Oh Nancy, you tease.

[Jarod]

She doesn't control how they proceed. She has a duty to provide the articles and choose impeachment managers. She isnt doing it.

Is there a time frame required for when she must transmit the articles ?

 

[Micawber]

Hello Southern Chicken,



The urgency is still there but there is no point in sending articles to a rigged Senate.

This is EXACTLY the case. So they should be sent at a time when maximum damage is inflicted.
When that is, I don't know.

 

[Micawber]

Is there a time frame required for when she must transmit the articles ?

Thud goes the mike.

 

[Nordberg]

What Nancy did was make a huge point that Moscow Mitch will not do his job and have a fair and honest trial like the Constitution says is his job.

 

[Southern Chicken]

Is there a time frame required for when she must transmit the articles ?

If he was such a threat , intelligent people would say immediately.. but look at who I am responding to in this thread

 

[Southern Chicken]

Is there a time frame required for when she must transmit the articles ?

What Nancy did was make a huge point that Moscow Mitch will not do his job and have a fair and honest trial like the Constitution says is his job.

She did no such thing. What she done was show that the impeachment was not an urgent matter

 

[Darth Omar]

What Nancy did was make a huge point that Moscow Mitch will not do his job and have a fair and honest trial like the Constitution says is his job.

Well, would calling Hunter Biden and the ‘whistleblower’ constitute a fair trial?

 

[Southern Chicken]

Is there a time frame required for when she must transmit the articles ?

Thud goes the mike.

Wheeze goes the pee on your head.

 

[Southern Chicken]

Is there a time frame required for when she must transmit the articles ?

Well, would calling Hunter Biden and the ‘whistleblower’ constitute a fair trial?

They cant define the term fair trial

 

[Southern Chicken]

Is there a time frame required for when she must transmit the articles ?

This is EXACTLY the case. So they should be sent at a time when maximum damage is inflicted.
When that is, I don't know.

You just don't know period!

 

[Loving91390]

and if your evil fucks kill the Impeachment


he will be Impeached again


and again



and again


and again

YES .... AND RUSSIA , RUSSIA , RUSSIA !

 

[Darth Omar]

They cant define the term fair trial

‘Fair’ means Pelosi calling all the shots.

Except that isn’t exactly constitutional. Pelosi got herself into this mess by allowing a vote which she knew, going in, was going to be along straight party lines. She ran an ‘impeachment stop sign’ and she knew it.

Let her pay the fine.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Hello Darth,



Nancy is playing Trump* like a fiddle. Every day he is tweeting about impeachment. Obviously he is rattled.

If he was really innocent he would be asking for all the witnesses and proclaiming he is ready to be sworn in and take the stand. He would talk directly to the American people about this. Where is his Reagan moment? Now is the time.

We need to hear from the President and all the President's men.

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY

Why do you hate the very judicial principal, that this country was built on??

Why do you hate America??

 

[Southern Chicken]

Is there a time frame required for when she must transmit the articles ?

Hello Southern Chicken,



Clinton testified. Is Trump prepared to take the oath?

Is Trump ready to be sworn in?

Is he ready to swear that he will tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

Clinton Did It.

What's Trump afraid of?

Is Donald Trump now admitting that he is afraid to do what Clinton did?

Is Donald Trump not as much of a man as Bill Clinton?

Is Donald Trump SCARED of doing what Bill Clinton did?

Is he wussing out?

Why does he not come forward and settle this matter once and for all? Address our concerns...

Why does he not speak to the issue, clearly and honestly, and face the nation; under oath?

I wonder if the speaker of the house refuse to transmit the articles of impeachment against clinton to the senate back then....huummmm I guess not. I bet the house left it up to the senate to adjudicate the way they saw fit then...what do you think?

 

[Irish]

She realized the impeachment was a bust, and is basically panicking. She now realizes that embracing the squad, was a mistake but there is nothing she can do now.

 

[Jarod]

If he was such a threat , intelligent people would say immediately.. but look at who I am responding to in this thread

Yes such a threat that we cannot afford to hand the impeachment over to someone who’s already said he is not going to conduct a fair trial.

 

[Jarod]

She did no such thing. What she done was show that the impeachment was not an urgent matter

It’s so urgent she could not afford to Not do everything possible to ensure a fair trial.

 

[Jarod]

Well, would calling Hunter Biden and the ‘whistleblower’ constitute a fair trial?

How would that testimony be relevant?

 

[Darth Omar]

I wonder if the speaker of the house refuse to transmit the articles of impeachment against clinton to the senate back then....huummmm I guess not. I bet the house left it up to the senate to adjudicate the way they saw fit then...what do you think?

It’s not the back then that matters lol.

It’s the from now on. From now on, the House can impeach a president with a simple straight partisan majority. It doesn’t matter if the articles aren’t worth anything since there will be a motivation by the *democrat* president to be acquitted.

Then use the articles to force concessions from the Senate to get a trial to their liking.

Fortunately, I doubt that it will work this time. Pelosi is hiding.

 

[Darth Omar]

How would that testimony be relevant?

That wasn’t the question.

But it would be relevant from the standpoint if Hunter was mixed up in Ukrainian corruption then Trump was justified [actually more justified, since presidents are allowed to *ask* foreign leaders for investigations].

And in Eric Carimella’s case, if there were any shenanigans going on between he and Schiff—people need to know about it.

Democrats want a fair trial, right?