Pennsylvania Legislature announces FULL FORENSIC AUDIT of 2020 election

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
This is far more than a recount. This means they will test for fraudulent ballots and there were millions of them in just this state. Pedodent Biden is going to prison.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/yuge-...-full-forensic-audit-as-democrats-run-scared/

july 7 2021 The Pennsylvania state legislature has announced a full forensic audit in their state similar to what is ongoing in the state of Arizona.

Sen. Doug Mastriano (R-Franklin) has threatened subpoenas to three counties demanding that they produce information that would allow the processes to be verified that were used during election night.

“As we go through the ballots, my desire is to recount them but also forensically analyze with photographic material whether the ballots were copied or filled in by a human,” Mastriano said during a recent appearance on Steve Bannon’s podcast.

Mastriano is planning to study the type of paper that was used for the ballots, and to look for “shenanigans” with regards to vote-tabulating software, and to review the chain of custody process for ballots.
Click to expand...
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
This is far more than a recount. This means they will test for fraudulent ballots and there were millions of them in just this state. Pedodent Biden is going to prison.
Click to expand...

Lol. Let's see how much cooperation he gets.

"Officials from three Pennsylvania counties -- Philadelphia County, York County and Tioga County -- confirmed to CNN that they received requests from Mastriano for election materials ranging from ballot tabulation equipment to voter rolls. The letters, which ask counties to turn over the materials voluntarily, request that counties respond with their plan to comply by July 31.

Officials for the counties said they were still determining how to respond. But Mastriano's requests drew a swift rebuke from Democratic leaders in the state Senate as well as the state attorney general.

"Although two legal audits have already been completed in Pennsylvania, Senator Mastriano is now requesting a laundry list of confidential and privileged information from three Pennsylvania counties in continued efforts to pay homage to former President Trump and further spread misinformation about our elections," Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro said in a statement, encouraging counties to refuse to participate.

Regardless of whether the audit moves forward, it won't upend the results of the 2020 election, which showed Joe Biden won the Keystone State by more than 81,000 votes, paving his path to the presidency."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...t-democrats-slam-as-political-ploy/ar-AALTufo
 
It has already had 2 audits. The election was clean and Trump lost by 80K.
You are such a foolish person. You believe everything Trumpys say and never question it.
 
PA is another state that was supposed to be a "battleground state" where the vote was close. But on early nov 4 trump had a huge 10 point lead with over 60% of the vote counted. Same thing in WI and MI. And then it all vanished. Millions of americans saw it and that's how we know there was massive fraud.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
PA is another state that was supposed to be a "battleground state" where the vote was close. But on early nov 4 trump had a huge 10 point lead with over 60% of the vote counted. Same thing in WI and MI. And then it all vanished. Millions of americans saw it and that's how we know there was massive fraud.
Click to expand...

What an idiot. County's out in the country have few voters and count their ballots quickly so when a redneck like trump runs he jumps out in front quickly. Now when you move to the urban areas that take much longer to count and they overwhelmingly vote for Biden he comes storming back. I watched those counties with 8000, 10,000 maybe 12,000 come in with a 25-30 point lead for trump but the cities have 80,000, 100,000 maybe 200,000 and their votes come in much later and its like a tidal wave of Biden votes. Nothing fraudulent about it.

We see it now every election in the state of Virginia, you see early votes rolling in and the republican is way out in front because it's all country and rural areas reporting. As soon as you get to the densely populated northern sections like Alexandria who report their votes much later because they have so many to count, the democrat runs away with it. If the states had counted the mail in vote first and reported those as soon as the polls closed Trump never would have had a lead.

I personally think your rightwing rag is full of shit and there will be no audit in PA. If there were it would be on the front page of every reputable paper in the country but it's not. Papers like the one you cite are preying on dumbshits who search for such bullshit to paste in forums to make asses out of themselves.
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
Are the Q-uacks going to do the forensic testing?
Click to expand...

It won't be forensic testing at all. Neither is the farce in Arizona a forensic audit; it's an "investigation" by people who are both amateurs and under the direction of biased leadership, factors that completely disqualify it.

We'll see how far the Pennsylvania subpoenas succeed.
 
martin said:
It won't be forensic testing at all. Neither is the farce in Arizona a forensic audit; it's an "investigation" by people who are both amateurs and under the direction of biased leadership, factors that completely disqualify it.

We'll see how far the Pennsylvania subpoenas succeed.
Click to expand...

Why are democrats so suddenly afraid of investigations?
 
martin said:
It won't be forensic testing at all. Neither is the farce in Arizona a forensic audit; it's an "investigation" by people who are both amateurs and under the direction of biased leadership, factors that completely disqualify it.

We'll see how far the Pennsylvania subpoenas succeed.
Click to expand...

I see democrats have their ‘insurance policy’ talking point in place in case things go south in AZ lol.

I actually don’t know enough about the AZ audit to do anything but venture a guess about the outcome and I’m not going to guess. I do know this: the fact media and our government insists that there was no fraud—doesn’t carry as much weight as it used to.

So I’m going to wait and see.
 
Darth Omar said:
I see democrats have their ‘insurance policy’ talking point in place in case things go south in AZ lol.

I actually don’t know enough about the AZ audit to do anything but venture a guess about the outcome and I’m not going to guess. I do know this: the fact media and our government insists that there was no fraud—doesn’t carry as much weight as it used to.

So I’m going to wait and see.
Click to expand...

In a forensic audit if there are competing outside interests, as in the outcome of an election, both sides are involved and the result is then determined by a court. Look it up.
 
martin said:
In a forensic audit if there are competing outside interests, as in the outcome of an election, both sides are involved and the result is then determined by a court. Look it up.
Click to expand...

Well the court isn’t out of the loop yet and what if one side refuses to take part in it?
 
Darth Omar said:
Well the court isn’t out of the loop yet and what if one side refuses to take part in it?
Click to expand...

Any side is entitled to refuse to take part if the audit is not independent:

"Under SSFS 1, forensic services provided for “investigation” or “litigation” are defined as follows:

Investigation is a service performed in response to concerns of wrongdoing in which the member is engaged to perform procedures to collect, analyze, evaluate, or interpret certain evidential matter to assist the stakeholders (for example, client, board of directors, independent auditor, or regulator) in reaching a conclusion on the merits of the concerns."

https://www.aicpa.org/press/pressre...sional-standards-for-forensic-accounting.html

The Arizona farce couldn't be less independent.
 
Darth Omar said:
You get points for knowing the distinction between a simple audit and a forensic audit.
Click to expand...

If Republicans want to examine the results and make a finding, okay but don't call it a "forensic audit". I don't understand why a smart guy like you doesn't see this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top