Obama screwing the millennials

why does the right have to keep people from voting to win elections?


because they are antidemocratic
 
evince said:
why does the right have to keep people from voting to win elections?


because they are antidemocratic
Click to expand...

why does the left refuse to get poor people ID's? Because they want to keep them down. Without jobs. Without bank accounts. Slaves to the system.

Because you hate poor people.
 
Without poor people, there would be no Democrat Party. Thus their war on poverty, which has created more poverty.
 
Superfreak said:
Yes, it does. Now run along douche. Can't help but wonder why you never question people who constantly proclaim the Kochs are running everything. Funny that.
Click to expand...

Show me where in that other thread or the linked article it states that "Soros spent more money buying elections for Dems than the Koch brothers did for Reps." Quote it.

What's funny is that you still fail to understand that I get to write about what I want to write about. And right now I'm writing about how you're a liar.
 
evince said:
and your glad your child will not vote?
Click to expand...

I didn't say that.

Her reasons were arrived at due to her disappointment with Obama. The large majority of young people have historically not voted. Obama's first run changed that. His failures to do as promised has turned off that involvement.
 
At least Obama engaged people, even if it was through something that was somewhat unsubstantial it lead to a president who has been more inspiring than the last shit head you guys voted in. Plus he brought in mandatory insurance which, while despised by mad right wingers and Unabomber types like super freak will eventually be recognised as a huge step forward for the medical system in the United States.

Those adverts are fucking awful, please say they are a joke.
 
Bonestorm said:
Show me where in that other thread or the linked article it states that "Soros spent more money buying elections for Dems than the Koch brothers did for Reps." Quote it.

What's funny is that you still fail to understand that I get to write about what I want to write about. And right now I'm writing about how you're a liar.
Click to expand...

What is funny is that you call me a liar with no evidence. Then you expect me to run around defending myself from your baseless accusations. You see, I too get to write what I want. and right now I am calling you a pathetic douche bag hypocrite.
 
reverendlionelblair said:
At least Obama engaged people, even if it was through something that was somewhat unsubstantial it lead to a president who has been more inspiring than the last shit head you guys voted in. Plus he brought in mandatory insurance which, while despised by mad right wingers and Unabomber types like super freak will eventually be recognised as a huge step forward for the medical system in the United States.

Those adverts are fucking awful, please say they are a joke.
Click to expand...

No, they are not a joke. Two groups here in CO put them up. The 12 year old in charge was mocked on the Daily Show, yet he was not intelligent enough to realize it.
 
Superfreak said:
What is funny is that you call me a liar with no evidence. Then you expect me to run around defending myself from your baseless accusations. You see, I too get to write what I want. and right now I am calling you a pathetic douche bag hypocrite.
Click to expand...


I am calling you a liar because you made an assertion without providing a source and when I asked for the source you lied about it..

A normal person in your shoes in possession of the evidence to support the assertion would provide the evidence at the point. A normal person in your shoes lacking said evidence would admit that the assertion was unsupported by the source provided and would maybe apologize for being mistaken. You, on the other hand, elect to do the above. While not the least bit surprising given your history, it's really weird.

Also, too:

 
Bonestorm said:
I am calling you a liar because you made an assertion without providing a source and when I asked for the source you lied about it..

A normal person in your shoes in possession of the evidence to support the assertion would provide the evidence at the point. A normal person in your shoes lacking said evidence would admit that the assertion was unsupported by the source provided and would maybe apologize for being mistaken. You, on the other hand, elect to do the above. While not the least bit surprising given your history, it's really weird.

Also, too:
Click to expand...

Nope... it was right there where I told you it was. I am not your errand boy. go read the link again. Now stop being a whiny little douche bag and run along.
 
Taft2016 said:
Did Obama ever have a moment a fraction as inspirational as this?



Jeezus, listen to how he spoke:

"I didn't want people to think their President was incapable of finding the plate."

He understood he was just there as a representative of us. He was "our President." He understood that the job was not all about himself.

Contrast that demeanor with that of the current Narcissist-in-Chief, who on a daily basis breaks new records for using the words "I" and "me."

I miss having a man in the White House.
Click to expand...
 
Superfreak said:
Nope... it was right there where I told you it was. I am not your errand boy. go read the link again. Now stop being a whiny little douche bag and run along.
Click to expand...

So can you pinpoint the moment in your life that you decided to toss out your integrity and replace it with aggressive assholery or was it more of a gradual process?

Actually, don't bother answering that since I'm sure you'd just lie anyway.
 
healthcare is the message so far, unless that changes the Senate red states could very well go...well red..lol.

6 seats is a lot, and the Repubs find new creative ways to lose - but if I were betting...lol..i'm not..

ya. ok. Senate goes Republican/prediction :rolleyes:
 
Superfreak said:
Did you know that Soros spent more money buying elections for Dems than the Koch brothers did for Reps?

Why don't you cry about the billionaires lining pockets of Dems Desh? Could it be you are a partisan hack?
Click to expand...

dear fucking idiot,


paying for campaigns is NOT the same as paying for people to have their right to vote obstructed.

Your party has worked for decades to keep black people from voting
 
Bonestorm said:
Show me where in that other thread or the linked article it states that "Soros spent more money buying elections for Dems than the Koch brothers did for Reps." Quote it.

What's funny is that you still fail to understand that I get to write about what I want to write about. And right now I'm writing about how you're a liar.
Click to expand...

he fucking lies all day long.

hes a sociopath
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top