One person is shot dead and five others are injured at Mudbugs food festival

View attachment 22374

Whites have evolved.. blacks are the only race still living as wild savages in 2022

There is a reason most of Africa is dangerous and its not the whites



There is a reason Jaskson Miss. South Chicago. Memphis. Detroit is dangerous and its not the whites

That is about as good an example of CRT in this country as one will find.
 
I just finished arguing on another thread that racism was prevalent in this country and that amounted to CRT. Here we have a racist shithead with a fucking stupid racist photo as his signature pointing out this was a "black" mass shooting. for every black mass shooting there are a half dozen white ones but this racist shithead brings this one up. this asshole is a good example of CRT mentality.

I can't but agree with you that CRT is racism, but I am confused with your claim there are a half dozen white mass shootings for every black one.......do you really think this is happening, and if so why does the lib'rul media not report on the white mass shootings?.....
 
No, not the Amendment, rather the insane preponderance of guns in America and the way too easy access to this insane preponderance of guns

Thanks for admitting the truth that you are a racist, cracka lib,. That the Democrat party goal is to ban law abiding Black Americans from legally owning firearms.
 
You could not display your CRT any better. I like how you made your asinine closing line bigger font. It's like you are screaming that you are a racist shithead!


View attachment 22375
Between 1982 and February 2022, 66 out of the 126 mass shootings in the United States were carried out by white shooters. By comparison, the perpetrator was African American in 21 mass shootings, and Latino in 10. When calculated as percentages, this amounts to 52 percent, 16 percent, and eight percent respectively.


Black males between 17-44 are about 3% of the population yet they commit over 50% of the murders in the U.S.

Debunk it...racist
 
You could not display your CRT any better. I like how you made your asinine closing line bigger font. It's like you are screaming that you are a racist shithead!


View attachment 22375
Between 1982 and February 2022, 66 out of the 126 mass shootings in the United States were carried out by white shooters. By comparison, the perpetrator was African American in 21 mass shootings, and Latino in 10. When calculated as percentages, this amounts to 52 percent, 16 percent, and eight percent respectively.

Mass Shootings Are Soaring, With Black Neighborhoods Hit Hardest

The mass shootings have disproportionately occurred in predominantly Black neighborhoods. Nearly 50 percent of the shootings analyzed by The Trace took place in majority-Black census tracts, though less than 10 percent of census tracts nationally have majority Black populations. The pattern held in almost every city that has had more than five mass shootings in 2020. In Chicago, for example, 31 out of 36 shootings with four or more victims happened in majority-Black census tracts. In Detroit and Milwaukee, each of which saw five mass shootings, all of them occurred in majority-Black neighborhoods.


mass-shootings-cities-768x811.jpg

https://www.thetrace.org/2020/09/mass-shootings-2020-gun-violence-black-neighborhoods/
 
You could not display your CRT any better. I like how you made your asinine closing line bigger font. It's like you are screaming that you are a racist shithead!


View attachment 22375
Between 1982 and February 2022, 66 out of the 126 mass shootings in the United States were carried out by white shooters. By comparison, the perpetrator was African American in 21 mass shootings, and Latino in 10. When calculated as percentages, this amounts to 52 percent, 16 percent, and eight percent respectively.
Mass Shooters Aren’t Disproportionately White

Where the myth came from, and what it gets right and wrong about the demographics of mass killings.



The myth began to spread in July 2012 after a 24-year-old white man, James Holmes, murdered 12 people in an Aurora, Colorado, movie theater. That summer, a team of researchers at Mother Jones put together a database of rampages in public settings. Among the 62 cases (and 64 total perpetrators) the team reviewed—instances dating back to 1982, in which at least four people had been killed in a public place—44 of the killers were white men and one was a white woman. In total, about 70 percent of the perpetrators in the database were white.






Overall murder rates among black Americans are 6.3 times higher than they are for whites, according to a report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Another report suggests white offenders made up just 45.3 percent of everyone who committed homicides between 1980 and 2008.* In other words, white Americans may be somewhat underrepresented among mass shooters, but they’re even more underrepresented among all killers.




https://slate.com/news-and-politics...ght-and-wrong-about-killers-demographics.html



Overall, we rate Slate, moderately Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that favor the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a reasonable fact check record.

Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/slate/
 
Last edited:
Niggers gotta nig.

You're only fucking yourself, Jack, right into a perm ban. Man up and take your penalty then return. PM me for lots of other forums you can harass in the interim.

5t74p5.jpg
 
There ya go, show your CRT! and posters were arguing in another thread that CRT wasn't prevalent in this country.

That isn't CRT in any way, shape, or form. It is an observation based on the pictures of the incident presented. Facts are facts, like them or not.
 
That isn't CRT in any way, shape, or form. It is an observation based on the pictures of the incident presented. Facts are facts, like them or not.

Black males between 17-44 are about 3% of the population yet they commit over 50% of the murders in the U.S.

The POS also thinks that FACT is CRT
 
Black males between 17-44 are about 3% of the population yet they commit over 50% of the murders in the U.S.

The POS also thinks that FACT is CRT

No doubt you masturbate to charts showing they are mostly killing other young black males. Sad.

The #1 killer of black males 1-44 is homicide. For white males it's accidents. Pretty fucking sad that America can't better. Personally, I blame the racist assholes, especially the Pedo Nazis, but I could be wrong.

https://www.cdc.gov/healthequity/lcod/men/2017/nonhispanic-black/index.htm <--- death porn for racist incels.

https://www.cdc.gov/healthequity/lcod/men/2017/nonhispanic-white/index.htm
 
Thanks for admitting the truth that you are a racist, cracka lib,. That the Democrat party goal is to ban law abiding Black Americans from legally owning firearms.

Whew, now that one is funny, how does one get "the Democrat party goal is to ban law abiding Black Americans from legally owning firearms" from the comment "No, not the Amendment, rather the insane preponderance of guns in America and the way too easy access to this insane preponderance of guns?"

Beautiful
 
Do you? Please explain it to me because all I see is RW bullshit and unsubstantiated accusations.

CRT is derived from Critical Pedagogy through Derrick Bell's Critical Legal Theory. It was invented by the Marxist Communist Kimberley Crenshaw using those as its basis. CRT was combined by her theories on Intersectionality.

In a nutshell, CRT is warmed over neo-Marxism. Under CRT, racism is endemic to particular groups and races based on their economic status and assumed privilege within society. This race replaces economics as a class structure. So, Whites are oppressors and racists by simple virtue of their economic status and assumed privilege. Being White--in and of itself--makes you a racist even if you individually are not. At the same time, being in a minority group assigned less status like being Black makes you the oppressed target of racism and hence, you cannot be racist even if by your actions and words are clearly so.

Individuality plays no role in CRT. It is the group collective you are put in that matters. It's no different than being in the proletariat and working class versus the bourgeoisie and monied class. Warmed over Marx.

So, in application, CRT would seek to identify each person's status and class, assign to them a role of oppressor or oppressed, and then proceed to indoctrinate them on that basis. You're White? You must acknowledge your racism and atone for your sins. Black? You are oppressed and you need to rise up against your oppressors. Again, classic Marx.

That in a nutshell is what CRT is. Critical Pedagogy, the original basis is no different. It started with Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed where the argument is made that education should be indoctrination into groupthink and being good revolutionaries of the radical Left among the oppressed (peasants, workers, and dispossessed of society). This was glommed onto by radical Leftist Marxists and turned into a theory of how education should proceed.

Bell's Critical Legal Theory derives from that that there are groups that are oppressed and benefit from the way laws are structured. Same thing, different setting.
 
CRT is derived from Critical Pedagogy through Derrick Bell's Critical Legal Theory. It was invented by the Marxist Communist Kimberley Crenshaw using those as its basis. CRT was combined by her theories on Intersectionality.

In a nutshell, CRT is warmed over neo-Marxism. Under CRT, racism is endemic to particular groups and races based on their economic status and assumed privilege within society. This race replaces economics as a class structure. So, Whites are oppressors and racists by simple virtue of their economic status and assumed privilege. Being White--in and of itself--makes you a racist even if you individually are not. At the same time, being in a minority group assigned less status like being Black makes you the oppressed target of racism and hence, you cannot be racist even if by your actions and words are clearly so.

Individuality plays no role in CRT. It is the group collective you are put in that matters. It's no different than being in the proletariat and working class versus the bourgeoisie and monied class. Warmed over Marx.

So, in application, CRT would seek to identify each person's status and class, assign to them a role of oppressor or oppressed, and then proceed to indoctrinate them on that basis. You're White? You must acknowledge your racism and atone for your sins. Black? You are oppressed and you need to rise up against your oppressors. Again, classic Marx.

That in a nutshell is what CRT is. Critical Pedagogy, the original basis is no different. It started with Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed where the argument is made that education should be indoctrination into groupthink and being good revolutionaries of the radical Left among the oppressed (peasants, workers, and dispossessed of society). This was glommed onto by radical Leftist Marxists and turned into a theory of how education should proceed.

Bell's Critical Legal Theory derives from that that there are groups that are oppressed and benefit from the way laws are structured. Same thing, different setting.

That reads like a classic Heritage or Cato Foundation explanation on what CRT is suppose to be, regardless, tell us now how this understanding of CRT is taught to elementary or even high schools kids in every school in America. Just trying to teach Marxism would be a tough enough task to a high level high school class, but now you got a whole race scenario conspiracy added to the mix
 
CRT is derived from Critical Pedagogy through Derrick Bell's Critical Legal Theory. It was invented by the Marxist Communist Kimberley Crenshaw using those as its basis. CRT was combined by her theories on Intersectionality.

In a nutshell, CRT is warmed over neo-Marxism. Under CRT, racism is endemic to particular groups and races based on their economic status and assumed privilege within society. This race replaces economics as a class structure. So, Whites are oppressors and racists by simple virtue of their economic status and assumed privilege. Being White--in and of itself--makes you a racist even if you individually are not. At the same time, being in a minority group assigned less status like being Black makes you the oppressed target of racism and hence, you cannot be racist even if by your actions and words are clearly so.

Individuality plays no role in CRT. It is the group collective you are put in that matters. It's no different than being in the proletariat and working class versus the bourgeoisie and monied class. Warmed over Marx.

So, in application, CRT would seek to identify each person's status and class, assign to them a role of oppressor or oppressed, and then proceed to indoctrinate them on that basis. You're White? You must acknowledge your racism and atone for your sins. Black? You are oppressed and you need to rise up against your oppressors. Again, classic Marx.

That in a nutshell is what CRT is. Critical Pedagogy, the original basis is no different. It started with Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed where the argument is made that education should be indoctrination into groupthink and being good revolutionaries of the radical Left among the oppressed (peasants, workers, and dispossessed of society). This was glommed onto by radical Leftist Marxists and turned into a theory of how education should proceed.

Bell's Critical Legal Theory derives from that that there are groups that are oppressed and benefit from the way laws are structured. Same thing, different setting.

Nice spin. :) You're the only one I've seen spinning the marxist angle. Most are spinning the "blame whitey" angle.
 
Back
Top