Peckers

"I knew before I was even pregnant that I would not circumcise," said Query, 39, a San Francisco, California, filmmaker whose son was born in 2002. "It's not like you're just cutting a piece of paper off a pad -- there's no 'cut here' line. It's not made to be cut off, and I would never, ever do that to my baby."
Click to expand...

And if she saw my friend's wife now? After having two of her boys get infections at 3 years old and get circumcised at that much later date, she finally realized that there might be a logical reason for it and got the third circumcised at birth.
 
Beefy said:
I feel bad for the baby girls being born around now. When they come of age, they're going to have to deal with this horror:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/06/18/circumcision.decline.ap/index.html
Click to expand...
I really hope ypur comment was tongue-on-cheek.

Iam of the age that when I was born, most non-jewish boys were not circumsized. thus, I an still completely whole. and I an glad it is that way. I don't approve of the practice, nor do I approve of tattoos, body piercings, etc.
 
Damocles said:
And if she saw my friend's wife now? After having two of her boys get infections at 3 years old and get circumcised at that much later date, she finally realized that there might be a logical reason for it and got the third circumcised at birth.
Click to expand...
I would venture a guess that the infections were not due to the natural formation of the boy's bodies, but rather to cleanliness factors, which were not considered.
 
doniston said:
I would venture a guess that the infections were not due to the natural formation of the boy's bodies, but rather to cleanliness factors, which were not considered.
Click to expand...
The doctor told her it was not uncommon to get infections when a young male was not circumcised. I'll believe the doctor. It doesn't matter to me anyway, it's likely her kid will be fine. But there is more than one reason to circumcise.
 
Yes infection can be a problem, some people are more prone to infections of Any kind than others.

My son got the modern kind where they put a ring around the head which cuts off the circulation to the foreskin and it becomes numb very quickly and then you leave it on for a few days and then it falls off with not cut marks no mess no fuss.

He never even flinched.

I think the mans penis is much more attractive without the skin.

Im sure yours is beautiful though Donnie.
 
The debate escalated in February, when studies found that heterosexual men in Africa who were circumcised had HIV infection rates up to 60 percent lower than uncircumcised men. Because of those studies, the American Academy of Pediatrics is taking another look at its policy.

an important fact in the article
 
Damocles said:
The doctor told her it was not uncommon to get infections when a young male was not circumcised. I'll believe the doctor. It doesn't matter to me anyway, it's likely her kid will be fine. But there is more than one reason to circumcise.
Click to expand...
No, I don't imagine it "IS" all that uncommon, but the question is why? could it be the fault of the mother??? and could it be the Doctor was just being kind, and non-judgemental????
 
Desh said:
Yes infection can be a problem, some people are more prone to infections of Any kind than others.

My son got the modern kind where they put a ring around the head which cuts off the circulation to the foreskin and it becomes numb very quickly and then you leave it on for a few days and then it falls off with not cut marks no mess no fuss.

He never even flinched.

I think the mans penis is much more attractive without the skin.

Im sure yours is beautiful though Donnie.
Click to expand...
HA HA HA,

Strange, but I've never been subject to that comment before.
 
Desh said:
The debate escalated in February, when studies found that heterosexual men in Africa who were circumcised had HIV infection rates up to 60 percent lower than uncircumcised men. Because of those studies, the American Academy of Pediatrics is taking another look at its policy.

an important fact in the article
Click to expand...
Now that is understandable, but still likely a cleanliness problem. Further, if condums are used, what difference would it make???
 
doniston said:
HA HA HA,

Strange, but I've never been subject to that comment before.
Click to expand...

And you never will be again. Circumcise the babies. They'll thank you for it. No woman wants to suck on a popsicle stick with the wrapper still on it.
 
Doniston, if it were circumscised there would simply never be any reason to even WORRY about cleanliness. One of the most remarkable things about the circumscized penis is it's beautiful simplicity, which puts it at an advantage to the vagina. It gets hard, and you can have sex. You also pee out of that same hole. No upkeep whatsoever. It's one of God's greatest inventions. Messing it up unnecessarily and requiring unnecessary cleanliness takes away from our rugged manliness.

God didn't necessarily mean for that to be there. After all, he told the Jews to get one. Ever heard of the appendix, anyway?
 
Desh said:
Yes infection can be a problem, some people are more prone to infections of Any kind than others.

My son got the modern kind where they put a ring around the head which cuts off the circulation to the foreskin and it becomes numb very quickly and then you leave it on for a few days and then it falls off with not cut marks no mess no fuss.

He never even flinched.

I think the mans penis is much more attractive without the skin.

Im sure yours is beautiful though Donnie.
Click to expand...

I honestly don't know if I got that. I have no cut marks, though, so I guess I did. Are cut marks common?

I actually didn't even know what a circumscision was until I went to a predominantly black church and the preacher said he preferred the Christian way of getting God's grace to the old Jewish, physical way, circumcision...

And so I asked my dad about it.
 
Watermark said:
I honestly don't know if I got that. I have no cut marks, though, so I guess I did. Are cut marks common?

I actually didn't even know what a circumscision was until I went to a predominantly black church and the preacher said he preferred the Christian way of getting God's grace to the old Jewish, physical way, circumcision...

And so I asked my dad about it.
Click to expand...
There are no scars unless someone screwed up.

Uncircumsized, the head is covered with the foreskin, when relaxed.

Circumsized, there is virtually no foreslin, which desensitizes that portion, because it is always open to the elements.

In erection, there is virtually no difference in appearance. the foreskin disappears into the neck of the head.
 
Say What!!!

Watermark said:
Doniston, if it were circumscised there would simply never be any reason to even WORRY about cleanliness. One of the most remarkable things about the circumscized penis is it's beautiful simplicity, which puts it at an advantage to the vagina. It gets hard, and you can have sex. You also pee out of that same hole. No upkeep whatsoever. It's one of God's greatest inventions. Messing it up unnecessarily and requiring unnecessary cleanliness takes away from our rugged manliness.

God didn't necessarily mean for that to be there. After all, he told the Jews to get one. Ever heard of the appendix, anyway?
Click to expand...


Wash that puppie dude! wether or not it is circumsized... like any other parts of the body from stinky feet to armpits to the rear end! Cleanliness is next to Godliness....:rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top