OJ Granted Paole

Getin the ring said:
but yet you still have an opinion that favors OJ, based on racism, or perceived racism,
thus the LZ Granderson quote in your sig
Click to expand...
that is one incredibly HUGE, and incredibly wrong, leap to conclusion, superman

Getin the ring said:
Right is right wrong is wrong, OJ will get what's coming to him when he answers to his maker, here on earth he is just head clown to his clown posse, how do those big red shoes feel
Click to expand...
I hope he enjoys them and I hope he enjoys his judgement at the end.
 
Covfefe said:
He was wife beater, what kind of reward does your god give those kind of guys?
Click to expand...

another assumption, with facts in evidence (history of posts). I'm agnostic. I dont know if there's a god out there or not, nor what rewards he/she may or may not give. My outlook is basically to do what I think is right. If there's a god and it agrees with me, yay. If not, then things should have been made a bit more clearly.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
another assumption, with facts in evidence (history of posts). I'm agnostic. I dont know if there's a god out there or not, nor what rewards he/she may or may not give. My outlook is basically to do what I think is right. If there's a god and it agrees with me, yay. If not, then things should have been made a bit more clearly.
Click to expand...
It's not an assumption, if you mean his being a wife beater, there was evidence of his wife beating, OJ even admitted that he did in the civil trial.
 
Covfefe said:
It's not an assumption, if you mean his being a wife beater, there was evidence of his wife beating, OJ even admitted that he did in the civil trial.
Click to expand...

not what i was talking about. the assumption was about me believing in a god with rewards. I know he was a wife beater, probably will always remain one.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
another assumption, with facts in evidence (history of posts). I'm agnostic. I dont know if there's a god out there or not, nor what rewards he/she may or may not give. My outlook is basically to do what I think is right. If there's a god and it agrees with me, yay. If not, then things should have been made a bit more clearly.
Click to expand...
that will be your defense on judgment day?
yikes, good luck with that
 
SmarterthanYou said:
an unfortunate use of our justice system. the framers knew this could happen. it's preferable that one guilty go free, than have ten innocent incarcerated. most people don't/won't get that.
Click to expand...

Sure. I was listening to Medved yesterday, and he brought-up a popular southern general from the 1850s, who caught his much younger wife having an affair, and murdered her. Naturally he was acquitted, and the public got to follow the who incident via their gossip columns. Stuff like this happens when there is celebrity status and a bit of public sympathy.
 
Threedee said:
Sure. I was listening to Medved yesterday, and he brought-up a popular southern general from the 1850s, who caught his much younger wife having an affair, and murdered her. Naturally he was acquitted, and the public got to follow the who incident via their gossip columns. Stuff like this happens when there is celebrity status and a bit of public sympathy.
Click to expand...

should be a great lesson to proles about elevating celebrities to a status above themselves
 
Irish said:
Everyone knows that trial was a sham. The juror gave him the BPP fist salute at the end of it. He was also found guilty in civil court.
Click to expand...

1) both lawyers have an opportunity to vet prospective jurors. that is their fault that they allowed an obvious racist to sit in on it.
2)civil trials are the real sham. it's an obvious attempt to circumvent the judicial system when failures happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top