Because they don't have the votes or public support and nobody can cite what Pence did wrong. Involved in the mess is not good enough.
Pelosi will have to pick a VP
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
Because they don't have the votes or public support and nobody can cite what Pence did wrong. Involved in the mess is not good enough.
Talking to Zelensky about some issue is not a crime since we have no idea what he said. Why do we all of a sudden believe what Trump said.
We have been hearing for three years they have the goods on Trump and none even came close. They will be lucky to impeach Trump but they cannot convict him and certainly cannot convict Trump. Partisan optimism--just like both sides are sure they are going to win the 2020 election.
Superfreak
Verified User
IF your hero Avenatti isn't already in jail, maybe you can get him to lie to the public again and then pretend he is a qualified candidate?
I dont think Avenatti is in jail. WRONG AGAIN!
Clinton was also impeached for obstruction of justice.
Superfreak
Verified User
Thanks for proving yet again what an idiot you are.
Superfreak
Verified User
He is not in jail, I just checked you fool.
Superfreak
Verified User
Moron. try reading what was written... you are a fucking idiot.
Superfreak
Verified User
Garud once again proving what we all know to be true... Garud is a fool.
Superfreak
Verified User
Now Garud is off on another thread asking about Avenatti. Because he is too stupid to do it in the thread it belongs. Poor Garud. Let's give him some time to realize he made a fool of himself yet again.
Superfreak
Verified User
It really doesn't get much easier than this. Poor demented moronic Garud.
Pence was pressing Trump's play to extort Ukraine into digging up dirt on Biden.
Trump literally said on camera that Pence met with Zalensky on September 1st (he had actually met Zelensky twice) and talked about "corruption"...in other words, to find dirt on Biden.
Why isn't it "good enough"...since he was involved, he should have to face consequences, no? Or are you of the position that he gets a mulligan?
Getin the ring
Verified User
pssst, just a heads up, you're posting in an "evince" thread
Superfreak
Verified User
Nothing more Garud?
What votes? What are you talking about?
There isn't a credible poll I've seen that shows more people oppose impeachment than support it since these bombshells started falling last week.
CBS/Marist, YouGov, SurveyMonkey...all three show at least a plurality support impeachment.
So what public support are you talking about? The imaginary public support you conjure in your own head?
You don't know that this is true. It is pure conjecture that he was talking about finding dirt on Biden. Trying to bring Pence into this would be a bad move by the Democrats for several reasons--they have no evidence (Trump saying Pence was talking about corruption is not an illegal act) and all their time and effort needs to be spent on Trump and not wasted on people like Pence. I am just predicting Pence will not be impeached. Democrats already have more than they can handle with Trump.
WHAT?
Trump said Pence spoke with Zalensky about nebulous "corruption".
Now that we know Trump was sending Barr out to jetset around the globe to dig up Biden dirt, that makes Pence's meetings and discussions with Zalensky an issue.
Per Trump's own words, they talked about "corruption".
"Corruption" in Trump world is code for Biden.
It's why Trump sent Barr all around the globe.
Don't be dumb.
Well, it is an illegal act if Pence was talking about "corruption" with Ukraine's President for the benefit of getting dirt on a political rival.
Hold on, Flash...TWO WEEKS AGO you were saying we shouldn't impeach Trump at all because...derp derp derpy doo. Because, in your mind, it would turn people against Democrats and generate sympathy for Trump. (Looks around) I don't see increased sympathy for Trump, I see increased anger at him and increased support for impeachment.
You're behind the curve. Well behind the curve.
What makes you think they have more than they can handle?
Maybe it's too much for you to handle, but not the Democratic Majority in the House.
Sounds to me like you're afraid that this conspiracy goes far deeper and is far broader, and you're not prepared to reconcile that with your BoTh SiDeS aRe ThE sAmE bullshit becuase you can't find an example of the other side doing what Trump, Pence, Barr, Pompeo, and all the rest have been doing this whole time...that we've been warning you about...remember? We've been warning you that Trump was abusing his authority and your response? BoTh SiDeS aRe ThE sAmE.
They don't have the votes to convict in the Senate. I don't know about impeachment in the House. YouGov and SurveyMonkey are internet polls. No self-selected poll is credible. It will need to be more than a plurality to generate public support that will affect congressional behavior.