Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
PMP is lying again; what a shocker.
Orange Tweet is back!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
He's nothing but a dyslexic myna bird.
I think trump's just desperate to change the narrative from Sessions, Kushner and the team's ties to Russia.
Life is Golden
The Sage
All the cheating, fraud, wire-tapping -- and he still won.
That's the beauty of it all.
That's the beauty of it all.
you need to clarify/rebut. otherwise your editorializing is meaningless
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Is he?
http://www.nationalreview.com
So, Trump WAS wire tapped. They [whether Obama was culpable remains to be seen] did it initially under 'probable cause' but when it turned up nothing, they renewed it and kept...fishing, is the best word I think.
Do you really defend this bullshit?
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
So funny how libs believe everything about Russia and hookers, but immediately don't believe this.
Hilarious hypocrisy.
Hilarious hypocrisy.
Did you really expect different from a conservative website?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Only in Darth's world.
NR reports that Trump was allegedly wiretapped, so it's perfectly reasonable to tweet that Obama was responsible, is just like Nixon and a "bad guy."
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
That's just braindead.
You believe Trump, then? Because that's what you're saying here. You're with Trump that Obama definitely wiretapped.
"Asked about Trump's tweets on Saturday, a former senior US official with direct knowledge of investigations by the Justice Department under the Obama administration denied there was any such investigation of Trump or that his phones were tapped.
"This did not happen. It is false. Wrong," the former official said.
The official said clearly that Obama could not order this. It would have been taken to a judge by investigators, but investigators never did that, the former official said.
[video=cnn;politics/2017/03/04/trump-accuses-obama-wiretapping-nobles-newday.cnn]http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/04/politics/trump-obama-wiretap-tweet/index.html"[/video], which has not been verified, and the White House did not immediately return requests for comment Saturday morning. An Obama spokesman had no comment regarding Trump's claims."
"This did not happen. It is false. Wrong," the former official said.
The official said clearly that Obama could not order this. It would have been taken to a judge by investigators, but investigators never did that, the former official said.
[video=cnn;politics/2017/03/04/trump-accuses-obama-wiretapping-nobles-newday.cnn]http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/04/politics/trump-obama-wiretap-tweet/index.html"[/video], which has not been verified, and the White House did not immediately return requests for comment Saturday morning. An Obama spokesman had no comment regarding Trump's claims."
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I swear, we see apologism w/ every President - but the Trumpeteers really live on another planet.
He can't set the bar low enough. There is literally nothing they won't defend.
He can't set the bar low enough. There is literally nothing they won't defend.
You know it. I would love to see an investigation of this supposed wire-tapping even though I know they'll make the usual excuses when it's found out to be false.
There is a 180-degree difference between the characters of Nixon and Obama. I just can't imagine Obama doing something so illegal.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
He wouldn't. He did what he could for Hillary, but it would defy imagination that he'd do that.
This is another one of those "imagine if" things. If Hillary had been elected and was insinuating something like this, you can only imagine the reaction from the right. Same w/ the Russian connections. With a GOP congress, we'd already be in the thick of impeachment proceedings.
Life is Golden
The Sage
Wow. You really did drink the koolaid.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
LOL - because she doesn't think Obama is just like Nixon?
Amazing the libs will believe in "golden showers" and Russians lurking everywhere and any routine contact "collusion"
Krauthammer (who is an elitist,and no fan of Trumps put's it this way:
++
Charles Krauthammer said that the bureaucratic resistance to Trump is not comparable to a John le Carré spy novel, but rather shows the bitterness of those who didn’t want Trump to win.
I don’t think there is any question that the former president was intent on leaving behind landmines.
And you are right, the NSA stuff is curious. Normally, when NSA is listening in on a foreigner, they take great care to redact any American involved. The NSA is not supposed to spy on Americans. Here it was the reverse, and there was an obvious attempt as was reported in the New York Times to make sure that this was spread as widely as possible, that it would become a problem for the Trump administration. I wouldn’t call it the “deep state,” it gives it a le Carré feel that there is this ominous enemy of the United States hidden in bureaucracy. What this is, is the revenge of the losers. These are people who wanted to make trouble for an administration of a guy who they thought wasn’t going to win and shouldn’t have won, and to see what happens. That is what I think is going on. To some extent, it has happened in other administrations. But I think it’s more obvious and we are going to get to the bottom of it, because there are going to be a lot of investigations.
: http://www.nationalreview.com/corne...le-fighting-bureaucrats-bitter-democrats-lost
Krauthammer (who is an elitist,and no fan of Trumps put's it this way:
++
Charles Krauthammer said that the bureaucratic resistance to Trump is not comparable to a John le Carré spy novel, but rather shows the bitterness of those who didn’t want Trump to win.
I don’t think there is any question that the former president was intent on leaving behind landmines.
And you are right, the NSA stuff is curious. Normally, when NSA is listening in on a foreigner, they take great care to redact any American involved. The NSA is not supposed to spy on Americans. Here it was the reverse, and there was an obvious attempt as was reported in the New York Times to make sure that this was spread as widely as possible, that it would become a problem for the Trump administration. I wouldn’t call it the “deep state,” it gives it a le Carré feel that there is this ominous enemy of the United States hidden in bureaucracy. What this is, is the revenge of the losers. These are people who wanted to make trouble for an administration of a guy who they thought wasn’t going to win and shouldn’t have won, and to see what happens. That is what I think is going on. To some extent, it has happened in other administrations. But I think it’s more obvious and we are going to get to the bottom of it, because there are going to be a lot of investigations.
: http://www.nationalreview.com/corne...le-fighting-bureaucrats-bitter-democrats-lost
All you have to do is prove wire-tapping occurred. trump should be waving the evidence all over cyberspace if it's true.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
When are you going to prove collusion?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Let me guess: Trump isn't lying, right Darth? This is just another "unverified claim"?