Only in Alabama!

If you want to pull the wool over your own eyes and believe a delusion just like Terry, Stone and the MAGAts do about Democrats, you are free to do so, but I don't recommend it.

What wool am I pulling over my eyes?

What delusion am I believing?
 
First of all Dutch, paying taxes isn't something Conservatives did on their own to make the country an objectively better place. They are compelled to pay taxes because if they don't, they end up in jail. If given the choice, they would not pay taxes but they WOULD accept government spending if it helped them.

Secondly, I have yet to see a single Conservative push the vaccine. I have seen plenty sow doubt over the vaccine, but I have not seen any who were urging others to get it. The Conservative position is that COVID is a hoax, so the vaccine is unnecessary.

So great, we've established exactly what I said one post ago, that Conservatives don't take care of themselves OR their families. This is repeating every single stupid conversation I've ever had with you...you argue with me but then eventually, you express my position while trying to claim it's yours.
I pushed the vaccine along with masks, dear.

It's no secret I think you are mentally ill and/or autistic. You're an Abbie Normal and you clearly think Abbie Normal thoughts.
 
It's sad to lose them when you were so young. Hopefully you had plenty of family support after losing your parents.

I did have lots of support from family and friends. When something like that happens, you really find out who your friends are.
 
We're not talking about you, we're talking about Conservatives being objectively awful.

We're not talking about you, we're talking about Conservatives being objectively awful.
I'm a "conservative", dear. Not an Alt-Rightie or a Far Leftie like you, just Right-of-Center.

Again, I'm right of center which makes me a "conservative" in the eyes of all Left Wing Loonies.
 
Again, I'm right of center which makes me a "conservative" in the eyes of all Left Wing Loonies.

I've never once considered you a Conservative because you've said you're a libertarian. In fact, that's your AVI.

So if you want to say that Libertarians are Conservatives, then fine. But just know that stupidity is inherent in Conservatism.
 
You said you were a libertarian. So are you saying libertarianism = Conservatism? If so, then that's not good for you.
I'm a registered member of the LP, yes. Conservative = Right of center. Liberal = Left of center. Both have their extremist nutjobs.
 
I'm a registered member of the LP, yes. Conservative = Right of center. Liberal = Left of center. Both have their extremist nutjobs.

OK. If you want to throw your lot in with the Conservatives on JPP, I won't stop you. But it will certainly change how we interact. Because if you're calling yourself a Conservative, then I automatically will assume you're stupid.

Because Conservatism is stupid and Conservatives are stupid.

You know how I know they're stupid? Because neither have done anything on their own to make the country an objectively better place.

No policies, no bills, no laws, nothing.
 
OK. If you want to throw your lot in with the Conservatives on JPP, I won't stop you. But it will certainly change how we interact. Because if you're calling yourself a Conservative, then I automatically will assume you're stupid.

Because Conservatism is stupid and Conservatives are stupid.

You know how I know they're stupid? Because neither have done anything on their own to make the country an objectively better place.

No policies, no bills, no laws, nothing.

Another place you are wrong is your use of the term "conservatives". What's their agenda? Who are their leaders? Are they a homogenous group? IMO, you're confused and are conflating the Republican Party (no, I'm no longer a member) which has been taken over by MAGAts with "conservatism".
 
In California, the killing of an unborn ""CHILD"" (fetus) is murder and is covered under Penal Code Section 187. The California Supreme Court has ruled that knowledge of the existence of the fetus is not required to convict of murder (People v. Taylor (2004) 32 Cal. 4th 863, 868).

Text: Penal Code section 187, subdivision (a) defines murder as “the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought.”

The statute excludes lawful abortions or acts by a physician to save the life of “the mother of the fetus.” (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (b)(1) and (b)(2).) Italso expressly excludes any act that “was solicited, aided, abetted, or consented to by the mother of the fetus.” (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (b)(3).) Because persons necessarily consent to their own voluntary actions, the exclusion in subdivision (b) means that persons cannot be criminally liable for their own actions or inactions that are alleged to have caused the death of their fetus.
 
What parents wouldn't want to have the right to be legally protected if a clinic negligently destroys their embryos? Which is what happened to several couples who were denied that very protection...
 
No idea what you're trying to say here.

What about your beliefs do you think are "right of center"?
Of course not, LV. You repeatedly prove you only see what you want to see as demonstrated by this present conversation.

Individual rights, standing against "one-size-fits-all" social legislation, killing terrorists, supporting a strong national defense including abroad, supporting a strong national economy, supporting Law & Order, standing against governmental racism such as Affirmative Action...just to name a few.
 
Back
Top