Palin angered by 'sexist' Newsweek cover

Topspin

Verified User
Palin angered by 'sexist' Newsweek cover

Tue Nov 17, 2:41 pm ET
For the second time since Sarah Palin stepped into the national political spotlight, a photo of the former Republican vice-presidential candidate featured on the cover of Newsweek magazine is sparking controversy. Palin herself blasted the "out-of-context" cover as "sexist" on her Facebook page.



Originally published in the August 2009 issue of Runners World, the photo features the former Alaska governor in short runner's shorts. It was part of a multi-photograph slideshow that accompanied an article about Palin and her love for the sport titled, "I'm A Runner." In her Facebook post late last night, Palin took issue with Newsweek using a photo from an article about health and fitness to promote an analysis piece contemplating her relevance as a political figure:


"The choice of photo for the cover of this week's Newsweek is unfortunate. When it comes to Sarah Palin, this "news" magazine has relished focusing on the irrelevant rather than the relevant. The Runner's World magazine one-page profile for which this photo was taken was all about health and fitness -- a subject to which I am devoted and which is critically important to this nation. The out-of-context Newsweek approach is sexist and oh-so-expected by now. If anyone can learn anything from it: it shows why you shouldn't judge a book by its cover, gender, or color of skin. The media will do anything to draw attention -- even if out of context.

The reaction to the Newsweek cover has predictably sparked outrage from conservative supporters of Palin and kudos from liberals who oppose her. CBN commentator David Brady called the cover "a new low" for the "biased" magazine, adding that Newsweek has a history of portraying liberal women as "heroes for the next generation," while portraying conservative women like Palin as "nuts and dopey." Meanwhile, documentary photographer Nina Berman hailed the cover as "brilliant" and "shrewd" for using a "propped photo where Palin is an obvious participant ... to show how far out she is willing to travel on the road of self promotion" while "shield[ing] themselves from what would have been the inevitable criticism if they had dolled her up themselves and posed her the same way."

The current cover flap isn't the first time Newsweek has generated controversy with a photograph of Palin. The October 13, 2008, issue featured an extreme close-up of Palin that seemed to be devoid of the high-tech retouching often employed by magazines. Conservatives claimed this highlighted some of Palin's supposed "flaws," like wrinkles around her eyes.

Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham told Yahoo! News that the photo choice was simply the "most interesting image available":


"We chose the most interesting image available to us to illustrate the theme of the cover, which is what we always try to do. We apply the same test to photographs of any public figure, male or female: does the image convey what we are saying? That is a gender-neutral standard."

-- Brett Michael Dykes is a contributor to the Yahoo! News Blog
 
Palin is correct. The wingnuts are, true to form, pegging the outrage meter at 11 over it but they have a point. You won't see a magazine cover of any male shameless self-promoter (all politicians are) like that. You didn't see Guiliani in drag on the cover of Newsweek.

What's worse is that the Newsweek folks apparently included this on the inside pages:

sexist3.jpg


It's a disgrace. For a good analysis go here (Media Matters defending Palin?!?):

http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911170027
 
Palin is correct. The wingnuts are, true to form, pegging the outrage meter at 11 over it but they have a point. You won't see a magazine cover of any male shameless self-promoter (all politicians are) like that. You didn't see Guiliani in drag on the cover of Newsweek.

What's worse is that the Newsweek folks apparently included this on the inside pages:

sexist3.jpg


It's a disgrace. For a good analysis go here (Media Matters defending Palin?!?):

http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911170027

yeah, when a leftwing group like mediamatters defends a rightwing Politician against your actions, that should tell you that a line was certainly crossed. Newsweek should run an apology on the cover of their next issue.
 
Newsweek's coverage was sexist and in bad taste, but let's not get carried away here.
If they make it appear as if she is being persecuted for ideas she'll gain support you will wish she hadn't. Just a suggestion, sometimes it is better to let the "enemy" do what they will rather than constantly be on the attack.

And, while I don't want to feed the idea that I am a misogynist, she has some nice legs...

:D
 
Letters@newsweek.com

I would suggest everyone here write to Newsweek to express their opinion on this issue. I think the mediamatters response is the appropriate one. You don't have to like Sarah Palin or her ideology, but this type of hit should be unacceptable.
 
mediamatters defending Palin..
hell they probably had their grubby little hands in the Newsweek rag picking the picture..
I still wouldn't go to the mediamatters site and any sane person wouldn't either.

this is how the disgusting lefties do things and it will never change..you would think the people would wake up and see this..
 
Last edited:
Women wear dresess and show their legs, would it be sexist to show a picture on a magizine cover?


Her legs are showing, big deal.


She winked at an audience during a vice presidents debate. She insulted every woman in America when she did that.
 
Women wear dresess and show their legs, would it be sexist to show a picture on a magizine cover?


Her legs are showing, big deal.


She winked at an audience during a vice presidents debate. She insulted every woman in America when she did that.

evince luv ya, but your a partisan hack on this one
 
Women wear dresess and show their legs, would it be sexist to show a picture on a magizine cover?


Her legs are showing, big deal.


She winked at an audience during a vice presidents debate. She insulted every woman in America when she did that.

So you have no problem with the doll photo either?
 
She posed for it.

She trashed womens rights long ago with her winking, hair flipping and utter unprepairedness for the office she was seeking.

She is a completely uncurious mind who is seeking fame and money. Palin does not give a rats ass about the public who love her. They are to her a paycheck and adoration.
 
She posed for it.

She trashed womens rights long ago with her winking, hair flipping and utter unprepairedness for the office she was seeking.

She is a completely uncurious mind who is seeking fame and money. Palin does not give a rats ass about the public who love her. They are to her a paycheck and adoration.

there you go showing your ignorance again, woman can't be feminine. Shit you'd say the exact opposite if she were a democrat.
The country is more like wassilla than the elitist coast media types who trash her.
 
She posed for it.

She trashed womens rights long ago with her winking, hair flipping and utter unprepairedness for the office she was seeking.

She is a completely uncurious mind who is seeking fame and money. Palin does not give a rats ass about the public who love her. They are to her a paycheck and adoration.

She posed for that shot for an article on running in a RUNNERS magazine. Newsweek using that photo was done to objectify her. Period.

You are such a hack.
 
Flirting in a job search is not what women consider furthering womens rights.

Man you just cant grasp this whole thing huh?
 
She posed for that shot for an article on running in a RUNNERS magazine. Newsweek using that photo was done to objectify her. Period.

You are such a hack.


She chose to have that image out there in the mist.

Do you think you would be so kind if they did it to Pelosi?
 
Back
Top