Orlando police may have killed several nightclub patrons

Police Admit Officers May Also Be Responsible For Gunning Down Orlando Nightclub Patrons

New details have emerged that may shed more light on the extreme casualty count in the Orlando nightclub killings. On Monday, Orlando Police Chief John Mina intimated that some of the victims may have been killed by officers trying to perform a rescue operation.

“I will say this, that’s all part of the investigation,” Mina said. “But I will say when our SWAT officers, about eight or nine officers, opened fire, the backdrop was a concrete wall, and they were being fired upon.”

A confidential law enforcement source close to the investigation said a crowd of up to 300 people within the club — combined with the complex layout of the structure — may have resulted in numerous patrons being struck by gunfire from officers, according to WFAA-ABC 8.

Mina stood by his decision to employ a tactical strike amidst the rising likelihood that a number of the dead were the result of “friendly fire” from officers.

“It was a hard decision to make, but it was the right decision,” he said. “Our No. 1 priority is on saving lives, and it was the right decision to make.”An off-duty police officer working security at the club was outside investigating an underage drinker when he heard gunshots inside the club. The off-duty officer then proceeded to run inside the club and exchange gunfire with Mateen, with three additional officers soon arriving to back up the off-duty cop, law enforcement sources told WFAA-ABC 8. As the officers fired at Mateen, he retreated into a bathroom toward the rear of the club with a number of hostages.

“Those additional officers made entry while the suspect was shooting,” Mina said. “They forced him to stop shooting and retreat to the bathroom where we believe he had several hostages.”

Isn't a popular anti gunner argument about more guns around means potentially more innocent people being killed????? i'm betting that they will accept these deaths at the hands of the police though.......
 
Isn't a popular anti gunner argument about more guns around means potentially more innocent people being killed?????

Is it? If I run into any "anti gunners" I'll ask.

Not sure anyone has said that police shouldn't have guns, though. Except you.

i'm betting that they will accept these deaths at the hands of the police though.......

Are you?

Then you're betting that nobody will sue if it's proved that their loved ones were killed by police instead of gun owner Omar?
 
Is it? If I run into any "anti gunners" I'll ask.
if you ever get out of your mothers basement, we'll all be stunned.

Not sure anyone has said that police shouldn't have guns, though. Except you.
then that would be their issue, wouldn't it.


Then you're betting that nobody will sue if it's proved that their loved ones were killed by police instead of gun owner Omar?

any lawsuit filed by family members will be summarily dismissed due to qualified immunity. people like zappa approve of police not being sued for doing their jobs, which must mean that killing innocent civilians is part of their job.
 
if you ever get out of your mothers basement, we'll all be stunned.

"We"? Channeling Pastor PiMPle? Don't be childish. If you can cite an "anti gunner" saying that armed police made a mass shooting worse, do so.

then that would be their issue, wouldn't it.

It's your issue. You think everyone should be armed at all times, except the police. And anyone who works for the government.

any lawsuit filed by family members will be summarily dismissed due to qualified immunity. people like zappa approve of police not being sued for doing their jobs, which must mean that killing innocent civilians is part of their job.

Think so?
 
Back
Top