May I suggest moving to Baltimore?
Only if they cancelled the murderous police dept. We all know how unsafe it is with police lurking.
Well at least they let criminals be criminals after Freddy Gray.
May I suggest moving to Baltimore?
Except California...
https://www.ppic.org/publication/income-inequality-in-california/
https://calmatters.org/california-d...in-some-counties-the-disparities-are-extreme/
Or New York...
http://fiscalpolicy.org/nys-leads-nation-in-income-inequality
Basically in Blue states there is the greatest amount of income inequality and unfairness in social and economic justice there is in the US. So much for Progressives delivering on their ideas...
Only if they cancelled the murderous police dept. We all know how unsafe it is with police lurking.
Well at least they let criminals be criminals after Freddy Gray.
...deleted Holy Quote from MSN...
Learn to think for yourself. Stop stealing the arguments of others and using them as your own.
Total BULLSHIT! This entire article and post is trying to justify tyranny as a means to lengthen life.Noam N. Levey 10 hrs ago
Weak environmental protections, safety rules and labor and civil rights protections may be cutting lives short in conservative states and deepening the divide between red and blue states, according to a new study on links between life expectancy and state policy.
BULLSHIT.The report, published Tuesday in the health policy journal Milbank Quarterly, finds that states where residents live longest, including California, tend to have much more stringent environmental laws, tougher tobacco and firearms regulations and more protections for workers, minorities and LGBTQ residents.
Making up numbers. BULLSHIT.Since the mid-1980s, the gap among U.S. states in how long their residents live has widened, reversing decades of progress toward greater equality.
Making up numbers. BULLSHIT.One group of states, mostly in the Northeast and the West, have seen average life expectancies rise relatively steadily, placing them on par with the wealthiest nations of Western Europe. Those states tend to have more stringent regulations.
Making up numbers. BULLSHIT.By contrast, the life expectancy in states with more conservative health, labor and social policies — concentrated in the South andAppalachia — have stagnated in recent decades, according to the study, which adds to growing research on health and political disparities between states.
Making up numbers. BULLSHIT.California has among the highest average life expectancies in the country, at 81.3 years. It also had the most liberal policies in the nation in 2014, the most recent year the study analyzed, according to the system the authors developed to rank states.
Of course they can't. They are MAKING UP RANDOM NUMBERS and using them as data.Although the study's authors note that they can't prove that state policies caused the gap in life expectancy, the correlation is a persistent one across multiple states and several decades.
The Milbank report is total BULLSHIT.“It’s disheartening to see another example of a missed opportunity by policymakers,” said David Radley, senior scientist at the nonprofit Commonwealth Fund who studies differences in state health policies and the effects on people’s health. Radley was not involved in Milbank report.
There is no 'coronavirus pandemic'. Only 0.3% of the population is infected. The death rate is only 0.002% of the population. This virus is much milder than H1N1 was a few years ago, when Democrats didn't lock down the economy to make Trump look bad, and no one was panicking about masks, and people went about their daily lives. Fuck you.The new report may help shape efforts to rethink government policy in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, which has exposed deep structural weaknesses in the U.S. as well as yawning gaps in many state safety nets.
Total BULLSHIT. This author is obviously trying to justify Marxism.“The overarching conclusion is clear: States that have invested in their populations’ social and economic well-being by enacting more liberal policies over time tend to be the same states that have made considerable gains in life expectancy,” the study’s authors wrote.
More made up numbers. BULLSHIT.Even before the current public health crisis, life expectancy in the U.S. had been declining, setting America apart from most other wealthy nations. That decline has fueled tough questions about domestic policy.
Never mind the deaths caused by alcohol, pot, heroin, meth, fentanyl, acid, cigarettes, etc.The opioid epidemic, which has had a devastating impact on regions of the country already hit hard by economic stagnation, has been the focus of a lot of the discussion about that shift.
Another University Idiot pushing Marxism.But Syracuse University sociologist Jennifer Karas Montez, the lead author of the new study, said the impact of opioids may be only part of the story.
No. Getting off the damned drugs is what is important.“When we look at what is happening with life expectancy, the tendency is to focus on individual explanations about what Americans are doing,” she said, noting obesity and smoking behaviors as well as drug use. “But state policies are so important.”
Total BULLSHIT. Marxism doesn't work. It is theft.To assess what role these policies may be playing, Montez and other researchers reviewed more than 120 policies enacted by states over the years and assessed whether each policy choice in each state was more liberal or more conservative.
Rent controls don't work. They cause a housing shortage. It is fascism.Policies included housing rules such as rent control;
High taxes to pay for medical care doesn't work. Welfare doesn't work. They are both theft.health and welfare policies such as Medicaid eligibility and welfare limits;
Minimum wage laws are price controls. Price controls don't work. Minimum wage laws put people out of work. They are fascism.labor protections such as paid sick leave and minimum wages;
Fascism.and civil rights policies such as gender discrimination bans,
Vandalism, assault, arson, and murder are already illegal. Why do you need 'hate crime' laws?hate-crime laws
Doesn't support life at all. Same sex couples are not capable of producing a child.and same-sex marriage.
Abortion of a child is killing a child. That is not a good life expectancy for the child.They also looked at state abortion restrictions,
High taxes mean crappy economy.tax policy,
You mean propaganda spending.education spending,
Determined by the federal government, not by any State.immigration rules
BULLSHIT. No correlation. See the FBI records on this. Gun control laws are illegal in the United States. There's this thing called the 2nd amendment, you see.and gun control laws.
Another 'best of' and 'worst of' list. BULLSHIT opinions.Each state was ranked by how liberal or conservative its policies overall have been, going back to 1970.
No such data. Random numbers.The researchers then compared these findings to trends in life expectancy in all 50 states.
BULLSHIT. There is no data. Manufactured numbers are not data.Montez said the trends they saw were unmistakable. They also correlated with important points in the nation’s political history.
Yet another push for Marxism, calling Reagan 'evil'.Through the 1960s and 1970s, for example, state life expectancies generally converged. That trend began to reverse in the mid-1980s, around the same time that a conservative movement, led by President Reagan and mirrored in many state capitols, became ascendant.
BULLSHIT. Bigotry. Random numbers are not data.The gap between states accelerated further after 2010, when sweeping Republican victories in state elections shifted policies further to the right in many places.
BULLSHIT. Random numbers are not data. I've lived in Hawaii.By 2017, residents of the state with the highest life expectancy — Hawaii — were living on average seven years longer than residents of the state with the lowest life expectancy — Mississippi.
BULLSHIT numbers again.By contrast, the gap between the best- and worst-performing states in 1984 was less than five years.
BULLSHIT numbers again. Pushing for Marxism again.The gap is not only about policy: States where people live longer tend to be wealthier and have better educated populations, for example.
You can take your Marxism and stuff it.But Montez noted that decisions by state leaders have helped shape those factors.
You can't 'invest in the population'. you can't 'invest in schools'. They have no ROI. Since schools are basically propaganda centers now, students leave these schools almost as illiterate as when the started them.“States like Connecticut are investing in their population, investing in schools, setting an economic floor for their workers, discouraging behaviors like smoking that kill people,”
Irrelevant.she explained. “You have other states like Mississippi and Oklahoma that aren’t doing any of this.”
BULLSHIT numbers. Random made up numbers are not data.In Connecticut, whose policies have become steadily more liberal over the last half century, life expectancy increased 5.8 years between 1980 and 2017 to 80.7 years.
BULLSHIT numbers. Random made up numbers are not data.In Oklahoma, which has become markedly more conservative, life expectancy increased only 2.2 years over the same period, reaching 75.8 years in 2017.
Pushing the same Marxism and quoting the same BULLSHIT numbers is still lying....deleted repetition...
Take your 'studies' and stick 'em where the sun don't shine, then you crawl in after it.
Red states have higher poverty rates than blue states. As for cost of living, that isn't always an accurate reflection of quality of life. European countries with a higher cost of living than America usually have better health, education, employment, and so on.
I'm convinced. We're moving to Detroit or maybe south Shitcago.
Except California...
https://www.ppic.org/publication/income-inequality-in-california/
https://calmatters.org/california-d...in-some-counties-the-disparities-are-extreme/
Or New York...
http://fiscalpolicy.org/nys-leads-nation-in-income-inequality
Basically in Blue states there is the greatest amount of income inequality and unfairness in social and economic justice there is in the US. So much for Progressives delivering on their ideas...
Ha, I lived in N.O. , LA . You'd be negligent to not be armed there. After two friends and an uncle were murdered in that shithole I left in '91.
Lie. Stone cold lie.Nope. The Left never supported the Soviet Union.
Lie. There was no vote.During the Russian Provisional Government, the Left voted for a Liberal Democracy.
Lie. They were communists.The Bolsheviks, being typical right-wing Fascists,
Lie. They created an oligarchy that implemented communism.used force to take over and create a Fascist government.
Yes. They were the Marxists.And did the Bolsheviks create collective ownership like the Marxists wanted?
Lie. There is no such thing as 'State Capitalism'.No, instead they created State Capitalism which was more similar to economies that Fascists had in Germany, Italy, Austria, and Spain.
Now you're going to lie about Cuba.As for the Cuban Revolution, there are two important things to consider.
One brutal dictator replaced by another. Both implemented communism.First, Cuba already had a dictatorship.
It never was. A democracy is an unstable form of government. There are currently no democracies in the world today.If Democracy had been an option,
Down with democracy. Down with Democrats.the Left would have chosen that, but it wasn't.
Lie. There was no choice.There was no chance at a vote, like in Russia, so the Left was forced to choose between two Dictators. They chose the less shitty one.
Irrelevant.Secondly, the Revolution happened during the Cold War, which is why Cuba needed to be Authoritarian.
The United States is not an empire.They're an island country next to the American Empire
The United States was never the aggressor in Cuba.in a time when America was the aggressor.
No, you are just making shit up, liar.Russia and China have no excuse, but I totally understand why Cuba needed a government like this.
There is no democracy anywhere in the world today. No communist nation or fascist nation does better than capitalism. Socialism is theft.So why do countries with Social Democracy do better than America and other countries with Capitalism?
The both have 'collective' ownership, that is, ownership of businesses by the government.And why are countries like the Soviet Union and Maoist China considered Socialist when they did not have collective ownership?
California is one state. It's the exception, not the rule.
Coincides with the fact that 9 out of 10 poorest states in America are red states .. needing more government bailouts
WRONG .. that distinction goes to Mississippi and Louisiana.
Why are you still there if you hate it so much?
Obviously brother you don’t understand logic. I asked a question based on your constant crying about the state you live in. Moving isn’t that difficult. I used to live there .. I moved.
I live in America because I was born to it .. family lives here .. thus I’m committed to trying to make it live up to its promises.
A like answer from you would have sufficed.
Pardon me for using the OFficial measure of poverty, which is more widel used. .. but even by the SPM California ranks 26th.
Well duh, blue states do better than red states because of economics. Instead of wealth pooling within a tiny minority, it spreads more evenly throughout society.
I know it goes against the feels, but liberal economics produce better societies. And not just within America. Liberal countries are far more successful than conservative countries too.
If disagreeing with politics be they local, state or federal is crying then all we do in America is cry.
It's like in America today there's zero room for nuance. There's a lot about California I love. I also strongly disagree with many things we do here politically and yes I discuss them on a political discussion board. And as many of us know the old adage is 'as goes California so goes the country'. So if I lived in Montana and discuss local Montana politics most people understandably wouldn't give a sh*t. But California is the largest state in the Union and what happens here affects what happens around the country. And when people point to California and say I want to transport their politics nationally I will talk about it. That doesn't mean I hate California.
And not living here you probably don't read the local papers on a regular basis. Whether it's the SF Chronicle, LA Times or Sac Bee a google search will show you numerous articles they have written stating California has the highest poverty rate. Here's just one article.
California still No. 1 in poverty
https://calmatters.org/commentary/2019/09/high-cost-california-no-1-in-poverty/
One state. Literally one state. Like I said, California is the exception to the rule.
Look up legit any article on living standards, human development index, or economic security. The blue states, on average, do better than the red states.
Even in that one, the blue states are doing better than the red states on average.
Yes, I'm going by the overall number of states. On average, the blue states are doing better.
And really, is this surprising? Look at countries around the world. Would you rather live under right-wing economies like Saudi Arabia or left-wing economies like Switzerland?