Our First Retarded President?

Is this guy a retard? Or is this what passes for acumen in con circles? Is this guy even for real??

“A manly man don’t want it piled high with vegetables!” Cain exclaimed. “He would call that a sissy pizza.”

Seriously? And there are people supporting this guy huh? I guess he loads his pizzas up with some sort of meat-product, sausage no doubt, and then goes knocking on young girls' doors.

"Knock-knock."

"Who's there?"

"It's Herman Cain with a special delivery!"


“The more toppings a man has on his pizza, I believe the more manly he is,” Cain explained. “Because the more manly man is not afraid of abundance.”

“Is that purely a meat question?” GQ‘s Alan Richman asked.

“A manly man don’t want it piled high with vegetables!” Cain exclaimed. “He would call that a sissy pizza.”

The candidate later admitted that he doesn’t mind a few peppers and onions.

Staying on the topic of foods, GQ‘s Devin Gordon wondered what flavors his Republican rivals would be if they were ice cream. Cain has repeatedly said he would be black walnut.

Romney would be plain vanilla; Rick Perry would be rocky road; Ron Paul is “just not an ice cream flavor.”

“Michele Bachmann… I’m not going to say it,” Cain said. “I’m not going to say it.”

“Oh, come on!” Gordon pressed.
“Tutti-frutti,” Cain admitted. “I know I’m going to get in trouble!”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/11/...nt-want-a-veggie-pizza/#.TsFKG8Im7vw.facebook
 
Who the heck is asking them these questions?

Ron Paul has the right answer. Geebs... why do these people take some of these questions seriously?
 
Who the heck is asking them these questions?

Ron Paul has the right answer. Geebs... why do these people take some of these questions seriously?

I really don't think they're the major problem here Damo.

"Knock knock"

"Who's there?"

"Did someone order a pizza with extra sausage?"

"uh no"

"Well open up cause it's Herman Cain's with a big surprise for you baby"
 
I really don't think they're the major problem here Damo.

"Knock knock"

"Who's there?"

"Did someone order a pizza with extra sausage?"

"uh no"

"Well open up cause it's Herman Cain's with a big surprise for you baby"


So the notion and idea that people in America are innocent until proven guilty, is completely lost on you? It doesn't bother you in the least, that Cain has never been charged with sexual harassment? No court has ever reviewed evidence, and he has repeatedly denied these allegations, but here you are parading around with your snide comments which seem to indicate you have convicted the man in your own mind.
 
So the notion and idea that people in America are innocent until proven guilty, is completely lost on you? It doesn't bother you in the least, that Cain has never been charged with sexual harassment? No court has ever reviewed evidence, and he has repeatedly denied these allegations, but here you are parading around with your snide comments which seem to indicate you have convicted the man in your own mind.

How dare I believe the women and not convict them as lying, money-grubbing, "bitches"!!

Damo, I demand I be banned for no less than one week for this outrage!
 
So the notion and idea that people in America are innocent until proven guilty, is completely lost on you? It doesn't bother you in the least, that Cain has never been charged with sexual harassment? No court has ever reviewed evidence, and he has repeatedly denied these allegations, but here you are parading around with your snide comments which seem to indicate you have convicted the man in your own mind.

Yeah, thats the way it always works in politics, isn't it?

But, while the pizza question was stupid, the answer was worse. The man you want to be president is concerned with the mnliness of a pizza??? WTF?
 
Yeah, thats the way it always works in politics, isn't it?

But, while the pizza question was stupid, the answer was worse. The man you want to be president is concerned with the mnliness of a pizza??? WTF?

Right, exactly! How convenient to gloss right over that.

This sounds like an interview with someone who just suffered a catastrophic brain injury, but no worries!
 
How dare I believe the women and not convict them as lying, money-grubbing, "bitches"!!

Damo, I demand I be banned for no less than one week for this outrage!

How dare you assume that allegations = guilt.... If I get 3-4 guys here to post that you are an STD-riden slut of a whore who can't get enough... can we just all presume it must be true? That alright with you, sweetie?
 
How dare you assume that allegations = guilt.... If I get 3-4 guys here to post that you are an STD-riden slut of a whore who can't get enough... can we just all presume it must be true? That alright with you, sweetie?

I just assume they're talking about your mother, but sure, whatever.

This isn't a court of law. The presumption of innocence is important in a court of law. Everyone forms opinions outside of that court.

Mine is that he's as guilty as a dog.
 
Yeah, thats the way it always works in politics, isn't it?

But, while the pizza question was stupid, the answer was worse. The man you want to be president is concerned with the mnliness of a pizza??? WTF?

First of all, no... that's usually NOT how it works in politics, there is usually ample proof, undeniable proof, as a matter of fact, and in some cases, even that doesn't matter, if the candidate has a (D) beside his name and everyone loves him. Even when there is proof, undeniable proof, people like Anthony Weiner will try to hold on to their jobs, and their counterparts rally around them, until public outcry eventually forces them to step down. I've never seen anything like this before in my life, in politics or anywhere, where a few people can make allegations, never press charges, and the person is presumed GUILTY! Can you give me another example of it?

And yes, the pizza question was stupid beyond belief... but did GOP candidates ask the question? Did any of them indicate this was a pressing issue for them, or they were concerned with this? If so, I sure missed that.
 
It seems that this thread started out being about Cain's ridiculous answer about "sissy pizza". But now its about the presumption of guilt?

No one is trying to fine Cain or jail him. He is trying to convince us to help him attain one of the most important positions in the world. I look at everything and weigh every bit of information I get. This is not a courtroom, this is a man trying to sell himself to us as the best choice for the most powerful position in our nation.

I don't think he should get the job. Not for any one reason, but for several.
 
First of all, no... that's usually NOT how it works in politics, there is usually ample proof, undeniable proof, as a matter of fact, and in some cases, even that doesn't matter, if the candidate has a (D) beside his name and everyone loves him. Even when there is proof, undeniable proof, people like Anthony Weiner will try to hold on to their jobs, and their counterparts rally around them, until public outcry eventually forces them to step down. I've never seen anything like this before in my life, in politics or anywhere, where a few people can make allegations, never press charges, and the person is presumed GUILTY! Can you give me another example of it?

And yes, the pizza question was stupid beyond belief... but did GOP candidates ask the question? Did any of them indicate this was a pressing issue for them, or they were concerned with this? If so, I sure missed that.

Bill Clinton went thru something similar. The difference between the (D) and the (R) is because the voters for the Dems aren't as concerned with sexual dalliances as the Repubs are.
 
I just assume they're talking about your mother, but sure, whatever.

This isn't a court of law. The presumption of innocence is important in a court of law. Everyone forms opinions outside of that court.

Mine is that he's as guilty as a dog.

And that's exactly why people like you should NEVER be in power in America. You don't care about justice, the truth, facts or details... you only care about your precious political ideology, and everything else be damned.
 
And that's exactly why people like you should NEVER be in power in America. You don't care about justice, the truth, facts or details... you only care about your precious political ideology, and everything else be damned.

Actually Dixie, this thread is about a retard becoming President:

“A manly man don’t want it piled high with vegetables!” Cain exclaimed. “He would call that a sissy pizza.”

You want to keep trying to bury the lead, so to speak. Who could blame you?
 
Bill Clinton went thru something similar. The difference between the (D) and the (R) is because the voters for the Dems aren't as concerned with sexual dalliances as the Repubs are.

No, I'm sorry, but Bill Clinton DID NOT go through something similar. Virtually everything that was ever alleged of Clinton, had material basis. He had a long history of sexual misconduct, dating back to his days in Arkansas, there were lawsuits filed in court, evidence presented, and he was ultimately impeached for lying under oath in one of those lawsuits... so NO... nothing remotely close to that has happened with Cain. A few women have CLAIMED something, no formal charge has ever been made, no evidence has ever been produced, and the man has been publicly condemned on accusation alone. This is pretty much unprecedented.
 
No, I'm sorry, but Bill Clinton DID NOT go through something similar. Virtually everything that was ever alleged of Clinton, had material basis. He had a long history of sexual misconduct, dating back to his days in Arkansas, there were lawsuits filed in court, evidence presented, and he was ultimately impeached for lying under oath in one of those lawsuits... so NO... nothing remotely close to that has happened with Cain. A few women have CLAIMED something, no formal charge has ever been made, no evidence has ever been produced, and the man has been publicly condemned on accusation alone. This is pretty much unprecedented.

Before the proof was shown the allegations were taken as truth by the neocons, and that is a fact.

There is a bit more than vague allegations by a few women. The fact that the company paid these women meant there was at least some basis for their claims.
 
I just assume they're talking about your mother, but sure, whatever.

This isn't a court of law. The presumption of innocence is important in a court of law. Everyone forms opinions outside of that court.

Mine is that he's as guilty as a dog.

not to make you sound too much of a hypocrite, but if we say that the women are lying money grubbing whores, does that make US misogynists?
 
We've already had a real sexual predator in the Oval Office and the left defended him every step of the way. I don't see any problem here with mere accusations.
 
Back
Top