Obamas pleas ignored...

Jarod said:
Im sorry you misinterperted my point. You see what you choose.

My intention was/is/has been to illistrate how inapproperate what she did and has done is/was, especally in the sharp contrast to the events of last weekend.
Click to expand...
Why was it "inappropriate" and how did that quote "illustrate" such a theme? Especially as it was continuously and repeatedly quoted by you immediately following that event and at the time that pundits were all telling us that such rhetoric was the cause of the event. What Palin "did" was done long before that, hence the quote you continued to repeat was even possible.

It's only after you learn that it had zero impact on this lunatic that people tried to crawfish out of their implications.
 
Damocles said:
Why was it "inappropriate" and how did that quote "illustrate" such a theme? Especially as it was continuously and repeatedly quoted by you immediately following that event and at the time that pundits were all telling us that such rhetoric was the cause of the event. What Palin "did" was done long before that, hence the quote you continued to repeat was even possible.

It's only after you learn that it had zero impact on this lunatic that people tried to crawfish out of their implications.
Click to expand...

Show me where a single pundit said it was her fault....

Your imagination is on overdrive.
 
The rhetoric of weapons and crosshairs is inaperproperate in the political context, and many other contexts, because of the very real trajety such imagery is derived from. Its after such a trajety that it is made more clear and that is the time to point it out.

If you are in doubt, why did Sarah Palin take her crosshair ad down the day of the shooting.
 
Dixie said:
Since this is all you seem to know how to post, I am putting you on the ignore list... Sorry, hate it for ya... been nice talking,,, NOT!

Buh bye!
Click to expand...

Way to bury that head in the sand!

Can't be bothered to learn anything that might challenge that nonsense you've spewed for years, now can we?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Way to bury that head in the sand!

Can't be bothered to learn anything that might challenge that nonsense you've spewed for years, now can we?
Click to expand...

Mojo is a troll. Everyone of course is free to "talk" with him if they so choose but the more people who ignore the better.
 
cawacko said:
Mojo is a troll. Everyone of course is free to "talk" with him if they so choose but the more people who ignore the better.
Click to expand...

if Mojo is a troll...

then DY is a troll.

And so is tinfoil...

And so is ID...

And so is usaloyal...


You ready to publicly acknowledge all of them are trolls too?

Because they meet the definition of "troll" being parsed about on these boards.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
if Mojo is a troll...

then DY is a troll.

And so is tinfoil...

And so is ID...

And so is usaloyal...


You ready to publicly acknowledge all of them are trolls too?

Because they meet the definition of "troll" being parsed about on these boards.
Click to expand...

Well for us addicts who spend way too much time on this board it's pretty clear what Mojo does on here and it is trolling. For sh*ts and giggles attempt to have a conversation with him. Ask him a couple of questions and see what kind of discussion you have. I'll tell you you'll have none. His M.O. is a troll. There are non right-leaning posters on this board who have attempted to have discussions with him and he doesn't. He trash talks and is purposefully obtuse to everyone. He is not like the other posters you listed.
 
cawacko said:
Well for us addicts who spend way too much time on this board it's pretty clear what Mojo does on here and it is trolling. For sh*ts and giggles attempt to have a conversation with him. Ask him a couple of questions and see what kind of discussion you have. I'll tell you you'll have none. His M.O. is a troll. There are non right-leaning posters on this board who have attempted to have discussions with him and he doesn't. He trash talks and is purposefully obtuse to everyone. He is not like the other posters you listed.
Click to expand...

ZOMG!

Take Mojo's name out of line 2 of your post and replace it with Damn Yankee...what you have written is a dead solid PERFECT description of Damn Yankee and how he "participates" in debates/ discussion.

He absolutely will NOT discuss ANYTHING with me regardless of topic. He trash talks and is purposely obtuse.

Labeling someone a troll is a purely subjective matter...You may think he's a troll, but if you are going to fairly apply the "guidelines" laid down by old fuzzywig, then there's at LEAST a half dozen posters that SHOULD be included on his "troll" list, who aren't.
 
cawacko said:
Well for us addicts who spend way too much time on this board it's pretty clear what Mojo does on here and it is trolling. For sh*ts and giggles attempt to have a conversation with him. Ask him a couple of questions and see what kind of discussion you have. I'll tell you you'll have none. His M.O. is a troll. There are non right-leaning posters on this board who have attempted to have discussions with him and he doesn't. He trash talks and is purposefully obtuse to everyone. He is not like the other posters you listed.
Click to expand...

Is your idea of attempting "to have discussions with him" posting nonsense and off-topic insults after my posts?

Please post a link to any of my messages that are abusive (if that's what you mean by "trash talk").
 
ZappasGuitar said:
ZOMG!

Take Mojo's name out of line 2 of your post and replace it with Damn Yankee...what you have written is a dead solid PERFECT description of Damn Yankee and how he "participates" in debates/ discussion.

He absolutely will NOT discuss ANYTHING with me regardless of topic. He trash talks and is purposely obtuse.

Labeling someone a troll is a purely subjective matter...You may think he's a troll, but if you are going to fairly apply the "guidelines" laid down by old fuzzywig, then there's at LEAST a half dozen posters that SHOULD be included on his "troll" list, who aren't.
Click to expand...

Yep. And usaliar, what does she do except stalk, snarl and sneer? Not one post on topic, ever. Fits the definition to a "T".
 
Jarod said:
The rhetoric of weapons and crosshairs is inaperproperate in the political context, and many other contexts, because of the very real trajety such imagery is derived from. Its after such a trajety that it is made more clear and that is the time to point it out.

If you are in doubt, why did Sarah Palin take her crosshair ad down the day of the shooting.
Click to expand...
The rhetoric of weapons/crosshairs/targets, etc. are euphemisms used in the English language by both right and left, R's and D's, men and women,young and old, for hundreds of years....THAT is just a fact and its not even debatable....

Where was your outrage, hypocrite, when the left was hanging, shooting, cutting off the head of G. Bush for a full 8 years when he was President?????

Where is your outrage , hypocrite, now when your asshole comrades are calling for the assassination of Sarah Palin...making posters of her with a rifle aimed at her head, etc....?

Not innuendos or in euphemistic ways, but straight out and in your fuckin' face threats....
How about,
Dem Congressman who called for GOP Gov. to be put against a wall and shot now pleads for civility.

"That Scott down there that's running for governor of Florida," Mr. Kanjorski said. "Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him. - Ex-Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs...-be-put-against-wall-and-shot-n#ixzz1B9IkMWLj
-------------
You're not aware of any of this? and if not, ask yourself why?
I've seen it, but I ain't gonna google it up for your sake....
You dont' see it because the left wing news media won't run it on TV and put it in your face like they do with the Palin nonsense that is exaggerated in the extreme for max. effect....to destroy her at all costs....
 
bravo said:
The rhetoric of weapons/crosshairs/targets, etc. are euphemisms used in the English language by both right and left, R's and D's, men and women,young and old, for hundreds of years....THAT is just a fact and its not even debatable....

Where was your outrage, hypocrite, when the left was hanging, shooting, cutting off the head of G. Bush for a full 8 years when he was President?????

Where is your outrage , hypocrite, now when your asshole comrades are calling for the assassination of Sarah Palin...making posters of her with a rifle aimed at her head, etc....?

Not innuendos or in euphemistic ways, but straight out and in your fuckin' face threats....
How about,
Dem Congressman who called for GOP Gov. to be put against a wall and shot now pleads for civility.

"That Scott down there that's running for governor of Florida," Mr. Kanjorski said. "Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him. - Ex-Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs...-be-put-against-wall-and-shot-n#ixzz1B9IkMWLj
-------------
You're not aware of any of this? and if not, ask yourself why?
I've seen it, but I ain't gonna google it up for your sake....
You dont' see it because the left wing news media won't run it on TV and put it in your face like they do with the Palin nonsense that is exaggerated in the extreme for max. effect....to destroy her at all costs....
Click to expand...

First, exactly who has called for "the assassination of Sarah Palin"?

Second, what massacres followed any of the above?
 
Mojo said:
First, exactly who has called for "the assassination of Sarah Palin"?

http://tinyurl.com/2aucavx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3s4YfBKs39Y
http://weaselzippers.us/2011/01/11/classy-liberals-calling-for-assassination-of-sarah-palin/
http://nation.foxnews.com/sarah-pali...#ixzz1B2GumtzL

The sites are getting scrubbed pretty fast....don't delay
...........
Second, what massacres followed any of the above?

Thats quite irrelevant....no one acted because of Sarah Palin either...
so whats your point ?
All ya got is noise left wing hate mongers , like you, Olbermann, Matthews, Ed Shultz, etc....
Click to expand...
.
 
bravo said:
.
Click to expand...

None of your links contains a shred of evidence that anyone actually threatened Ms. Palin, do they?

All I've seen are reports wherein she claimed to have received threats.

Can you post a link to an actual threat?

So because Palin's, Beck's and assorted others' remarks didn't precipitate a massacre, they were OK, whereas the equally-reprehensible remarks made by leftists during Bush's tenure weren't?
 
Mojo said:
None of your links contains a shred of evidence that anyone actually threatened Ms. Palin, do they?

All I've seen are reports wherein she claimed to have received threats.

Can you post a link to an actual threat?

So because Palin's, Beck's and assorted others' remarks didn't precipitate a massacre, they were OK, whereas the equally-reprehensible remarks made by leftists during Bush's tenure weren't?

How did you arrive at this conclusion?...you're the one condemning Beck, Palin and the right in general and none of their remarks caused a massacre, you its YOU that ignore the same rhetoric from the left....whose remarks also didn't cause any massacre...

I'm asking for consistency, if you rant about one, then rant about them all....you see, its YOU doing any ranting at all, I wouldn't even mention them at all if it weren't for the left wingnuts attacking Palin for what amounts to common use of euphemisms that are used by everyone in the country.
Click to expand...

http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/


So you want an actual threat, huh ?

You want me to contact a real live lefty nutjob and have him or her threaten Palin here for you to witness....is that it....

yet you've no problem believing the AZ shooter killed people because of Sarah Palin, with no proof at all...nothing, squat.....

malkin's site isn't gonna cut it for you......I understand perfectly.
 
Last edited:
ZappasGuitar said:
ZOMG!

Take Mojo's name out of line 2 of your post and replace it with Damn Yankee...what you have written is a dead solid PERFECT description of Damn Yankee and how he "participates" in debates/ discussion.

He absolutely will NOT discuss ANYTHING with me regardless of topic. He trash talks and is purposely obtuse.

Labeling someone a troll is a purely subjective matter...You may think he's a troll, but if you are going to fairly apply the "guidelines" laid down by old fuzzywig, then there's at LEAST a half dozen posters that SHOULD be included on his "troll" list, who aren't.
Click to expand...

Stop being so fucking gay, Dik.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top