The economy wasn't brought to a halt by a virus.
The economy was severely damaged by politically-motivated pandemic panic propaganda promulgated by pernicious progressives pursuing power.
Ok those on the left here is your chance.
- Thread starter Eagle_Eye
- Start date
The economy wasn't brought to a halt by a virus.
The economy was severely damaged by politically-motivated pandemic panic propaganda promulgated by pernicious progressives pursuing power.
Thanks for admitting it.
Capitalism is a water wheel dependent on human activity to fuel its turn. With activity shut down, it slows and stalls. The Social Democracies of Europe have stuff in place to give the people the ability to fuel the nation when such things happen. We turned into a half-assed version of them with the stimulus to try and keep that wheel from stalling and probably spent more than if we just had something in place from the getgo.
Admitting what? That I learned math in first grade and you didn't? Okay, guilty. I learned to multiply. Does that make me a nerd? ROTFLMFAO!!! This might be one of the stupidest conversations I've ever had on a message board, and that's saying something. Real easy for you. If the rate of infection is less than 1:1, the number of new cases will drop. True or False?
So you can't answer a simple math question? Seriously, take a remedial class and get back to me.
No. I can't make up a mathematical rule. It is fact. So, is that question too challenging for you? Let's try again, okay? If the infection rate is less than 1:1, cases will drop. True or False? LOL at you. You can't answer a basic math question. How sad.
Really?
Yes, really. Are you another one that needs a first grade math refresher?
I've been a machinist for 40 years, you tell me.
If it's a fact, how come you can't cite a verifiable source for your claim?
Are you serious? You want to see a math chart? ROTFLFMAO!!!! Wow.
If the infection rate is less than 1:1, cases will drop. True or False? Come on, you can do it. There are only two choices. Even if you are too stupid to figure it out, you have a 50/50 chance of getting the right answer.
I don't think that means you can do math. If the infection rate is less than 1:1, cases will drop. This is a mathematical certainty.
What's obvious is that you can't do math.
Man, you are desperate.
The source you cited in your desperation says "Importantly, a disease’s R0 value only applies when everyone in a population is completely vulnerable to the disease. This means:
no one has been vaccinated
no one has had the disease before
there’s no way to control the spread of the disease"
Your source is also not peer-reviewed, as far as I can see. It makes assumptions unsupported by verifiable scientific evidence.
The lone study cited admits that the authors "collected an expanded set of case reports across China on the basis of publicly available information, estimated key epidemiologic parameters, and provided a new estimate of the early epidemic growth rate and R0 in Wuhan".
You fail.
I made a comfortable living as a machinist, doing math was the simple part of it. And you?
(here's where we hear the "Master's in Mechanical Engineering" shit LOL!)