Once you eliminate the impossible...

The Ugly Truth said:
I believe in a Creator.
Click to expand...

Yeah...you blindly guess there is a "Creator"...and you like to call that blind guess a "belief."

We agree on that.



There is plenty of evidence for one.
Click to expand...

There may be evidence for one...but there may be none. If a "creator" exists...everything is evidence of it. If a "creator" does not exists...nothing is evidence of it.

We do not know if one exists or not.


I could be wrong, but I doubt it.
Click to expand...

You could be wrong...you could be correct. And you are stubborn so you are going to doubt that you can be wrong.


There had to be an uncaused cause for everything.
Click to expand...

You screwed up again...and this time I am going to insist on your sticking with this.

If there is a "creator"...what is its uncaused cause?

Without one, you have an infinite regression of causes. Which is scientifically impossible. Don't even try to tell me it isn't.
Click to expand...

You are a lost case. You pretend to be scientific and logical...and you are neither. You assert stuff that cannot be established.

But I am going to be right here dealing with your nonsense.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Nothing funnier than when stupid people attempt to look learned.

Great example in this quoted post.
Click to expand...

More "SCIENTIFIC" ad hominem Bullshit? And you prove you are working with SCIENCE....via the application of personal ad hominem insults? Really? :laugh: This simply proves you have no way of refuting that which was presented. It has always indicated the sound of the final buzzer.....all smart ass people, in the end......refer to the ad hominem insult, it means GAME OVER.. ;)

Why did you not refute this "FUNNY" post? Its simple......it was TRUTH, there is no refutation of such....thus, the anger generated INSULT. You have nothing else.
 
The Ugly Truth said:
Both Latin and Greek contain words based on the root words of the other language. Atheo is Latin. Atheos is based on the Latin root word. What else have you got?
Click to expand...

I have given you two sources for the etymology of the words "atheist" and "atheism." Both derive from the Greek through the French.

So far you have not given me any sources whatever.

So why not try to give a source that says "atheist" derives from the Latin.

C'mon...at least give it a try. And when you find that you cannot...come back an acknowledge that you couldn't.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Yeah...you blindly guess there is a "Creator"...and you like to call that blind guess a "belief."

We agree on that.





There may be evidence for one...but there may be none. If a "creator" exists...everything is evidence of it. If a "creator" does not exists...nothing is evidence of it.

We do not know if one exists or not.




You could be wrong...you could be correct. And you are stubborn so you are going to doubt that you can be wrong.




You screwed up again...and this time I am going to insist on your sticking with this.

If there is a "creator"...what is its uncaused cause?



You are a lost case. You pretend to be scientific and logical...and you are neither. You assert stuff that cannot be established.

But I am going to be right here dealing with your nonsense.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that an infinite regression is not impossible? You'll have to prove that.
 
The Ugly Truth said:
Nothing funnier than a stupid person calling their betters stupid. Great example in this quoted post.
Click to expand...

Yes, I suspect you consider yourself to be my "better."

I'm in good company. You think yourself to be "better" than Einstein, Feynman, and Hawking.

You are a joke, Ugly.
 
Ralph said:
More "SCIENTIFIC" ad hominem Bullshit? And you prove you are working with SCIENCE....via the application of personal ad hominem insults? Really? :laugh: This simply proves you have no way of refuting that which was presented. It has always indicated the sound of the final buzzer.....all smart ass people, in the end......refer to the ad hominem insult, it means GAME OVER.. ;)
Click to expand...

Laugh all you want, Ralph...

...but I did disprove what was presented.

I gave two sources.
 
The Ugly Truth said:
Are you saying that an infinite regression is not impossible? You'll have to prove that.
Click to expand...

Ugly...if you do not understand how things work...perhaps discussions of this sort are not for you.

YOU do not get to make an assertion...and then demand that I prove it is wrong.

If you want to take on the task of proving any of your assertions...be my guest.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Laugh all you want, Ralph...

...but I did disprove what was presented.

I gave two sources.
Click to expand...

You have scientific evidence derived via the scientific method of Reproducible, Observed, Constantly derived experimentation that. 1. The universe came from NOTHING? Left us see your Science that does not include such terms as Looks Like, Suggests, Could have, might have.....and the entire list of subjective BS terms. 2 That Life can come from dead matter 3. That dead matter life then evolved in a vertical fashion (changing species time and time again....first being asexual life that requires 1 sex and then changing into life that requires 2 sexs genders to procreate?

Lets see your Applied Science. ;)
 
Frank Apisa said:
Ugly...if you do not understand how things work...perhaps discussions of this sort are not for you.

YOU do not get to make an assertion...and then demand that I prove it is wrong.

If you want to take on the task of proving any of your assertions...be my guest.
Click to expand...

That's what your fellow NLs Zappa, Nomad, domer, evince, Cypress, archives, and Bourbon do. When are you going to address them?
 
Ralph said:
You have scientific evidence derived via the scientific method of Reproducible, Observed, Constantly derived experimentation that. 1. The universe came from NOTHING? Left see your Science that does not include such terms as Looks Like, Suggests, Could have, might have.....and the entire list of subjective BS terms. 2 That Life can come from dead matter 3. That dead matter life then evolved in a vertical fashion (changing species time and time again....first being asexual life that requires 1 sex and then changing into life that requires 2 sexs genders to procreate?
Click to expand...

What the hell are you talking about?

Are you just rambling?
 
Frank Apisa said:
I have given you two sources for the etymology of the words "atheist" and "atheism." Both derive from the Greek through the French.

So far you have not given me any sources whatever.

So why not try to give a source that says "atheist" derives from the Latin.

C'mon...at least give it a try. And when you find that you cannot...come back an acknowledge that you couldn't.
Click to expand...

Here ya go. http://www.wordsense.eu/atheo/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top