Paper in Nature proves a 15-year GW hiatus

It is painfully obvious that these people are totally unwilling to discuss the hiatus/pause. NOAA even tried to get rid of it altogether. Surprisingly Michael Mann contributed to that paper in Nature despite his earlier denial of a pause. At least he remembered that he's is a scientist after all.

I will not be allowing any Legion or any of the DC Munkies on future threads, it is truly pointless as they contribute nothing.
 
It is painfully obvious that these people are totally unwilling to discuss the hiatus/pause. NOAA even tried to get rid of it altogether. Surprisingly Michael Mann contributed to that paper in Nature despite his earlier denial of a pause. At least he remembered that he's is a scientist after all.

I will not be allowing any Legion or any of the DC Munkies on future threads, it is truly pointless as they contribute nothing.

Now he comes back with "Michael Mann" again, the same guy who in the "Guardian," the exact source you stated everyone knew was garbage, claimed that Hurricane Harvey was actually intensified by the same global warming you told us was in hiatus

And, in your attempt to deflect, did you noticed that in the fifty names in that letter that you think discredits NASA's finding only a couple two three were actually climate scientists?

Understandable why you would want to ban posters, your just too easy to discredit
 
Now he comes back with "Michael Mann" again, the same guy who in the "Guardian," the exact source you stated everyone knew was garbage, claimed that Hurricane Harvey was actually intensified by the same global warming you told us was in hiatus

And, in your attempt to deflect, did you noticed that in the fifty names in that letter that you think discredits NASA's finding only a couple two three were actually climate scientists?

Understandable why you would want to ban posters, your just too easy to discredit
Again fuck off Legion!
 
You cherry picked sites and failed to include uncertainties in order to bolster your lame claims. Scientific dishonesty

Calzone is definitionally incapable of scientific dishonesty, he is not a scientist. He is only capable of generic dishonesty. He has mastered it.
 
Back
Top