It's the psychosis that you come across with, as well. Dano's thread yesterday was basically trying to refute global warming, period; not manmade global warming. But you jumped on it in the most insane way, with your usual 3-4 posts in a row calling us idiots & morons & linking studies about C02, not even commenting on Dano's usual thin science and cherrypicked info.
Personally, I've conceded the C02 argument. I actually don't think it's definitive either way, which you can take issue with, but I just see it as basically unproveable. As I mentioned before, some of the authors of your ice core study still see man as being an accelerator of the process, if not the instigator, but again, I think at this point that it's tough to prove either way. I also think that if it is C02 & man contributes more than we think, there probably isn't much we can do about it now anyway.
I will, however, continue to see fossil fuels as something that we need to transition from as quickly as possible, for a variety of reasons, including the environment & national security.
