Ok, now that I've heard both, I believe Kavanaugh is telling the truth.

With all due respect, you've got all the details you need to make a sound judgement. He acts as though he's guilty. I don't think there is anything he could have said BECAUSE HE'S A LIAR.

Whatever bias anyone may have, that has nothing to do with the fact that he should have demanded an investigation, he should have taken a polygraph, he should have answered truthfully and straight-forwardly to the questions he was asked .. including whether he would ask for the FBI to investigate.

You are free to believe whatever you choose to believe, but demanding more proof/evidence of others then you are willing to provide simply makes no sense.

How do you make the bolded statement when you yourself don't have any proof .. none .. and you don't even seem to believe in common sense.

Your suggestion that I have something in common with Trump when you're giving faith-based answers is just monumentally silly .. and it makes you the tool that many have discovered that you are.

Democrat senator "What is your name"

Answer: "What!!! This is a disgrace, this is a conspiracy, a travesty, I like beer, don't you black out!!!!"

Republican senator "Why are you so awesome?"

Ans "Well, it all started with my varsity basketball letter, straight A's prudence and church"
 
I don't need proof to prove he's innocent. :whoa:

Dude, you're a tool.

Feel free to claim yourself holy and pure .. but you should just join the Trump team where you'll be right at home making stupid ass statements like the bolded.
lol...he looked angry..he must have been drinking..he's a drunk,.,,so he's a rapist.. ROFL

look up presumption of innocence..it's does not assume one is a rapist because Ford said so
 
Democrat senator "What is your name"

Answer: "What!!! This is a disgrace, this is a conspiracy, a travesty, I like beer, don't you black out!!!!"

Republican senator "Why are you so awesome?"

Ans "Well, it all started with my varsity basketball letter, straight A's prudence and church"

It was just incredible listening to this guy run from simple questions. Not only should he not be on the Supreme Court, he shouldn't even have to job he has.

"I like beer .. do you like beer?"
 
Everything about his crazed behavior bespoke of his guilt. Everything. You would be hard pressed to find the comedian
who can lampoon it. Chris Farley? His crazed demeanor and combativeness and facial tics and blubbering and resisting straightforward questions
was so far off the reservation it was self parody. I was worried he might go on a raving rampage and start choking people.
He was a basketcase.

I don't see it that way. If someone accused you of molesting children, wouldn't that upset you and make you crazy? I know it would me.
How would you like it if you were in a courtroom and someone kept asking you, "Have you ever put your hands on a child's genitals?", "Have you ever pressed your crotch against a child's body?", "Have you ever grabbed a child inappropriately in a sexual manner?".

You really think you could answer those questions and more without getting agitated and emotional? I doubt it. Being accused of that is unsettling. Being accused of that and having to answer those questions in front of a Senate hearing and on national TV is unsettling and traumatic. I doubt you could sit there and calmly answer those questions with zero emotion.

He was acting just like I would expect an innocent person to act and as you know, I'm no fan of Trump. In fact, I loathe, despise and abhor the guy. I hope he gets impeached, convicted and kicked out of office. My opinion of Kavanaugh has nothing to do with how I feel about Trump. And it shouldn't.
Can you honestly say the same thing?
 
lol...he looked angry..he must have been drinking..he's a drunk,.,,so he's a rapist.. ROFL

look up presumption of innocence..it's does not assume one is a rapist because Ford said so

I know .. you don't need any stinkin' proof eithert. Got it.

The problem is that what you don't need is meaningless and we're on to the FBI investigation that those of us who need something more concrete then your emotions.
 
Speaking of being a tool, have you ever heard the term "Innocent until proven guilty"? It's what our whole legal system is based on.
It means EVERYONE starts out as INNOCENT and has to be PROVEN GUILTY with FACTS and EVIDENCE. You don't need evidence to prove him innocent.
Comprende? Kapish?
You don't seem to understand that. It's pretty damn simple.
So, I guess that would make YOU the tool.

I'm sure have heard this many times, but this isn't a criminal court. They were testing fitness for this job, supposedly.
The refusal to provide answers teetered on citable contempt. In fact he outwardly displayed actual contempt with his
accusations when all anyone on the left was doing was trying to get him to just answer relevant questions. In response
he deflected, altered the questions, went off on tangents and filibustered, all calculated to not provide relevant information.
That's what a person who is prevaricating does.

Now, in civil court, the standard is a preponderance of evidence. IMO her evidence on the fact of assault
preponderated over his self serving denial. She was more credible, calm, and as stated above showed
the opposite indicia of honesty. She answered every single question straightforwardly and without any resistance
or reframing, save one, and that one was because the question was not very intelligible.

Due respect given.

PS there is a cool chart measuring their responsiveness, it might also be meaningful to you in assessment.
He simply stomewalled and refuse to answer anything Dems ever asked. Most frustrating when
the judicial officer basically had his back and you could not make him do anything. And he knew it.
His comportment and lack of being forthright and contempt for the senate shows his unfitness for this job.
 
Speaking of being a tool, have you ever heard the term "Innocent until proven guilty"? It's what our whole legal system is based on.
It means EVERYONE starts out as INNOCENT and has to be PROVEN GUILTY with FACTS and EVIDENCE. You don't need evidence to prove him innocent.
Comprende? Kapish?
You don't seem to understand that. It's pretty damn simple.
So, I guess that would make YOU the tool.

:0)

Please go sell your snake oil somewhere else. I'm not interested in your attempts to prove yourself holy Pastor.

You've clearly demonstrated that you neither have any proof, nor do you want any. But everyone else needs proof. :0) So damn silly.

You are definitely a tool .. more suited to be talking to right-wing morons who also don't need proof.

You should take that Trumpism image off your posts. #1 .. that's you..
 
I found the question about his belief in god insulting. THat adds zero. In fact, from a smart man, that just makes him a liar.
 
I know .. you don't need any stinkin' proof eithert. Got it.

The problem is that what you don't need is meaningless and we're on to the FBI investigation that those of us who need something more concrete then your emotions.
your side is the ones making shit up like he was an angry drunk, etc.. it's pulled right out your leftist asses. I had this discussion with some other dweebs
I mentioned "hey it's righteous anger he is being accused of gang rape"..but they prefer their delusions he was angry drunk.

The FBI investigation is the last delay tactic...until they can construct something else..another accuser..whatever.
It's a put on
 
your side is the ones making shit up like he was an angry drunk, etc.. it's pulled right out your leftist asses. I had this discussion with some other dweebs
I mentioned "hey it's righteous anger he is being accused of gang rape"..but they prefer their delusions he was angry drunk.

The FBI investigation is the last delay tactic...until they can construct something else..another accuser..whatever.
It's a put on

You don't get it. I don't care what you believe. Believe whatever you want and toss in any word salad you can come up with. I don't care.

What IS, is that we're onto an FBI investigation of Kavanaugh .. don't like it, I don't care about that either. Your judgement is purely partisan .. and you keep reciting the same bullshit over and over .. like the investigation is a delay tactic .. when in fact the investigation would already be over had your side ordered it when this first surfaced.

You don't have anything to prove to me because I simply don't care about Trumptard thought.
 
You don't get it. I don't care what you believe. Believe whatever you want and toss in any word salad you can come up with. I don't care.

What IS, is that were onto an FBI investigation of Kavanaugh .. don't like it, I don't care about that either. Your judgement is purely partisan .. and you keep reciting the same bullshit over and over .. like the investigation is a delay tactic .. when in fact the investigation would already be over had your side ordered it when this first surfaced.

You don't have anything to prove to me because I simply don't care about Trumptard thought.
i love the way you deflect when you got nothing. I'm not proving anything to you. I'm talking thru you to the board.
You've already demonstrated you have no more critical thinking skills since you became uber-partisan.

However I mostly ignore your fantasies unless you quote me. I started this round. I'll end it.
 
i love the way you deflect when you got nothing. I'm not proving anything to you. I'm talking thru you to the board.
You've already demonstrated you have no more critical thinking skills since you became uber-partisan.

However I mostly ignore your fantasies unless you quote me. I started this round. I'll end it.

ARE YOU DEAF?

I don't give a fuck about Trumptard thought. You've been wrong about every goddamn thing you've said.

You have an idiot's perspective about politics.

Is that clear enough for you? Go cry somewhere else.

Kavanaugh's confirmation is far from certain.

I also don't give a fuck about you starting any round .. I just ended it.
 
Sorry, I don't buy this argument. Never have, never will.

It's used to justify white racism in the US.

I'm using it because it's logical and factual.
If you choose to believe something regardless of fact and logic, you'd make a good Evangelical Christian.
And if you choose to antagonize progressive liberal caucasians,
you're lobbying for separate, non-integrated, non-assimilated black culture which is, of course, your prerogative.

It doesn't sound like you're interested in equality.
It sounds like you're interested in retaliation.
Even against whites whose families, like mine, arrived here in the 20th Century and had nothing to do with Jim Crow..
That will be harder to achieve than equality because you'll have far fewer allies.
 
I'm using it because it's logical and factual.
If you choose to believe something regardless of fact and logic, you'd make a good Evangelical Christian.
And if you choose to antagonize progressive liberal caucasians,
you're lobbying for separate, non-integrated, non-assimilated black culture which is, of course, your prerogative.

It doesn't sound like you're interested in equality.
It sounds like you're interested in retaliation.
Even against whites whose families, like mine, arrived here in the 20th Century and had nothing to do with Jim Crow..
That will be harder to achieve than equality because you'll have far fewer allies.

I don't want allies who justify racism............
 
I found the question about his belief in god insulting. THat adds zero. In fact, from a smart man, that just makes him a liar.

The entire charade he put on just proves what Blacks have been saying for decades.

The judicial system is full of racist white partisan men who replaced their kkk hoods for judges robes.

He was angrier than Serena Williams, but his white privilige gives him a pass.

He doesn't need to be a judge at all, let along on the SC.

White people have been preaching to us how judges are impartial, don't take sides, non judgemental, but this judge has proven that myth to be the lie it is.

If I were sentenced to prison under this prick, id be appealing.
 
I don't see it that way. If someone accused you of molesting children, wouldn't that upset you and make you crazy? I know it would me.
How would you like it if you were in a courtroom and someone kept asking you, "Have you ever put your hands on a child's genitals?", "Have you ever pressed your crotch against a child's body?", "Have you ever grabbed a child inappropriately in a sexual manner?".

You really think you could answer those questions and more without getting agitated and emotional? I doubt it. Being accused of that is unsettling. Being accused of that and having to answer those questions in front of a Senate hearing and on national TV is unsettling and traumatic. I doubt you could sit there and calmly answer those questions with zero emotion.

He was acting just like I would expect an innocent person to act and as you know, I'm no fan of Trump. In fact, I loathe, despise and abhor the guy. I hope he gets impeached, convicted and kicked out of office. My opinion of Kavanaugh has nothing to do with how I feel about Trump. And it shouldn't.
Can you honestly say the same thing?

Like the jealous racist white man did Michael Jackson?
 
Serena Williams was angry because she was accused of cheating.

She got ridiculed and made fun of and got called the angry Black woman.

This racist fuck gets a pass.
 
Back
Top