Oregon Adds A New Gender Option To Its Driver's Licenses: X

How can science be applied to the notion that a man feels like a woman or vice a versa?
A more important question is "How can homosexuality be a leading topic in science?"

We've all heard it before: If you don't embrace homosexual behavior then you're anti-science.

With homosexuality, climate hysteria, and abortion rights dominating the headlines, how in the hell did we let the perverts infest the science community with this shit?
 
Does your ID status have to match your appearance? Serious question, not trying to be hateful.
If you are a woman that looks like a man to most random persons, do you have to also list male as your gender? Or do you list the X in this case? Are the public then expected to discern that she's not in fact a male and is gender X?
This would be in the context of something like the police asking witnesses to give a description. So, if some large percentage of people can not discern the X gender they will give a description that it was a male. Will this be useful? The police would be looking for a male and avoiding all X? Or will the police include X in their search because of this?

They will error on the safe side. They will include X in all searches for male suspects and include X in all searches for female suspects

Bam! Instant persecuted class!
 
Good, then you should have access to all the peer papers written on the subject, happy reading
We all have a pair of chromosomes in our cells. Females have two X chromosomes, males have an X and Y.
I know there is a small percentage of males that have an extra Y chromosome.
I also know that surgically changing one's penis to a vagina and taking hormone supplements doesn't alter the chromosome pattern in any of the billions of cells that make up our bodies.
I couldn't find any peer reviewed article that disputes that. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
That's not very complicated.
So I'm open to more knowledge. Please explain.
 
A more important question is "How can homosexuality be a leading topic in science?"

We've all heard it before: If you don't embrace homosexual behavior then you're anti-science.

With homosexuality, climate hysteria, and abortion rights dominating the headlines, how in the hell did we let the perverts infest the science community with this shit?

The dirty little secret is the left is projecting when they claim others are anti-science.

According to current scientific knowledge, abortion should be illegal because it entails killing human organisms. You can only get around that by contorting science.
 
It's complicated science, I thought at one time you were smart enough to understand science, I guess I was wrong.

there is no scientific basis for multiple genders. in fact, given that 99.99999% of the population happily identify with the gender commonly associated with their sex, there is a plethora of science debunking these modern day claims.
 
This isn't about hate, Shill. It's about practicality. When does this all stop? Can America accommodate an explosion of new gender classifications?

Richest country in the world they always say, so I dunno, we can probably have more than every one, cause we can??

Honestly I dunno what the answer is...

IMHO it seems crazy the gubment, the fed gubment is getting involved in bathrooms & what not...:dunno: Ozzie & Harriet must be rolling in their graves..
 
I'll ask again

Does your ID status have to match your appearance? Serious question, not trying to be hateful.
If you are a woman that looks like a man to most random persons, do you have to also list male as your gender? Or do you list the X in this case? Are the public then expected to discern that she's not in fact a male and is gender X?
This would be in the context of something like the police asking witnesses to give a description. So, if some large percentage of people can not discern the X gender they will give a description that it was a male. Will this be useful? The police would be looking for a male and avoiding all X? Or will the police include X in their search because of this?

They will error on the safe side. They will include X in all searches for male suspects and include X in all searches for female suspects
 
Good, then you should have access to all the peer papers written on the subject, happy reading
We all have a pair of chromosomes in our cells. Females have two X chromosomes, males have an X and Y.
I know there is a small percentage of males that have an extra Y chromosome.
I also know that surgically changing one's penis to a vagina and taking hormone supplements doesn't alter the chromosome pattern in any of the billions of cells that make up our bodies.
I couldn't find any peer reviewed article that disputes that. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
That's not very complicated.
So I'm open to more knowledge. Please explain.
What I thought.
 
You thought I had a life? You thought it was the weekend and Father's Day and I was busy?

Science is discovering more about sexuality and gender all the time, here's a little article on the very basics
https://www.google.com/amp/www.medi...r-expands-across-spectrum-rather-323956?amp=1
I have to pay for the other papers on this matter, the peer reviewed material that talks about the gender spectrum and sexuality, so you will have to educate yourself on the new findings and research.
 
HEEEEEERE'S PAT!

eb1abe5e53dac0b762d1810697b9284d.jpg
That's very insensitive of you, racist.
 
I have to pay for the other papers on this matter, the peer reviewed material that talks about the gender spectrum and sexuality, so you will have to educate yourself on the new findings and research.
Thanks for the info. Now I see why I couldn't find anything. I routinely use pubmed links to scientific journals such as Compendium or JAMA, e.g.
I'd never think to look in Medical Daily or Nature magazine which are geared to those with a room temperature IQ.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top