Oh those crazy Democrats

its not cheating huh you liar


I have reams of court cases that show your party cheating in elections and being punished for it.


there is NO like record in our courts for the Democratic party
 
evince said:
its not cheating huh you liar


I have reams of court cases that show your party cheating in elections and being punished for it.


there is NO like record in our courts for the Democratic party
Click to expand...

So you think the Democrat party was simply incompetent?

Ok... I agree it could be that.
 
Superfreak said:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ssing-iowa-precinct-sanders-clinton/79693834/



disenfranchising voters? Having them stand in the wrong lines? For Shame



No one in charge? Typical of Democrats



Shocking... more votes than voters. But yeah... Dems don't cheat. [/FONT][/COLOR]
Click to expand...

DES MOINES — It's Iowa's nightmare scenario revisited: An extraordinarily close count in the Iowa caucuses — and reports of chaos in precincts and computer glitches — are raising questions about accuracy of the count and winner.

This time it's the Democrats, not the Republicans.

Even as Hillary Clinton trumpeted her Iowa win in New Hampshire on Tuesday, aides for Bernie Sanders said the eyelash-thin margin raised questions and called for a review. The chairwoman of the Iowa Democratic Party rejected that notion, saying the results are final.
 
I give you right wing liars PROOF your party cheats and you never seem to care that they do


why?
 
evince said:
GOP ballot challenge request denied (UPDATED)





Final update 11:41 am

The Supreme Court on Monday turned down a plea by the national Republican Party to free it from a three-decades-old court order that limits its right to challenge voters’ qualifications. The Republican National Committee had argued that it has obeyed the order diligently and thus it should be lifted; the Democratic National Committee said that violations continue. The case was Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committee (12-373). The Justices offered no explanation, as usual, for denying review. The order list is here.
Click to expand...

What does this have to do with the OP? How do you explain 58 more people than originally checked in? Incompetence? Cheating?

I mean you have the democrat party screwing the democrat party here
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top