Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
LOL. The people I saw posting this were pulling for Atlanta during the game. Not only do you nitwits live in a bubble you lack a sense of humor too.From Facebook:
![]()
LOL. The people I saw posting this were pulling for Atlanta during the game. Not only do you nitwits live in a bubble you lack a sense of humor too.From Facebook:
![]()
This certainly one of the more recent idiotic threads by a far right poster. Even the most elementary critical thinking and maths skills one would understand more Clinton supporters than Trump supporters in New England were pulling for the Patriots and I'm reasonably sure the opposite was True of Atlanta fans.
Where as most fans who's teams were not playing honestly don't give a $&@% who wins. They just want too see a good game and if somewhat more fans were pulling for Atlanta it had more to do with the Pats being the 800 lb gorilla of the NFL and not politics.
Having said that Tom Brady just bumped Montana, Bradshaw and Unitas as the best QB ever.
It's the other way around LR. Conservatives were to wrapped up watching the 700 Club or attending ice cream socials to watch the Super Bowl.I agree wholeheartedly with most of this. Besides the fact that most liberals were watching the Harry Potter reruns on the Freeform channel last night (not that there's anything wrong with that) rather than the Super Bowl.
34-28 Patriots, will the libs protest Patriots winning? Heaven forbid a team named Patriots should win a game let alone real American patriots making America great again.
Your response didn't answer as to why you would shop at a vacant store; but it does explain why you would try.![]()
This certainly one of the more recent idiotic threads by a far right poster. Even the most elementary critical thinking and maths skills one would understand more Clinton supporters than Trump supporters in New England were pulling for the Patriots and I'm reasonably sure the opposite was True of Atlanta fans.
Where as most fans who's teams were not playing honestly don't give a shit who wins. They just want too see a good game and if somewhat more fans were pulling for Atlanta it had more to do with the Pats being the 800 lb gorilla of the NFL and not politics.
Having said that Tom Brady just bumped Montana, Bradshaw and Unitas as the best QB ever.
Did you take the wrong meds again?
I saw Johnny U play a couple times. He back peddled like a crab in those hightopsI dunno, it's hard to eclipse Johnny U and Otto Graham.
True prior to 81 when they changed the rule it was harder for OL to block because placing your hands outside the frame of your body was holding and DB's could rape WR's so QB stats are grossly inflated when compared to that era.I dunno, it's hard to eclipse Johnny U and Otto Graham.
Well the argument for Brady being the best is during his career he has gone to the NFL championship game every other year on average and won 5 of them. Who else comes close?I think it's hugely unfair to use the SB as a bludgeon against older players/coaches/teams. For example, Starr/Lombardi won five championships, but only came away with SB I & II. Unitas barely crossed into the SB era, and didn't get to play during the 1967 when the Colts lost to the Jets.
But, if you want to talk about a guy who just did nothing but win, then Otto Graham is your guy.
Well the argument for Brady being the best is during his career he has gone to the NFL championship game every other year on average and won 5 of them. Who else comes close?
4 of those championships were in the old AAFC and not the NFL.From 1946-55, Graham won seven championships, and had a postseason record of 9-3. In fact, in his mere nine years, he won the first five consecutively, and then only didn't win it all three times from 1951-53.