Palin: I didn't `mess up' Paul Revere history

Cancel 2018. 3

<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Palin: I didn't `mess up' Paul Revere history

"I didn't mess up about Paul Revere," replied Palin, a paid contributor to the network.

"Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there. That, hey, you're not going to succeed. You're not going to take American arms. You are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual, private militia that we have," she added. "He did warn the British."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110606/ap_on_el_ge/us_palin

:palm:

uh....YES you did screw up palin and you screwed up again today
 
stop cracking on Sarah, where is the comedy without her?
Romney, shit he's holed up on version 20 of disputing Romney care.
 
it is hilarious how she first messed up...so she had to time to research it before this interview and obviously she didn't or she is plain dumb....she continued making incorrect statements

he was not riding to warn the british and he wasn't focused on keeping their guns, his goal was to warn the militia to prepare for battle

i have no doubt he supported the second, but that is not what is ride was about
 
Wow, you'd think she'd just claim that she misspoke or something. But apparently she's too stupid to even recognize her error.
 
Wow, you'd think she'd just claim that she misspoke or something. But apparently she's too stupid to even recognize her error.

"Because of that one episode, that one episode, that would turn an issue into what it has become over the last two years. I think that's ridiculous. That's one of those things, where that issue...that I don't read, or that I'm not informed, it's one of those questions where I like to turn that around and ask the reporters, 'Why would it be that there is that perception that I don't read?'" --Sarah Palin, ABC interview with Barbara Walters, Dec. 9, 2010
 
it is hilarious how she first messed up...so she had to time to research it before this interview and obviously she didn't or she is plain dumb....she continued making incorrect statements

he was not riding to warn the british and he wasn't focused on keeping their guns, his goal was to warn the militia to prepare for battle

i have no doubt he supported the second, but that is not what is ride was about

Do you comprehend the difference between something that is said "figuratively" and something that is intended "literally?" What Palin has explained, is that in a figurative sense, Revere WAS warning the Brits. Perhaps a better way to have put it was, he was "sending a message" to the Brits. That's all! She doesn't think (and didn't say) that Revere's ride was intended to alert the Brits! The ACT of his ride was intended to send a strong message to the Brits, and it did. Now if you just want to be a pinheaded "gotchya" fucktard, and crucify Palin over this, that's fine... as long as we know what you are!
 
Do you comprehend the difference between something that is said "figuratively" and something that is intended "literally?" What Palin has explained, is that in a figurative sense, Revere WAS warning the Brits. Perhaps a better way to have put it was, he was "sending a message" to the Brits. That's all! She doesn't think (and didn't say) that Revere's ride was intended to alert the Brits! The ACT of his ride was intended to send a strong message to the Brits, and it did. Now if you just want to be a pinheaded "gotchya" fucktard, and crucify Palin over this, that's fine... as long as we know what you are!

apparently you lack reading comprehension skills....because she absolutely doubled down on the statement and it was NOT figurative in the slightest....what weak apologist dixie

Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there. That, hey, you're not going to succeed. You're not going to take American arms. You are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual, private militia that we have," she added
 

June 6, 2011 | 3:04 am
Sarah Palin

You may have heard recently something about that Sarah Palin telling a reporter that Paul Revere warned the British on his famous rousing revolutionary ride.

Now, that so many Americans have wallowed in their smug confirmation that Palin is an idiot unqualified for anything but Paul Revere thinks about something paulreverefactsdotcomrepeating sixth-grade history, how far, wide and fast do you think the contradictory news will spread that the former governor of Alaska was indeed correct?

That the Republican non-candidate, in fact, knew more about the actual facts of Revere's midnight ride than all those idiots unknowingly revealing their own ignorance by laughing at her faux faux pas? How secretly embarrassing this must be, to be forced to face that you're dumber than the reputed dummy.


http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/was...alin-says-paul-revere-warned-the-british.html


Who you gonna believe ?
 
apparently you lack reading comprehension skills....because she absolutely doubled down on the statement and it was NOT figurative in the slightest....what weak apologist dixie

Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there. That, hey, you're not going to succeed. You're not going to take American arms. You are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual, private militia that we have," she added

Right, like I said, IN A FIGURATIVE SENSE! That's pretty much what she is saying, you are just too stupid and full of disdain for Palin to realize it. I'm not apologizing for Palin, she should have more clearly articulated her point, but I also ain't jumping on the Bash Palin Bandwagon, like a fucktard pinhead.
 
Right, like I said, IN A FIGURATIVE SENSE! That's pretty much what she is saying, you are just too stupid and full of disdain for Palin to realize it. I'm not apologizing for Palin, she should have more clearly articulated her point, but I also ain't jumping on the Bash Palin Bandwagon, like a fucktard pinhead.

dude, i've been against palin before it was popular to do so, from day one you ignorant tard. there is nothing figurative at all...that has to be the biggest hack apologist claim yet about this.

Part of his ride was to warn the British

was part of his ride to warn the british? yes or no
 
apparently you lack reading comprehension skills....because she absolutely doubled down on the statement and it was NOT figurative in the slightest....what weak apologist dixie

Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there. That, hey, you're not going to succeed. You're not going to take American arms. You are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual, private militia that we have," she added

:bleh::lol:

It was the part of his ride where he was captured.
 

June 6, 2011 | 3:04 am
Sarah Palin

You may have heard recently something about that Sarah Palin telling a reporter that Paul Revere warned the British on his famous rousing revolutionary ride.

Now, that so many Americans have wallowed in their smug confirmation that Palin is an idiot unqualified for anything but Paul Revere thinks about something paulreverefactsdotcomrepeating sixth-grade history, how far, wide and fast do you think the contradictory news will spread that the former governor of Alaska was indeed correct?

That the Republican non-candidate, in fact, knew more about the actual facts of Revere's midnight ride than all those idiots unknowingly revealing their own ignorance by laughing at her faux faux pas? How secretly embarrassing this must be, to be forced to face that you're dumber than the reputed dummy.


http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/was...alin-says-paul-revere-warned-the-british.html


Who you gonna believe ?

the guy who wrote that is an idiot and doesn't realize what she said

Part of his ride was to warn the British

was part of his ride to warn the british? was his ride about ringing bells and making she the second amendment was upheld? or was it about warning the colonist?

you fell for an inaccurate article bravo....should have done your research first
 
Less known, obviously, is the rest of the evening's events in which Revere was captured by said redcoats and did indeed defiantly warn them of the awakened militia awaiting their arrival ahead and of the American Revolution's inevitable victory. Palin knew this. The on-scene reporters did not and ran off like Revere to alert the world to Palin's latest mis-speak, which wasn't.--LA TIMES
 
Question: What would you call The Independent Payment Advisory Board, established by Obamacare?

I would call it the 'Independent Payment Advisory Board' that is specifically prohibited by law from recommending any policies that ration care, raise taxes, increase premiums or cost-sharing, restrict benefits or modify who is eligible for Medicare.
 
yeah, that was all part of the plan

idiot
How secretly embarrassing this must be, to be forced to face that you're dumber than the reputed dummy.
pokeowned.gif
 
I would call it the 'Independent Payment Advisory Board' that is specifically prohibited by law from recommending any policies that ration care, raise taxes, increase premiums or cost-sharing, restrict benefits or modify who is eligible for Medicare.

IPAB would recommend policies to Congress to help Medicare provide better care at lower costs. This could include ideas on coordinating care, getting rid of waste in the system, incentivizing best practices, and prioritizing primary care.

Do I detect a little double talk here ????
 
Back
Top