It's got nothing to do with desperation. Again, let's compare. That's how we classify things. By comparison.
For example, if a person walks into a store, takes something and leaves without permission (paying for it) we call that theft because if a person took something from our home without permission it would be theft. We can compare.
Now, as for a "developing" human being it's like throwing an egg, flour,water and a few other ingredients in a pot and calling it a cake. It may become a cake if the ingredients are mixed and baked but it is not a cake at the present time even though it may contain all the ingredients of a cake.
Also, human beings have certain parts. A fertilized cell does not contain all the parts that human beings normally have. They develop. They come into existence at a later time.
You keep saying genetically proven. What makes genetics the defining definition? Genetics can prove my toe is human. Genetics can prove there is certain material present. That does not prove my toe a human being.
For a geneticist to claim something is a human being is nothing more than an arbitrary designation. They can prove something contains human material. That's where it stops.
The revolting thing about designating a fetus a human being is it dehumanizes every other human being, especially women by having the value of their life compared to something one can barely see.
That is the vileness of the comparison. Maybe you don't feel the life of your wife or daughter or sister or mother is worth more than a fertilized cell but most people do.
On the other hand if you do feel their lives are worth more then.....well, down the road we go towards two classes of human beings and I think a German fella tried that once.
So, Superfreak, which is it? Are the lives of your female family members not worth more than a fertilized cell or are you going down the other road?
