OK, public service announcement for right wing fuckin morons

Gonzomin said:
That makes no sense. there is not one Russian in the equation. Steele was checking Trump's connections with Russian oligarchs and was shocked at what he found. He notified the FBI. There was no benefit for Russia. When Putin helped Trump win the presidency, he was doing it because it was a gain for Russia and Putin.
Click to expand...

and besides Fusion GPS is an AMERICAN company, not a foreign entity. Hillary's PAC did absolutely nothing illegal

the wingers will be dragging this meme around til they die, hopefully sooner than later
 
countryboy said:
Soooo, as long as you pay for Russian disinformation to effect the outcome of an election it's okay. Got it. My bad.
Click to expand...

After dozens of me quoting the law and only NOW you’re beginning to get it?

What a fucking moron. :rofl2:

One more time for good measure, illiterate dumbfuck.

“While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2...t-from-foreign-governments-in-the-2020/223924
 
So, her campaign paid somebody to hire a foreign national to gather information on a political opponent from unsavory governments. Thank you for the "lesson".
 
Damocles said:
So, her campaign paid somebody to hire a foreign national to gather information on a political opponent from unsavory governments. Thank you for the "lesson".
Click to expand...

NOW, you get that part of the equation. Try to figure out the law, dumbfuck.

“While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2...t-from-foreign-governments-in-the-2020/223924
 
domer76 said:
After dozens of me quoting the law and only NOW you’re beginning to get it?

What a fucking moron. :rofl2:

One more time for good measure, illiterate dumbfuck.

“While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2...t-from-foreign-governments-in-the-2020/223924
Click to expand...

Fair market value?

Was it legal to use a legal firm as a cutout and call it "legal services" so nobody knew what you were doing? Why did the Clinton campaign deny they paid for it if there was nothing wrong with what they did. I love watching you twist yourself in knots defending Crooked Hillary for shit you are trying to impeach President Trump for

Let's review

Pay russians for dirt to impact an election is good
Get free dirt from russians to impact an election is bad

Is that about right?

TICK TOCK

Barr is coming
 
Let me see if I got this right lol.

Trump tells Stephanopoulos that he’d consider taking oppo research from Norway and the media hacks get breathless with hysteria.

But by the end of the week the lefties are circling the wagons around Fusion GPS?
 
domer76 said:
NOW, you get that part of the equation. Try to figure out the law, dumbfuck.

“While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2...t-from-foreign-governments-in-the-2020/223924
Click to expand...


Damo is several.orders of magnitude brighter than this obnoxious cunt, he ought be prostrating himself at his feet!!
 
Teflon Don said:
Pay russians for dirt to impact an election is good
Get free dirt from russians to impact an election is bad
Click to expand...

Lets make it even clearer.....
pay Russians to prepare false dirt to impact an election and use it to surveil your opponent is good.....
to be offered dirt from Russians which turns out to be nothing is bad.......
 
domer76 said:
After dozens of me quoting the law and only NOW you’re beginning to get it?

What a fucking moron. :rofl2:

One more time for good measure, illiterate dumbfuck.

“While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2...t-from-foreign-governments-in-the-2020/223924
Click to expand...

perfect. So to be clear. The only difference between what Trump was saying of accepting dirt from foreign governments and what hillary did is that she paid for it? So if Trump were to pay said foreign goverments everything would be good?
 
Teflon Don said:
Fair market value?

Was it legal to use a legal firm as a cutout and call it "legal services" so nobody knew what you were doing? Why did the Clinton campaign deny they paid for it if there was nothing wrong with what they did. I love watching you twist yourself in knots defending Crooked Hillary for shit you are trying to impeach President Trump for

Let's review

Pay russians for dirt to impact an election is good
Get free dirt from russians to impact an election is bad

Is that about right?

TICK TOCK

Barr is coming
Click to expand...

Now you’re finally beginning to get it. How many times did I have to provide that quote before you got it? Dozens?

Dense cocksucker. :rofl2:
 
tsuke said:
perfect. So to be clear. The only difference between what Trump was saying of accepting dirt from foreign governments and what hillary did is that she paid for it? So if Trump were to pay said foreign goverments everything would be good?
Click to expand...

Another dense cocksucker.

It would be legal if Trump would have contracted with someone.

Can you idiots comprehend simple English?
 
Darth Omar said:
Let me see if I got this right lol.

Trump tells Stephanopoulos that he’d consider taking oppo research from Norway and the media hacks get breathless with hysteria.

But by the end of the week the lefties are circling the wagons around Fusion GPS?
Click to expand...

“While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2...t-from-foreign-governments-in-the-2020/223924
 
Teflon Don said:
I never capitulate. The fact that you guys are trying to defend Fusion GPS shows how scared you are.

TICK TOCK

Barr is coming
Click to expand...

Barr is coming in your mouth.

“While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2...t-from-foreign-governments-in-the-2020/223924
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Lets make it even clearer.....
pay Russians to prepare false dirt to impact an election and use it to surveil your opponent is good.....
to be offered dirt from Russians which turns out to be nothing is bad.......
Click to expand...

“While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2...t-from-foreign-governments-in-the-2020/223924
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top