Pam Bondi: Releases Full Epstein Files with Full List of Names.......

Libhater said:
Just because someone's name is mentioned on the "Epstein List", it does not mean that they necessarily did anything wrong.

Trump and Melania are on the list, along with Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Reid Hoffman, Lex Wesner, and many others.

The Senate and House Judiciary committees noted that the names appeared in a "wide variety of contents," ranging from individuals who directly emailed Epstein or his associate Ghislaine Maxwell to those who had no interaction with either (like Trump for instance) but were referenced in the doccuments.

View attachment 74794View attachment 74792View attachment 74795
Click to expand...
1771200662271.png
 

Attachments

  • 1771200633218.png
    1771200633218.png
    287.3 KB · Views: 2
Matt Dillon said:
I never said that, retard. What I said was the investigation into Epstein and Maxwell was still ongoing the entire time Biden was president.
Click to expand...
Actually, you did appear to say that:

Libhater: ,Oh how you libs don't care that biden never opened or released the epstein files.

Matt Dillon: Well, there is a logical explanation for that. There was still an open investigation into him and Maxwell at that time.

A normal person uses a pronoun to reference someone previously mentioned. Biden was the person mentioned that the pronoun would refer to since the Epstein files are not a person. If you did mean to refer to Epstein, you would still be not truthful since Epstein was dead and was no longer being investigated when Biden was President.

Matt Dillon said:
It's a timing thing. Biden was a pedo, though.
The younger than puberty kind.
Click to expand...
There's that cult thinking showing through again on your part. Accusing Biden of being a pedo is cult delusions.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Actually, you did appear to say that:

Libhater: ,Oh how you libs don't care that biden never opened or released the epstein files.

Matt Dillon: Well, there is a logical explanation for that. There was still an open investigation into him and Maxwell at that time.

A normal person uses a pronoun to reference someone previously mentioned. Biden was the person mentioned that the pronoun would refer to since the Epstein files are not a person. If you did mean to refer to Epstein, you would still be not truthful since Epstein was dead and was no longer being investigated when Biden was President.


There's that cult thinking showing through again on your part. Accusing Biden of being a pedo is cult delusions.
Click to expand...
STFU, Tardo McLardo. I was telling it like it is and you gotta go and be an absolute dipshit.
Did you look at any of the Epstein files yet, or you're not smart enough to?
Tell ya what, I saw this black dude on Twitter that said he did, and he wishes he hadn't.
Yeah, there's some sick people in this world, evil. I do not want to see it.
I know it's all Frazzledrippy and like that. :(
 
Last edited:
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Poor Matt, it appears the cult has so eaten his brain he can no longer use English properly and is now upset that someone noticed.
Click to expand...
Go read all the Epstein files and watch all the videos, shitneck.
You're not even smart enough to be able to do that.
STFU you fucking punkass bitch.
I am, but I know better, because there's some very sick stuff in there.
I wanna see firing squads, to be honest.
You fucking dipshit. I bet you have a link to "Orange Man Bad" but not any real Epstein files, huh?
Yeah, you won't even try to look, so I don't have to warn you about anything.
Fucktard.
 
Lionfish said:
Link?
Click to expand...
You link first, since you made the first claim. A poster is not a source, lionfish.

However, I will call you out. From <reason.com/2026/02/11/a-viral-story-claims-an-ice-worker-was-caught-in-a-child-sex-trafficking-sting-the-truth-is-much-stranger/?utm_source=copilot.com>

1. Bloomington, MN “child sex trafficking sting” (2025–2026)​

These operations were widely described by politicians and headlines as “child sex trafficking stings,” but the underlying facts show something very different:

• 2026 sting — 30 arrests, 0 trafficking victims rescued​

This operation (“Operation Lookin’ for Love in All the Wrong Places”) involved undercover officers posing as adult sex workers.
  • 28 arrests were misdemeanors
  • 2 were felonies due to prior records
  • No trafficking victims were found or rescued

• 2025 sting — 16 arrests, 0 trafficking victims rescued​

This was the sting where a civilian ICE employee was arrested for soliciting a 17‑year‑old decoy.Again, no actual minors were present, and no children were rescued.

2. No Minnesota operation in the search results involved CBP at all​

CBP (Customs & Border Protection) does not appear in any Minnesota‑based enforcement actions in the reporting we found.

3. Why the confusion?​

Politicians and some media outlets often label these stings as “sex trafficking” operations, but the details show they are vice stings, not trafficking rescues.

The 2026 article explicitly notes:
  • “Minnesota politicians may be calling this a ‘sex trafficking sting,’ but… it’s just a vice operation.”
  • “No one was arrested on sex trafficking charges.”

Bottom line​

ICE and CBP did not rescue any children from sex traffickers in Minnesota in the operations reported.​

The stings involved undercover officers posing as minors or sex workers, and no actual trafficked children were identified or recovered.
 
Libhater said:
View attachment 74882


SUCK ON THAT ONE DUNCE BOY!
Click to expand...
^^^
More proof Hater isn't a Christian. Sad.

akamar.jpg
 
Jake Starkey said:
You link first, since you made the first claim. A poster is not a source, lionfish.

However, I will call you out. From <reason.com/2026/02/11/a-viral-story-claims-an-ice-worker-was-caught-in-a-child-sex-trafficking-sting-the-truth-is-much-stranger/?utm_source=copilot.com>

1. Bloomington, MN “child sex trafficking sting” (2025–2026)​

These operations were widely described by politicians and headlines as “child sex trafficking stings,” but the underlying facts show something very different:

• 2026 sting — 30 arrests, 0 trafficking victims rescued​

This operation (“Operation Lookin’ for Love in All the Wrong Places”) involved undercover officers posing as adult sex workers.
  • 28 arrests were misdemeanors
  • 2 were felonies due to prior records
  • No trafficking victims were found or rescued

• 2025 sting — 16 arrests, 0 trafficking victims rescued​

This was the sting where a civilian ICE employee was arrested for soliciting a 17‑year‑old decoy.Again, no actual minors were present, and no children were rescued.

2. No Minnesota operation in the search results involved CBP at all​

CBP (Customs & Border Protection) does not appear in any Minnesota‑based enforcement actions in the reporting we found.

3. Why the confusion?​

Politicians and some media outlets often label these stings as “sex trafficking” operations, but the details show they are vice stings, not trafficking rescues.

The 2026 article explicitly notes:
  • “Minnesota politicians may be calling this a ‘sex trafficking sting,’ but… it’s just a vice operation.”
  • “No one was arrested on sex trafficking charges.”

Bottom line​

ICE and CBP did not rescue any children from sex traffickers in Minnesota in the operations reported.​

The stings involved undercover officers posing as minors or sex workers, and no actual trafficked children were identified or recovered.
Click to expand...
How did they get to MN in the first place?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top