Omg, imagine if Trump tried this

dukkha said:
there obviously is. when you show symptoms you are past an early infection.
early infections by definition are low loads

and what ever happened to THERAPEUTICS??? I see NO MENTION of these by anyone.
By now we should have an off the shelf protocol available thru your local pharmacy as soon as you test positive

many inhibit viral loading to prevent the cytokine storm
Click to expand...
wrong. vaxxed people can have the same viral load and be asymptomatic.

if the virus is even real.

vaxx creates superspreader according to their own combined propaganda.

this is the tangled web woven when one lies all the time, not you, but the systemic establishment status quo of radicalized regular new normalcy.
 
Darth Omar said:
You just read the link. Biden officials were whining about how CNN was covering the CCP bug. They wouldn’t communicate their displeasure to CNN, would they lol? Please don’t tell me you’ve developed a sudden aversion to anonymous sources after the last four years.
Click to expand...

One author with one unknown source.

I have no problem trusting the source if it is checked to be reliable.

The claim is that "Biden White House" "told" CNN to "calm down" on being an alarmist. I do not see any official word from "Biden White House" nor from ANY of the officials.

And why would they not communicate their displeasure with any news network?

And have you seen those chyrons in question? I haven't either.
 
Micawber said:
MS news media is the most accurate media there is, excluding Fox. Full stop.
Anyone who disagrees is a certified Trump cock sucking brain dead fool.
Click to expand...

NEWS & POLITICS
Judge Rules Rachel Maddow's Show Isn't News
BY MATT MARGOLIS JUN 22, 2021 5:33 PM ET


AP Photo/Steven Senne
I’ve never actually watched a full episode of Rachel Maddow’s show on MSNBC, but based on the clips I’ve seen, there’s no doubt that it is left-wing propaganda, not news.


And a federal judge apparently agrees with that.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald reports that an Obama-appointed judge ruled last month that “Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news.”

Maddow does not keep her political views a secret, and therefore, audiences could expect her to use subjective language that comports with her political opinions.

Thus, Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news. The point of Maddow’s show is for her to provide the news but also to offer her opinions as to that news.

While it’s amusing that we can now say a federal judge has ruled that Rachel Maddow’s show isn’t news, the ruling is actually not as amusing as you would think. The ruling was over a 2019 lawsuit from One America News (OAN), which sued Maddow, MSNBC, and its parent corporation, Comcast Corp., for defamation after Maddow claimed on the air, without evidence, that OAN, which she described as “the most obsequiously pro-Trump right-wing news outlet in America,” is “really literally…paid Russian propaganda.” Maddow was reporting on a Daily Beast article that noted an OAN reporter was a “Russian national” who also wrote freelance for the Russian-owned publication Sputnik.

The Obama-appointed judge Cynthia Bashant dismissed the defamation lawsuit on the grounds that Maddow’s audience knows she’s hyperpartisan, and thus, as Greenwald put it, that her audience “understands that her show consists of exaggeration, hyperbole, and pure opinion, and therefore would not assume that such outlandish accusations are factually true even when she uses the language of certainty and truth when presenting them (‘literally is paid Russian propaganda’).”


Recommended: Hunter Biden’s Art Exhibit Is So Fishy, Even OBAMA’s Ethics Chief Can’t Keep Silent

Bashant also ruled that Maddow’s viewers “expect” this of Maddow and watch her show “with the understanding that it will contain Maddow’s ‘personal and subjective views’ about the news.”

Here, Maddow had inserted her own colorful commentary into and throughout the segment, laughing, expressing her dismay (i.e., saying “I mean, what?”) and calling the segment a “sparkly story” and one we must “take in stride.” For her to exaggerate the facts and call OAN Russian propaganda was consistent with her tone up to that point, and the Court finds a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual given this context. The context of Maddow’s statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be her opinion. A reasonable viewer would not actually think OAN is paid Russian propaganda, instead, he or she would follow the facts of the Daily Beast article; that OAN and Sputnik share a reporter and both pay this reporter to write articles. Anything beyond this is Maddow’s opinion or her exaggeration of the facts.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...-rules-rachel-maddows-show-isnt-news-n1456306
 
dukkha said:
its the media.
people are uniformed because they use social media or MS media for their newz
Click to expand...

The irony is a big part of the problem with a major segment of the hesitancy crowd is *they are informed*. How can anyone blame a healthy childless young woman for being apprehensive about taking an experimental injection knowing there’s even a scant possibility she might regret it down the road. Maybe she understands the statistics and doesn’t need some busybodies to ‘help her’ with her own risk/benefit analysis.

I’ve seen hesitancy numbers as high as 40% amongst healthcare workers. Lots of healthy *well educated* young woman in healthcare. Do people think such individuals are going to be ‘educated’ by some idiotic chyron running on CNN or FB posts?
 
AProudLefty said:
One author with one unknown source.

I have no problem trusting the source if it is checked to be reliable.

The claim is that "Biden White House" "told" CNN to "calm down" on being an alarmist. I do not see any official word from "Biden White House" nor from ANY of the officials.

And why would they not communicate their displeasure with any news network?

And have you seen those chyrons in question? I haven't either.
Click to expand...

do you consider Biden's criticism of cnn to be an attack against the first amendment, like it was when trump called fake news?
 
Diesel said:
I'm not trying to force anyone to do anything. I simply am discerning about whom I associate. You people do not belong in a civilized society. Full stop.
Click to expand...

who is 'you people'? non leftists? non statists? because, apparently, you're still making the same stupid assumptions all your idiot liberal friends are doing
 
Micawber said:
Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou
in case you need a reminder, it's YOU trying to force people to do something YOU want them to do........that's called fascism

Deisel's post is better than this technicality, but add to it that that is NOT a definition of fascism. If it were, every law that mandated anything
would be fascism to anyone opposed to doing it, you fucking MORON. Some people might not want to get a drivers license, or serve in time of conscription,
or put clothes on before going to an elementary school.


You fucking IDIOT. No wonder this country is in this state. These people are fucking incompetent.
And he calls himself "smarter than?" LMFAO
Click to expand...

hey, dumbfuck, it doesn't MATTER if you WANT to do something, it's still fucking fascism. It's extremely pathetic how you downplay shit, just like trump.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
who is 'you people'? non leftists? non statists? because, apparently, you're still making the same stupid assumptions all your idiot liberal friends are doing
Click to expand...

You're the one who said this, dumbass.

SmarterthanYou said:
in case you need a reminder, it's YOU trying to force people to do something YOU want them to do........that's called fascism
Click to expand...

You made a retarded assumption about him.
 
Micawber said:
Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou
in case you need a reminder, it's YOU trying to force people to do something YOU want them to do........that's called fascism

Deisel's post is better than this technicality, but add to it that that is NOT a definition of fascism. If it were, every law that mandated anything
would be fascism to anyone opposed to doing it, you fucking MORON. Some people might not want to get a drivers license, or serve in time of conscription,
or put clothes on before going to an elementary school.


You fucking IDIOT. No wonder this country is in this state. These people are fucking incompetent.
And he calls himself "smarter than?" LMFAO
Click to expand...

This is the country we deserve. We let people like Smarter Than breed and vote. These motherfuckers wear Velcro shoes and watch OANN. What did we think was going to happen?

I'm tired. I'm tired of trying to correct our path and educate simpletons like Smarter Than. It's no longer just a matter of political disagreement. These people are dangerous. They are dangerous to themselves and are actively trying to kill their fellow citizens. They need to be removed from our society immediately.
 
AProudLefty said:
What the actual fuck?
Click to expand...

Cultists like Smarter Than wouldn't know what's true if it smacked him across his toothless dumbass mouth. These people have never gained an education. They think that fascism is communism. In Smarter Than's case, he thinks that waiting in line at the deli because someone else got there before he did is fascism.

Grade A stone cold fucking moron. Welcome to America.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top