the fact Pete published this crap that having sex with an unconscious woman isn't rape?

Do if someone found one of your female relatives passed out from alcohol or drugs and then fucked her, would you be okay with that, Matt? @anonymoose would be fine with it. How about you?
Click to expand...

The Minnesota Supreme Court said that a man who had sex with a woman while she was passed out on his couch can’t be convicted of rape because the woman willingly got drunk beforehand.

Ask the Bue Minnesota Supreme Court the Chief Justice appointed by Walz...they are fine with it

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top