Opinion: Hillary Clinton’s big ideas for tanking the US economy

anatta

100% recycled karma
he latest spin out of Washington is that stock-market declines over the last 10 days are due to Donald Trump’s surge in the polls. Wall Street tends to hate change, even when it’s positive. And Donald Trump may be seen as a change agent who will rattle the cages in Washington, and perhaps on Wall Street.

But something else is being overlooked here: Hillary Clinton’s economic agenda and the financial markets.

Hillary says she has a cabinet full of ideas. Unfortunately, most of them are dimwitted. Here are five that could hurt employment, growth and stocks.

1) Raise the minimum wage to $12 or even $15 an hour. Clinton might as well call this the Teenage Job Elimination Act. Even the liberal Congressional Budget Office recently estimated a $12 minimum would reduce the number of starter jobs by as many as 1 million. Seattle recently raised its minimum to $11 and is headed to $15. An assessment by the University of Washington finds that so far that move had the “negative unintended consequence” of fewer hours worked and fewer jobs.

2) Hike taxes. There isn’t an economic philosophy known to man that says raising taxes will help the economy. But Hillary wants to give it a try, to the tune of $1.5 trillion sucked out of the economy.e isn’t an economic philosophy known to man that says raising taxes will help the economy. But Hillary wants to give it a try, to the tune of $1.5 trillion sucked out of the economy.

Under her plan, the federal income-tax rate would rise to above 45 percent, and the death tax would go to 65 percent for the very rich. Capital-gains taxes would nearly double.

History proves raising tax rates is the least effective way for the government to raise revenue. IRS statistics indicate that most of the people who fall into the top 2 percent of income are small-business owners — and they are America’s major employers. Tax them more, and they’ll employ fewer.

In the 1980s when income-tax rates were slashed from 70 percent to 28 percent, the amount of tax revenues over the decade doubled, and the share of taxes paid by the rich increased. All you have to do is look at the high-tax states like Connecticut, Illinois and New York and you can see the jobs and people fleeing.

Our highest-in-the-world business-income-tax rate has caused companies like Burger King and Johnson Controls to head to more tax-hospitable climes. Hillary’s plan may speed up this exodus.

3) Subsidize 500 million solar panels. We tried these green-energy handouts under President Obama, and they failed. Remember Solyndra? That firm received some $500 million of taxpayer dollars and then went belly up.

The Institute for Energy Research estimates a price tag of $200 billion for these solar panels. That’s more than it cost to put a man on the moon during the Apollo project.

Let the free market pick the next great energy source, which may be clean-burning natural gas.

4) Offer free college tuition. One of the greatest financial scandals in America today is the cost that universities and colleges are charging students and their families. Some colleges now charge $60,000 a year for room, board and tuition, and the average cost is near $30,000. But if students and families aren’t paying these costs, taxpayers will have to, and costs will spike even higher.

Universities will raise tuition, as they have every time the government has provided more subsidies.

Better to require every school to freeze tuition as a condition of receiving federal aid. Purdue has done this. Why not require schools with billion-dollar-plus endowments to use some of that money to lower the tuition for families?

5) Increase Social Security benefits. Hillary wants to fatten benefits to certain senior citizens and raise the Social Security tax to “pay for it.” Really? The system is already tens of trillions of dollars in the red, according to the Social Security Administration’s actuaries. Now we are going to increase the outflow and make even bigger benefit promises? She would also apply the payroll tax of 12.4 percent on wages of up to $250,000 (up from about $110,000 today), which would be one of the biggest tax hikes of all time.

Trump would cut taxes, reduce regulation, produce more American energy, provide school vouchers for families in failing school districts and kill ObamaCare. If Wall Street thinks this agenda is worse for stocks than Hillary’s tax- spend-and-subsidize agenda, the country’s in even worse shape than I thought.
 
if she wins, I wonder which accent she'll use after the inauguration. she loves that southern accident she pretended to have for a while. then she went back to the NY accent, then back to southern at her rally down south. most likely, she'll bust out the Hispanic accent today just to be safe.
 
Trump's corporation tax rate of 15% is a great way to get the two trillion that is currently overseas repatriated back to the mainland. Better to get 15% of that rather than 35% of nothing.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Trump's corporation tax rate of 15% is a great way to get the two trillion that is currently overseas repatriated back to the mainland. Better to get 15% of that rather than 35% of nothing.

wanking.gif


Yeah.....tax-cuts.....whatta revolutionary-idea.....


http://zzpat.tripod.com/cvb/dec_2007/tax_cuts_dont_boost_revenue.html

*
http://www.businessinsider.com/bush-era-tax-cuts-didnt-fix-economy-2012-12
 
Trump's corporation tax rate of 15% is a great way to get the two trillion that is currently overseas repatriated back to the mainland. Better to get 15% of that rather than 35% of nothing.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

if you do the 15% and close the loopholes you actually raise their rates.
 
he latest spin out of Washington is that stock-market declines over the last 10 days are due to Donald Trump’s surge in the polls. Wall Street tends to hate change, even when it’s positive. And Donald Trump may be seen as a change agent who will rattle the cages in Washington, and perhaps on Wall Street.

But something else is being overlooked here: Hillary Clinton’s economic agenda and the financial markets.

Hillary says she has a cabinet full of ideas. Unfortunately, most of them are dimwitted. Here are five that could hurt employment, growth and stocks.

1) Raise the minimum wage to $12 or even $15 an hour. Clinton might as well call this the Teenage Job Elimination Act. Even the liberal Congressional Budget Office recently estimated a $12 minimum would reduce the number of starter jobs by as many as 1 million. Seattle recently raised its minimum to $11 and is headed to $15. An assessment by the University of Washington finds that so far that move had the “negative unintended consequence” of fewer hours worked and fewer jobs.

2) Hike taxes. There isn’t an economic philosophy known to man that says raising taxes will help the economy. But Hillary wants to give it a try, to the tune of $1.5 trillion sucked out of the economy.e isn’t an economic philosophy known to man that says raising taxes will help the economy. But Hillary wants to give it a try, to the tune of $1.5 trillion sucked out of the economy.

Under her plan, the federal income-tax rate would rise to above 45 percent, and the death tax would go to 65 percent for the very rich. Capital-gains taxes would nearly double.

History proves raising tax rates is the least effective way for the government to raise revenue. IRS statistics indicate that most of the people who fall into the top 2 percent of income are small-business owners — and they are America’s major employers. Tax them more, and they’ll employ fewer.

In the 1980s when income-tax rates were slashed from 70 percent to 28 percent, the amount of tax revenues over the decade doubled, and the share of taxes paid by the rich increased. All you have to do is look at the high-tax states like Connecticut, Illinois and New York and you can see the jobs and people fleeing.

Our highest-in-the-world business-income-tax rate has caused companies like Burger King and Johnson Controls to head to more tax-hospitable climes. Hillary’s plan may speed up this exodus.

3) Subsidize 500 million solar panels. We tried these green-energy handouts under President Obama, and they failed. Remember Solyndra? That firm received some $500 million of taxpayer dollars and then went belly up.

The Institute for Energy Research estimates a price tag of $200 billion for these solar panels. That’s more than it cost to put a man on the moon during the Apollo project.

Let the free market pick the next great energy source, which may be clean-burning natural gas.

4) Offer free college tuition. One of the greatest financial scandals in America today is the cost that universities and colleges are charging students and their families. Some colleges now charge $60,000 a year for room, board and tuition, and the average cost is near $30,000. But if students and families aren’t paying these costs, taxpayers will have to, and costs will spike even higher.

Universities will raise tuition, as they have every time the government has provided more subsidies.

Better to require every school to freeze tuition as a condition of receiving federal aid. Purdue has done this. Why not require schools with billion-dollar-plus endowments to use some of that money to lower the tuition for families?

5) Increase Social Security benefits. Hillary wants to fatten benefits to certain senior citizens and raise the Social Security tax to “pay for it.” Really? The system is already tens of trillions of dollars in the red, according to the Social Security Administration’s actuaries. Now we are going to increase the outflow and make even bigger benefit promises? She would also apply the payroll tax of 12.4 percent on wages of up to $250,000 (up from about $110,000 today), which would be one of the biggest tax hikes of all time.

Trump would cut taxes, reduce regulation, produce more American energy, provide school vouchers for families in failing school districts and kill ObamaCare. If Wall Street thinks this agenda is worse for stocks than Hillary’s tax- spend-and-subsidize agenda, the country’s in even worse shape than I thought.

So you want free market solutions but think the government should be allowed to set rates for independent business?
Yeah real smart.
Perhaps you should look at growth during the fifties and the tax rates at the time.
Fucking moron.
By the way, a link to who wrote this id required
 
if you do the 15% and close the loopholes you actually raise their rates.
that's the way to do it.
Corporations have to make business decisions now based on tax code loopholes.
It's why they need armys of tax lawyers.

Rarely does anyone pay the actual rates -but the tax code is the driver, not the markets.
 
So you want free market solutions but think the government should be allowed to set rates for independent business?
Yeah real smart.
not "free markets" that means nothing. The choices are to raise rates or not. Raising rates really does not increase revenues.
GROWTH increases revenues, and our growth is anemic.

Perhaps you should look at growth during the fifties and the tax rates at the time.
Fucking moron.
this ain't the 50's or the 80's, we are looking at worldwide demand for goods and services flat lineing.
How do we increase our growth is the question. The Dems are even against natural gas..that is complete insanity.
we can be energy independent without ME oil, with gas, and still cut coal.
 
Opinions are nice. Moody's estimated a 10 million job gain w/ Clinton's proposals, and a 3.4 million job loss w/ Trump's.
Is that the same Moodys that gave their imprimatur to worthless sub prime derivatives and helped precipitate the financial crisis?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
So you want free market solutions but think the government should be allowed to set rates for independent business?
Yeah real smart.
Perhaps you should look at growth during the fifties and the tax rates at the time.
Fucking moron.
By the way, a link to who wrote this id required
Shut the fuck up, you foul mouthed cunt!

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
not "free markets" that means nothing. The choices are to raise rates or not. Raising rates really does not increase revenues.
GROWTH increases revenues, and our growth is anemic.

this ain't the 50's or the 80's, we are looking at worldwide demand for goods and services flat lineing.
How do we increase our growth is the question. The Dems are even against natural gas..that is complete insanity.
we can be energy independent without ME oil, with gas, and still cut coal.

Sure, it is insane if one discounts the dangers of fracking, but why start being honest now?

Why did you use the term free markets?
Is it true you didn't read your own copy-pasta?

There are laws against claiming other's work for one's own, as well as rule 5.
 
Sure, it is insane if one discounts the dangers of fracking, but why start being honest now?

Why did you use the term free markets?
Is it true you didn't read your own copy-pasta?

There are laws against claiming other's work for one's own, as well as rule 5.
improvement to fraing are happening all the time. do some reasearch.
But the main idea is we are not ready for renewables/solar to power our economy.

I don't need to agree with everything in an article. It's posted for discussion.
'Free markets" is a meaningless term.
( wellmaybe at the anemic growth we are doing)

It's a very good transitional,and it's extremely abundent, and superior to oil/coal.
 
improvement to fraing are happening all the time. do some reasearch.
But the main idea is we are not ready for renewables/solar to power our economy.

I don't need to agree with everything in an article. It's posted for discussion.
'Free markets" is a meaningless term.
( wellmaybe at the anemic growth we are doing)

It's a very good transitional,and it's extremely abundent, and superior to oil/coal.

Why did you use it if it is meaningless?
Didn't you read the article?
 
improvement to fraing are happening all the time. do some reasearch.
But the main idea is we are not ready for renewables/solar to power our economy.

I don't need to agree with everything in an article. It's posted for discussion.
'Free markets" is a meaningless term.
( wellmaybe at the anemic growth we are doing)

It's a very good transitional,and it's extremely abundent, and superior to oil/coal.

I have researched fracking in earnest.
It is inherently dangerous to purposely fracture the crust of the earth. It is you who needs to do more research.
I can show you the math involved right now if you wish.
 
if she wins, I wonder which accent she'll use after the inauguration. she loves that southern accident she pretended to have for a while. then she went back to the NY accent, then back to southern at her rally down south. most likely, she'll bust out the Hispanic accent today just to be safe.

...you left off her "black" accent; that was a barn burner. :rofl2:

 
Back
Top