Obama's "Plan"

Sorry, I said I wanted to see the details of the president's plan, not the outline of the president's joke.

Yes, I said "joke" because it's obvious that's what this is, anyone can see the humor. First of all, the math is being calculated by the same people who claim they have saved or created 2.2 million jobs, even though unemployment has gone up 2.5%. So they start off by promising $2 trillion in budget cuts, which are never specified, other than to say they are going to come from discretionary spending and security. Then, they add $1 trillion in tax reform... but Obama himself, already admitted that increasing tax rates on top marginal incomes would not generate more revenues, he told Joe the Plumber he wanted to do it for "fairness." We also have the US Treasury figures over the years, for when we've raised top marginal rates, and it resulted in LESS revenue. It's just a flat out lie that tax reform will lead to $1 trillion in savings, unless Obama plans to heavily tax the middle class AND the poor.

Finally, if this is not enough bullshit to shovel off as a "plan".... they have the audacity to claim another $1 trillion in savings on the debt interest! Yes... this is based, you see, on the phantom unspecified $2 trillion cuts and the mythical non-existent increase in revenue from a tax increase, both of which will never materialize. Basically, Obama's "PLAN" is a speech full of platitudes and demagoguing.

If Obama is under the impression that a higher marginal tax rate will not create additional revenue, he's incorrect.
 
this degenerate flag of JEWmerica?

What is that flag ?.....is that the one that Obama uses by the dozens in the background for all his speeches....???

Is he using the flag of JEWMERICA ??? Wtf is JEWMERICA anyway.....???

Are you coining a new word ?

Tells us Waterbrain....just what are you talking about ?
 
Did I? That is a really stupid lie. I even talked about how President Obama's approval rating was higher in another post that you read. Also, stating his disapproval rating is higher, does not mean I failed to notice his approval rating his higher. You just want to ignore reality because it makes you cry because you realize how dumb you for repeatedly posting your poll.

It would be appreciated if you could apologize for your lie. It would go a long way in improving what little credibility you have.

I guess \\(liar)// is not going to apologize.
 
According to polls, a generic repubican beats him. That's pitiful. He might have a chance if this was "The Magic Kingdom", but we're talking about people who are hurting from high food prices, high gas prices, no jobs, etc. Obama's own job czar, the CEO of GE, just sent an entire division and thousands of jobs over to China, and GE didn't pay anything in taxes. Hope and change is over. Your President is a fake.

Let's try again.

First a primer on words and their use.

When I asked "exactly" I asked for the opposite of generic, i.e. specific. Hence not giving an actual name does not answer the question.

So, in layman's terms,

Which of the current feild of republican candidates can beat Obama in '12?

Feel free to ask for clarification if the question is still too difficult for you to follow.
 
Well, in context....generic would mean ANY of those in the current Republican field....no need to be specific....

"English 101" and "Introduction to Reading Comprehension " for 3rd Grade
 
Well, in context....generic would mean ANY of those in the current Republican field....no need to be specific....

"English 101" and "Introduction to Reading Comprehension " for 3rd Grade

It would be interesting if the Republican Party could run "Generic Republican Candidate".

However, actually producing a named candidate is proving to be somewhat complicated, no? Given Obama's position and his massive flaws surely the lack of a credible candidate from the opposition is more than a little worrying?
 
It would be interesting if the Republican Party could run "Generic Republican Candidate".

However, actually producing a named candidate is proving to be somewhat complicated, no? Given Obama's position and his massive flaws surely the lack of a credible candidate from the opposition is more than a little worrying?
Complicated ? Not at all.....there will be a convention and a vote as always....its the same every four years....

but your right about heavy opposition.....when the liberal media starts politicking for Obama and the pinheads get in full swing.....it will be an uphill fight for sure.....
 
Let's try again.

First a primer on words and their use.

When I asked "exactly" I asked for the opposite of generic, i.e. specific. Hence not giving an actual name does not answer the question.

So, in layman's terms,

Which of the current feild of republican candidates can beat Obama in '12?

Feel free to ask for clarification if the question is still too difficult for you to follow.

Could you point out this "feild" that you speak of?
 
Complicated ? Not at all.....there will be a convention and a vote as always....its the same every four years....

but your right about heavy opposition.....when the liberal media starts politicking for Obama and the pinheads get in full swing.....it will be an uphill fight for sure.....

Come on mate, Obama is really, really, in the shit. And most of the Republicans on the board are hardly shy in pointing it out.

There does seem to be credible Republican candidates, with a decent shot of unseating Barack Obamas, but they've all decided to sit it out this time round. Why? Is it because nobody really wants to have a crack at this economy with a Republican party which can't seem to hold itself together for 5 minutes?
 
Come on mate, Obama is really, really, in the shit. And most of the Republicans on the board are hardly shy in pointing it out.

There does seem to be credible Republican candidates, with a decent shot of unseating Barack Obamas, but they've all decided to sit it out this time round. Why? Is it because nobody really wants to have a crack at this economy with a Republican party which can't seem to hold itself together for 5 minutes?

Well, the steaks are high, friend....the steaks are high and American people fickle, more than a little stupid, short sighted and memory disadvantaged,....and highly fragmented by race and even nationality....

Hispanics are more Hispanic than US citizen, Jews are more Jew than US citizen, and blacks depend on the welfare system more than anyone dares to admit for fear of being branded a racist.....personally, I don't give a shit.....facts are facts, sad as they may be.....

and last but not least....the Hollywood rich are spoiled, and naively pinheaded, while the younger voters are ignorant, idealistic and liberal to a fault........

The only real patriots are those old enough to know about WWII ...the vets and most of the military and their families...and we are outnumbered......outnumbered and getting old....
 
Last edited:
Could you point out this "feild" that you speak of?

You of all would bother with MY spelling? That is a bit much Sir. I admit to being a poor speller, it has little bearing on my thought process. Must I now review your recent posts and cite your errors?

It certainly would not require great effort.
 
Well, in context....generic would mean ANY of those in the current Republican field....no need to be specific....

"English 101" and "Introduction to Reading Comprehension " for 3rd Grade

Is it really too hard for you to understand that I asked a specific question?

To underscore the stupidity of your answer further, it would be quite wonderful for the GOP if only there were a "Generic" candidate; there is not, however. Every GOP candidate has vast tragic flaws which will prevent their ascension.
 
Complicated ? Not at all.....there will be a convention and a vote as always....its the same every four years....

but your right about heavy opposition.....when the liberal media starts politicking for Obama and the pinheads get in full swing.....it will be an uphill fight for sure.....

Bravo, known forum wide for his retarded posts actualy catches Stalin with the particularly stupid effort. So now the media, owned by vast coporations spanning the globe are liberal?

Double face palm for that one both of you morons.
 
Well, the steaks are high, friend....the steaks are high and American people fickle, more than a little stupid, short sighted and memory disadvantaged,....and highly fragmented by race and even nationality....

Hispanics are more Hispanic than US citizen, Jews are more Jew than US citizen, and blacks depend on the welfare system more than anyone dares to admit for fear of being branded a racist.....personally, I don't give a shit.....facts are facts, sad as they may be.....

and last but not least....the Hollywood rich are spoiled, and naively pinheaded, while the younger voters are ignorant, idealistic and liberal to a fault........

The only real patriots are those old enough to know about WWII ...the vets and most of the military and their families...and we are outnumbered......outnumbered and getting old....

That is sad Bravo, I feel bad for you, outnumbered, old, dying and all that. Your case made even worse by your stupidity. So tell me, how do you take your steak? I like medium, I imagine you for rare, especialy when the stakes are high, as they are now.
 
Well, the steaks are high, friend....the steaks are high and American people fickle, more than a little stupid, short sighted and memory disadvantaged,....and highly fragmented by race and even nationality....

Hispanics are more Hispanic than US citizen, Jews are more Jew than US citizen, and blacks depend on the welfare system more than anyone dares to admit for fear of being branded a racist.....personally, I don't give a shit.....facts are facts, sad as they may be.....

and last but not least....the Hollywood rich are spoiled, and naively pinheaded, while the younger voters are ignorant, idealistic and liberal to a fault........

The only real patriots are those old enough to know about WWII ...the vets and most of the military and their families...and we are outnumbered......outnumbered and getting old....

What a moron. Steaks??????? For real? Steaks? How about stakes, you idiot? Stakes are high.
Who are you to challenge anyone's patriotism, citizenship, religion, or lot in life? If any blacks are on welfare (statistics show that the largest group receiving welfare would be "whites"), it is the result of the systematic discrimination against and segregation of blacks, denying them equal opportunity and the privileges afforded whites. Make no mistake.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,974473,00.html

http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/T214JD55H1AU6P4A5
Based on the 2006 TOTAL population of each respective race in the United States, it is:

5.27% white*(5.27% of the white population is on welfare)
27.78% black*(27.78% of the black population is on welfare)
11.47% Hispanic***(11.47% of the Hispanic population is on welfare)

Another way to look at this data is based on the total number of people who receive welfare.

1 in 18 whites receive welfare.
1 in 3.5 blacks receive welfare



Just as you say, "facts are facts", sad as they really may be. - poet.
 
What a moron. Steaks??????? For real? Steaks? How about stakes, you idiot? Stakes are high.
Who are you to challenge anyone's patriotism, citizenship, religion, or lot in life? If any blacks are on welfare (statistics show that the largest group receiving welfare would be "whites"), it is the result of the systematic discrimination against and segregation of blacks, denying them equal opportunity and the privileges afforded whites. Make no mistake.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,974473,00.html

http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/T214JD55H1AU6P4A5
Based on the 2006 TOTAL population of each respective race in the United States, it is:

5.27% white*(5.27% of the white population is on welfare)
27.78% black*(27.78% of the black population is on welfare)
11.47% Hispanic***(11.47% of the Hispanic population is on welfare)

Another way to look at this data is based on the total number of people who receive welfare.

1 in 18 whites receive welfare.
1 in 3.5 blacks receive welfare



Just as you say, "facts are facts", sad as they really may be. - poet.


(5.27% of the white population is on welfare)
(27.78% of the black population is on welfare)

Thanks for proving my point, spelling nazi.....spelling? Thats what you got? How desperate you must be....

systematic discrimination against and segregation of blacks, denying them equal opportunity ? Really...?

These excuses are long worn out....its like the mantra of blaming Bush for everything that goes wrong.....

Its time to fix your problems rather than looking for others to blame.....
 
Last edited:
(5.27% of the white population is on welfare)
(27.78% of the black population is on welfare)

Thanks for proving my point, spelling nazi.....spelling? Thats what you got? How desperate you must be....

systematic discrimination against and segregation of blacks, denying them equal opportunity ? Really...?

These excuses are long worn out....its like the mantra of blaming Bush for everything that goes wrong.....

Its time to fix your problems rather than looking for others to blame.....

Must have been nice growing up white, male and in the U.S. No, Bravo, you didn't have any advantages whatsoever.

You know, this post is SO FUCKING RETARDED I am going to buy a thesarus to come up with new synonyms of stupid, just for you.

Oh, and Dixtard, glad to see you agree with Bravo.
 
(5.27% of the white population is on welfare)
(27.78% of the black population is on welfare)

Thanks for proving my point, spelling nazi.....spelling? Thats what you got? How desperate you must be....

systematic discrimination against and segregation of blacks, denying them equal opportunity ? Really...?

These excuses are long worn out....its like the mantra of blaming Bush for everything that goes wrong.....

Its time to fix your problems rather than looking for others to blame.....

You've got to wonder, how many decades does the Federal court have to send people to prison for violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964, before pinheads acknowledge racial discrimination is punishable by law? Sometimes I read these outrageous claims and arguments, and I wonder if these people really still live in 1954 America... do they think society hasn't changed? Do they believe the laws have never changed? Perhaps they think black people are still being intentionally denied access to the political process?

You see, Civil Rights is a classic example of how you can never ever please a liberal. Doesn't matter what we do, how many laws we pass, how much we go out of our way as a society to appease the liberals, they simply act as if nothing has ever been done to address their concerns. Here we are, 47 years from the CRA and Voting Rights, Martin Luther King, etc... and pinheads are still arguing that we discriminate against blacks. It's almost as if, making things equal for blacks wasn't good enough, we must go further. What would satisfy a liberal? Oh, it doesn't matter, because they can't be satisfied. You see, their liberal white guilt is what fuels this stupidity from them, we can pass all the laws we want, it will never be enough to erase their own racist mentality. Therefore, the ONLY way we can ever truly have racial equality in America, is to bleach all black people white or dye all white people black, so that liberals can't tell the difference.
 
(5.27% of the white population is on welfare)
(27.78% of the black population is on welfare)

Thanks for proving my point, spelling nazi.....spelling? Thats what you got? How desperate you must be....

systematic discrimination against and segregation of blacks, denying them equal opportunity ? Really...?

These excuses are long worn out....its like the mantra of blaming Bush for everything that goes wrong.....

Its time to fix your problems rather than looking for others to blame.....

Being a democrat means keeping in place "free money"aka welfare. Free money, at the tax payers expense, so that democrats can keep a voting block poor and dependent- now that's slavery!
 
Back
Top