OK, seriously considering voting for Gary

evince said:
the Austrian school is ajoke
Click to expand...

Again, you don't understand your comments. The war you are attempting to fight is with Mises' praxeology and Rothbard's followers who turned it into an axiom. Many who call temselves anarcho capitalists (not necessarily libertarian) reject it.

Hayek, who can be included in the Austrian school, strongly disagreed with it.

It's not unlike an argument from the right that pretends that all of those who are left of center agree absolutely with everything you say. Rational and objective people know that most of those on the left think you are completely bonkers and they just sort of tolerate you.
 
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bios/Mises.html



Mises believed that economic truths are derived from self-evident axioms and cannot be empirically tested. He laid out his view in his magnum opus, Human Action, and in other publications, although he failed to persuade many economists outside the Austrian school. Mises was also a strong proponent of laissez-faire; he advocated that the government not intervene anywhere in the economy. Interestingly, though, even Mises made some striking exceptions to this view. For example, he believed that military conscription could be justified in wartime
 
184570_600.jpg


cjones10022016.jpg

A vote for Gary Johnson is a vote for Trump!
 
evince said:
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bios/Mises.html



Mises believed that economic truths are derived from self-evident axioms and cannot be empirically tested. He laid out his view in his magnum opus, Human Action, and in other publications, although he failed to persuade many economists outside the Austrian school. Mises was also a strong proponent of laissez-faire; he advocated that the government not intervene anywhere in the economy. Interestingly, though, even Mises made some striking exceptions to this view. For example, he believed that military conscription could be justified in wartime
Click to expand...

liertarianism
 
Dick from the Internet said:
He supported war with Iraq and our involvement in Libya. I think he would be very likely to start a war due to little more than an insult. His foreign policy is incoherent except on trade where it is just idiotic.

What's wrong with Gary's foreign policy?

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/gary-johnson-my-foreign-policy-vision-17974
Click to expand...
no he didn't "support the war" -jesus you might as well be posting Clintonista crap.
He offhandedly said "ya I guess so" to Howard Stern,but within 4 months of the war ( before it got bogged down) -he was against it -
in a much more forthright manner.

As to Libya he supported "surgical strikes" ( which were in vogue back then) -not some Smart Power interventionism
or sending arms to the Libyan rebels like Clinton did.

Recall Clinton had much more info access,and fucked up every decision she ever made -and to this day still calls Libya
a "success for democracy" or some similar crap-speak
 
Football Jersey said:
I like Gary. I voted for him last time, because it was a safe vote, and I helped add to his margin. Frankly, he deserves your vote way more than the Douchebag and the Crook, anyway.
Click to expand...
Maybe you can get him a map showing where Aleppo is, can't hurt?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
anatta said:
no he didn't "support the war" -jesus you might as well be posting Clintonista crap.
He offhandedly said "ya I guess so" to Howard Stern,but withing 4 months of the war ( before it got bogged down) -he was against it -
in a much forthright manner.

As to Libya he supported "surgical strikes" ( which were in vogue back then) -not some Smart Power interventionism
or sending arms to the Libyan rebels like Clinton did.

Recall Clinton had much more info access,and fucked up every decision she ever made -and to this day still calls Libya
a "success for democracy" or some similar crap-speak
Click to expand...

just keep stabbing
 
evince said:
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/AustrianSchoolofEconomics.html



The historical school, on the other hand, had argued that economic science is incapable of generating universal principles and that scientific research should instead be focused on detailed historical examination.
Click to expand...


The text you quote is about "the historical school," IOW, the Austrian schools opponents. You don't have the wherewithal to even understand your own sources.

I had to explain to you what "school" meant in this context. It's like explaining evolution to PiMPle, yet somehow more pointless.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top