Our Next Congress will be Draining Much of the Political Swamp

You keep screaming about the swamp like it’s some external monster,
No, he's talking about draining the swamp because it's an internal monster.
but you talk exactly like a creature that grew there.
Are Democrats nothing more than a creature? Interesting thought!
Every reply you make drips like something that’s been living under a porch too long, half‑wild, half‑wet, fully convinced it’s winning a fight no one else is having.
Lie. Denial. Draining the 'swamp' affects everyone in the United States and even beyond it's borders, Zombie.
 
Lie. Denial. Biden/Obama committed four acts of treason:
* Giving weapons and supplies to the enemy in time of war.
* Inviting invasion of the United States.
* Calling for civil war against citizens of the United States.
* Espionage.

He also violated Titles 6, 8, 18, and 52 of the USC.

Mayorkas has also committed treason, by inviting invasion of the United States, Zombie.

✅ Did Biden or Obama commit “four acts of treason”?​

No. None of the claims listed meet the legal definition of treason under U.S. law.

What treason actually is (U.S. Constitution, Article III):

Treason is only:

  • Levying war against the United States, or
  • Giving aid and comfort to the enemy in a declared war.
Courts interpret this extremely narrowly.Political disagreements, immigration policy, foreign policy, or rhetoric do not qualify.

Now the claims:

“Giving weapons and supplies to the enemy in time of war.”

There is no declared war, and no evidence Biden or Obama armed an enemy of the U.S.Foreign aid, even controversial aid, is not treason.

“Inviting invasion of the United States.”

Immigration policy — even if someone hates it — is not treason. Courts have repeatedly ruled that immigration enforcement choices are policy disputes, not crimes.

“Calling for civil war against citizens.”

There is no evidence Biden or Obama ever called for civil war. This is political rhetoric, not a factual claim.

“Espionage.”

There is no evidence either committed espionage. No charges. No investigations. No indictments.

“Violating Titles 6, 8, 18, and 52 of the USC.”

These are broad criminal and administrative codes.No court has found Biden or Obama in violation of them.

Mayorkas “committed treason by inviting invasion.”

Again: immigration policy ≠ treason. Congress impeached him on policy grounds, and the Senate acquitted him.
 
You posting a dog killing a snake as proof of what’s happening to a political party is wild. That’s not analysis, that’s you pointing at wildlife and hoping symbolism will do the heavy lifting your argument can’t. If your evidence is a pet doing pest control, you’re not predicting the future, you’re narrating a nature clip.
Go learn what 'simile' means, Zombie.
 
No, he's talking about draining the swamp because it's an internal monster.

Are Democrats nothing more than a creature? Interesting thought!

Lie. Denial. Draining the 'swamp' affects everyone in the United States and even beyond it's borders, Zombie.
calling it affecting everyone doesn’t make your rant relevant, it just means your confusion has a bigger blast radius than your argument ever did.
 
As of April 2026, 43% of registered voters have declared a party affiliation—39.2 million Republicans and 45.4 million Democrats.

The Democrats certainly have a majority of the people who have declared a party affiliation. People who are unaffiliated (as I am) and those who are registered in minority parties are the majority...which I consider to be just great.

You are searching for shit to spew, TA. It doesn't look great. In fact, I looks like bullshit. Why not clean up your act? You are more than intelligent enough to do so.
Argument from randU fallacy. Random numbers aren't data, Doofan.
Did Biden or Obama commit “four acts of treason”? ...deleted remaining AI slop...
Yes, Zombie. I've already listed them.
 
Could be.

I doubt it will lead to more than two parties in our present system, though. Although I would welcome a complete change to a parliamentary system...with many parties contending rather than just two.
I think that'd be a very bad idea. The parliamentary system gave Germany Hitler. It has produced numerous extremist leaders in a number of nations simply because it can allow a small minority party the potential to become the leadership in a coalition. The US system is hardly perfect, but it does generally prevent that sort of thing from happening.
 
My suspicion is that it will lead to one or more of the following:

1. One or both parties being forced to adopt a more broadly accepted set of political views.
2. One of the two existing big parties becoming a minority party and replaced by something else, say like the Whig party.
3. Major civil unrest with a serious political reset coming out of it.
Could be. I am just about convinced that unless we do something to "make things fairer" we will have Door #3 in a way that will be as far reaching as The French or Russian Revolutions.
 
I think that'd be a very bad idea. The parliamentary system gave Germany Hitler. It has produced numerous extremist leaders in a number of nations simply because it can allow a small minority party the potential to become the leadership in a coalition. The US system is hardly perfect, but it does generally prevent that sort of thing from happening.
Perhaps...but perhaps our system is not actually preventing that sort of thing. Man of the concerns your side had about former president Obama and this side has about Trump...were/are motivated by fear that "our system" can be corrupted.

In any case, I would like to see the system changed for the better...however that can reasonably be imagined and reasonably be implemented. I am not a genius and I am not pretending I know what is better/possible...I am merely expressing a hope for America which ultimately is a hope for humanity.
 
Back
Top