Monad Portal
Was it me?
the first black pope is quite a landmark moment.Because it was a thing for Francis. Leo XIV didn't make it a thing. Francis was making a point.
It's all good. I'm not saying either is "bad" just that these men are different.

the first black pope is quite a landmark moment.Because it was a thing for Francis. Leo XIV didn't make it a thing. Francis was making a point.
It's all good. I'm not saying either is "bad" just that these men are different.

Link to the claim Francis was making a point? The link I previously posted doesn't say but it does say he appeared within an hour of the white smoke which may indicate expediency over appearance.Because it was a thing for Francis. Leo XIV didn't make it a thing. Francis was making a point.
It's all good. I'm not saying either is "bad" just that these men are different.
^^^welcome to internet forums.
perfectly illustrating the destructivenss of the "topic drift" police.
I'm actually basing it on memory. When he was elected folks talked about how he was being "humble" and chose to eschew much of the Papal fanciness...Link to the claim Francis was making a point? The link I previously posted doesn't say but it does say he appeared within an hour of the white smoke which may indicate expediency over appearance.
That day, he made an appearance on the balcony of St. Peter's Basilica about an hour after white smoke filled the air outside of the Sistine Chapel, symbolizing his election.
www.americamagazine.org
Damo was right about Francis making a statement by forgoing the red cape. Here's a good explanation of everything.Correct as the video in this link displays: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...rancis-become-pope-election-2013/83192421007/
I don't know when the picture @christiefan915 showed was taken. From what I'm hearing, there's been issues with the sizes of vestments thus having new Popes make a choice on waiting for the vestments to be sized and delaying the appearance, or going out sooner sans vestments.
You were right about this.Because it was a thing for Francis. Leo XIV didn't make it a thing. Francis was making a point.
It's all good. I'm not saying either is "bad" just that these men are different.
I was hoping I wasn't going crazy... I'd hate to lose my memory. It is one of my most prevalent anxieties about aging...You were right about this.
"During his introduction in 2013, Pope Francis took a different route, forgoing much of the pomp and circumstance, to communicate an immediate desire for "simplicity," Morrill said. To many, Pope Francis' introductory attire was the first of many instances he would convey this message."
Laura Loomer is screaming he's a Marxist Woke Pope. People say all kinds of shit without it being true.I'm actually basing it on memory. When he was elected folks talked about how he was being "humble" and chose to eschew much of the Papal fanciness...
Folks like these:
The Washington Post (2013) noted that Francis’ appearance in a simple white cassock, without the red mozzetta or gold-embroidered stole, was part of a broader narrative of his “humble bearing” and “preference for a simple lifestyle.” Vatican spokesperson Federico Lombardi emphasized this simplicity, highlighting Francis’ minimal fanfare during his first public appearances.
Catholic News Agency (2013) reported on the significance of papal vestments, noting that Francis’ choice to forgo the red mozzetta was interpreted as a rejection of pomp, aligning with his desire to project a more accessible and less hierarchical image.
Here's a later story about his rejection of status symbols:
![]()
From the start, Pope Francis has rejected status symbols
Pope Francis told journalists, “How I would like a church which is poor and for the poor!”www.americamagazine.org
Anyway, it was a thing for Pope Francis. At least according to the folks reporting on it at the time, including the Vatican spokesperson. Federico Lombardi...