Obama Used Psuedonym To Email Clinton on Private Server

[anatta]

President Obama used an undisclosed pseudonym to communicate with then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on her private email server – shocking her top aide Huma Abedin when she learned of it.

“How is that not classified?” Abedin “exclaimed” to investigators when shown a copy of the 2012 exchange between Clinton and Obama, according to a trove of 189-pages of FBI documents dumped Friday night into Clinton’s use of the private server.

After learning that the president used email with a pseudonym — apparently to try to protect his identity — Abedin asked her interrogators if she could keep a copy of the email.

The FBI documents don’t reveal if they let Abedin take a copy home with her.

Although tens of thousands of Clinton’s emails have been made public since it was revealed she had exclusively used a private email server to conduct official work, emails with the president have been exempt from disclosure.

“This exchange strongly suggests Clinton and the president knowingly discussed classified material in an unclassified setting and hence broke the law,” Raj Shah, the research director at the Republican National Committee, told the Post.

But a rep for Clinton downplayed the documents significance.

The documents also show IT workers for Platte River Networks — the external company that hosted Clinton’s server — referred in an internal work ticket to “the Hilary [sic] coverup [sic] operation” when their client asked for changes to email retention and archive/email cleanup. A worker later said the term was a joke.

The Trump campaign immediately seized on this, with senior communications advisor Jason Miller saying: “there was a concerted effort to systematically destroy potentially incriminating information.”

“It’s no wonder that at least five individuals tied to the email scandal, including Clinton’s top State Department aide and attorney Cheryl Mills, secured immunity deals from the Obama Justice Department to avoid prosecution,” Miller added, referring to news Friday of additional Clinton aides receiving protection from the FBI so they could speak to authorities.
http://nypost.com/2016/09/24/obama-used-pseudonym-to-talk-with-hillary-on-private-server/

 

[anatta]

more from the FBI's last night Friday document dump

 

[domer76]

more from the FBI's last night Friday document dump

From the RNC. Is that the best they have? lol


"This exchange strongly suggests Clinton and the president knowingly discussed classified material in an unclassified setting and hence broke the law,” Raj Shah, the research director at the Republican National Committee, told the Post."

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

From the RNC. Is that the best they have? lol


"This exchange strongly suggests Clinton and the president knowingly discussed classified material in an unclassified setting and hence broke the law,” Raj Shah, the research director at the Republican National Committee, told the Post."

Presidential power is the origin of the classification system. It is initiated through executive order. It's impossible for the president to illegally reveal classified information. He has no need to know (imagine the absurdity of classified information being withheld from the president), he has no responsibility not to reveal whatever he wishes to reveal.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

I

don't

care

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Annata would abolish democracy and establish a white supremacist, fascist dictatorship because of some stupid e-mails nobodies going to remember in a decade.

 

[tsuke]

Annata would abolish democracy and establish a white supremacist, fascist dictatorship because of some stupid e-mails nobodies going to remember in a decade.

or that they show that the alternative to a white supremasict fascist dictatorship is a monarchy where the leaders are determined to remove FOIA and other means the people have to hold them accountable.

 

[anatta]

From the RNC. Is that the best they have? lol


"This exchange strongly suggests Clinton and the president knowingly discussed classified material in an unclassified setting and hence broke the law,” Raj Shah, the research director at the Republican National Committee, told the Post."

forget the RNC's talking point -look at this:

“How is that not classified?” Abedin “exclaimed” to investigators when shown a copy of the 2012 exchange between Clinton and Obama, according to a trove of 189-pages of FBI documents dumped Friday night into Clinton’s use of the private server.

so now we got POTUS on her private server.
and either he knows it's bogus and is dodging the fact it's not on a "high side" .gov server .or he doesn't care -or he thinks a pseudonym is somehow going to
be able to cloak ( inherently) privledged communication.

OR

He is not up on the fact at all HRClinton is not using a classified account to converse. ( if he didn't notice it wasn't a .gov Email)
Meaning either Clinton's "extreme carelessness" ( per Comey) results in lax protocol no matter what scenario is true.

 

[Legion Troll]

or that they show that the alternative to a white supremasict fascist dictatorship is a monarchy where the leaders are determined to remove FOIA and other means the people have to hold them accountable.

Think so? Will you hold your idol accountable when he is elected?

 

[domer76]

forget the RNC's talking point -look at this:

so now we got POTUS on her private server.
and either he knows it's bogus and is dodging the fact it's not on a "high side" .gov server .or he doesn't care -or he thinks a pseudonym is somehow going to
be able to cloak ( inherently) privledged communication.

OR

He is not up on the fact at all HRClinton is not using a classified account to converse. ( if he didn't notice it wasn't a .gov Email)
Meaning either Clinton's "extreme carelessness" ( per Comey) results in lax protocol no matter what scenario is true.

Why is "exclaimed" in quotes? Because it's someone's inserted opinion?

This is a tabloid story. I'd have to see the real deal before I believe a word of it.

 

[Legion Troll]

Why is "exclaimed" in quotes? Because it's someone's inserted opinion?

This is a tabloid story. I'd have to see the real deal before I believe a word of it.

Bbbbbut...Huma!... Lesbian! ... Muslim Brotherhood!

 

[anatta]

Why is "exclaimed" in quotes? Because it's someone's inserted opinion?

This is a tabloid story. I'd have to see the real deal before I believe a word of it.

"exclaimed" is an emotional speech. "gasped" would be the same thing - the emotions behind Abedin's utterance aren't important.

 

[domer76]

"exclaimed" is an emotional speech. "gasped" would be the same thing - the emotions behind Abedin's utterance aren't important.

I see. Is that why the tabloid felt a need to include the emotion? From a printed document?

Do you notice the smell?

 

[Legion Troll]

I see. Is that why the tabloid felt a need to include the emotion? From a printed document?

Do you notice the smell?

Oxycontin dulls the sense of smell, I hear.

 

[anatta]

I see. Is that why the tabloid felt a need to include the emotion? From a printed document?

Do you notice the smell?

I have to see the document,, who knows..none of this minutia matters.
It's silly nitpicking

 

[Legion Troll]

I have to see the document,, who knows..none of this minutia matters. It's silly nitpicking

So you suddenly don't care now that Domer pointed out the obvious.

 

[anatta]

So you suddenly don't care now that Domer pointed out the obvious.

obvious minutia..
There is no point debating anything else with him-he's got his mind made up.

The Emails are complicated -the storyline ( and I don't mean "narrative") is a serial descent from Hillary's big lies
to desperate clinging to Comey.

But every time I think it's played out -some new grotesque twist comes along to make it yet more reprehensible

 

[Legion Troll]

There is no point debating anything else with him-he's got his mind made up.

Irony abounds.

 

[anatta]

State IT official warned Clinton 'inner circle' about concerns with email setup

The State Department technician who set up Hillary Clinton’s private server told FBI officials that he conveyed internal concerns that the setup violated federal record-keeping rules to Clinton’s “inner circle,” according to investigation notes released Friday afternoon.

Bryan Pagliano told investigators that in 2009, two State IT specialists asked him whether he was aware of the clintonemail.com domain, then asked him to relay to Clinton’s team that the server could be a federal records retention issue.

Pagliano conveyed the message to Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s chief of staff during her tenure as secretary of State.
He told investigators that Mills replied that other secretaries of State had also used private email accounts, citing Colin Powell.* Not a private server*

The details come from 189 pages of notes from the FBI’s interviews with State officials, Clinton aides, IT technicians who worked on the server and others, released late Friday afternoon.

The pages contain a few previously-unknown tidbits — including the revelation that Clinton at one point had a Gmail account, used so an unnamed aide could send her articles of interest to read.
But the aide said he was “fairly sure” that the account was never used after it was opened.

Many of the officials interviewed expressed little alarm about the email set-up, describing it largely as business as usual.

One official, whose name was withheld from the FBI, did appear shocked when shown an email exchange that had been sent through the unclassified server.

“Wow,” the official responded, before declining to answer further questions on the exchange. When he was escorted to the elevator following the interview, the official told an agent that “after seeing the above referenced documents, he now understood why people were concerned about this matter.”

Pagliano and Mills both received some form of immunity from the Department of Justice for their participation in the probe.

Mills’s deal is restricted to information found on a laptop computer she used to sort Clinton’s private emails from the work emails turned over to the State Department in December 2014.

Dozens of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) cases on Clinton’s private email are still working their way through the civil court system.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...al-warned-clinton-inner-circle-about-internal

 

[domer76]

State IT official warned Clinton 'inner circle' about concerns with email setup

The State Department technician who set up Hillary Clinton’s private server told FBI officials that he conveyed internal concerns that the setup violated federal record-keeping rules to Clinton’s “inner circle,” according to investigation notes released Friday afternoon.

Bryan Pagliano told investigators that in 2009, two State IT specialists asked him whether he was aware of the clintonemail.com domain, then asked him to relay to Clinton’s team that the server could be a federal records retention issue.

Pagliano conveyed the message to Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s chief of staff during her tenure as secretary of State.
He told investigators that Mills replied that other secretaries of State had also used private email accounts, citing Colin Powell.* Not a private server*

The details come from 189 pages of notes from the FBI’s interviews with State officials, Clinton aides, IT technicians who worked on the server and others, released late Friday afternoon.

The pages contain a few previously-unknown tidbits — including the revelation that Clinton at one point had a Gmail account, used so an unnamed aide could send her articles of interest to read.
But the aide said he was “fairly sure” that the account was never used after it was opened.

Many of the officials interviewed expressed little alarm about the email set-up, describing it largely as business as usual.

One official, whose name was withheld from the FBI, did appear shocked when shown an email exchange that had been sent through the unclassified server.

“Wow,” the official responded, before declining to answer further questions on the exchange. When he was escorted to the elevator following the interview, the official told an agent that “after seeing the above referenced documents, he now understood why people were concerned about this matter.”

Pagliano and Mills both received some form of immunity from the Department of Justice for their participation in the probe.

Mills’s deal is restricted to information found on a laptop computer she used to sort Clinton’s private emails from the work emails turned over to the State Department in December 2014.

Dozens of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) cases on Clinton’s private email are still working their way through the civil court system.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...al-warned-clinton-inner-circle-about-internal

We need another investigation.