Penn State did the right thing where Catholic Church failed!

WinterBorn said:
As opposed to a hate monger who maintains it is not normal, not natural, not moral, and not healthy, despite being schooled repeatedly that he is wrong??
Click to expand...

I can't tell you how much it annoys me that people allow them to put it in such a box.

Almost nothing humans do is "normal" or "natural"...

If it is immoral to do something unnatural, we should give up our cars, our houses, farming, domesticating animals, wearing clothes, roads, schools, reading, airplanes...

It's stupid to try to say that because something that somebody is doing is "unnatural" we shouldn't let people adopt. Almost EVERYTHING we do is unnatural.
 
Last edited:
Damocles said:
I can't tell you how much it annoys me that people allow them to put it in such a box.

Almost nothing humans do is "normal" or "natural"...

If it is immoral to do something unnatural, we should give up our cars, our houses, farming, domesticating animals, wearing clothes, roads, schools, reading, airplanes...

It's stupid to try to say that because something in "unnatural" we shouldn't let people adopt. Almost EVERYTHING we do is unnatural.
Click to expand...

Exactly and who gets to define "normal"

Let it be me.
 
Damocles said:
I can't tell you how much it annoys me that people allow them to put it in such a box.

Almost nothing humans do is "normal" or "natural"...

If it is immoral to do something unnatural, we should give up our cars, our houses, farming, domesticating animals, wearing clothes, roads, schools, reading, airplanes...

It's stupid to try to say that because something in "unnatural" we shouldn't let people adopt. Almost EVERYTHING we do is unnatural.
Click to expand...

Normal is relative to what others do, a measurement that does not appeal to me. Natural is basically primitive and animalistic. Moral is based on personal beliefs. And healthy is not even close to relevant.

But those have been the reason SM claims to hate gays and his reasons for saying gays should not be allowed to marry. I'll give him consistency, but only in his hatred.
 
DamnYankee said:
So your "proof" that I "hate" is that my logic is consistent. Awesome. :D
Click to expand...

Logic??? lmao

You wish to not allow gays to marry based on things that many (if not most) married straight people do. Yeah, great logic there.
 
DamnYankee said:
As you admitted you have no proof of the causation, so you should be more open-minded to my theory that sexual deviancy leads to other types of sexual deviancy, just like a drug addict seeks harder drugs over time.
Click to expand...

Both positions are illogical fallacies. And again, you produce no proof to back your claims. Weak.
 
Damocles said:
I can't tell you how much it annoys me that people allow them to put it in such a box.

Almost nothing humans do is "normal" or "natural"...

If it is immoral to do something unnatural, we should give up our cars, our houses, farming, domesticating animals, wearing clothes, roads, schools, reading, airplanes...

It's stupid to try to say that because something in "unnatural" we shouldn't let people adopt. Almost EVERYTHING we do is unnatural.
Click to expand...

Its perfectly natural for people to travel, first by walking, then using animals, then improving their paths and finally by inventing mechanized methods of travel. It's not natural to put your sexual organs in an orifice designed to evacuate waste.
 
I been telling you DY..... your rep is in the toilet. When you got the white folks calling your ass out, you know you're in deep doo doo. LOL.
 
DamnYankee said:
Its perfectly natural for people to travel, first by walking, then using animals, then improving their paths and finally by inventing mechanized methods of travel. It's not natural to put your sexual organs in an orifice designed to evacuate waste.
Click to expand...

So lesbians put their sex organ in an orifice designed to evacuate waste?
 
DamnYankee said:
Its perfectly natural for people to travel, first by walking, then using animals, then improving their paths and finally by inventing mechanized methods of travel. It's not natural to put your sexual organs in an orifice designed to evacuate waste.
Click to expand...

Vaginas evacuate urine, a waste product. And heterosexuals have anal sex.

Next?
 
DamnYankee said:
Its perfectly natural for people to travel, first by walking, then using animals, then improving their paths and finally by inventing mechanized methods of travel. It's not natural to put your sexual organs in an orifice designed to evacuate waste.
Click to expand...

Excuse me, don't women pee (a waste product) via their vaginas, and men via their penises? I guess you needed to be more specific as to what kind of waste, which, nevertheless, would render your position, null and void, in any event. The differences in apparati and orifices has to do with variation in plumbing, nothing more.
No doubt, a sexual organ has been put in your orifice that wasn't designed to "evacuate waste", but, in fact, "does"......your mouth.
 
DamnYankee said:
Your arguments fail, so roll out he ad homs, just like Poet, Rana, Onceler....
Click to expand...

and don't forget your stupid ass....or are you conveniently denying that you don't use ad homs, when you find yourself unable or unwilling to debate the merits? Hypocrite supreme.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top