Obama passing the buck?

Show me the mistakes Obama has made on BP & in the response to this that are comparable to the Bush mistakes I cited.

lets see...you've shown brownie was a mistake, you said bush was slow, 3 days...

obama...who is heading up the clean up process? they don't seem to be doing a good job, so equal there...slow...obama has taken longer than 3 days, to my knowledge, he hasn't even flown over the affected area...for now, this seems about equal....

at this point, they seem equal to what you're claiming bush's mistakes were, i agree on brownie, because bush hired him, i don't agree on the 3 day lag though or him being at his ranch as being a hinderance
 
lets see...you've shown brownie was a mistake, you said bush was slow, 3 days...

obama...who is heading up the clean up process? they don't seem to be doing a good job, so equal there...slow...obama has taken longer than 3 days, to my knowledge, he hasn't even flown over the affected area...for now, this seems about equal....

at this point, they seem equal to what you're claiming bush's mistakes were, i agree on brownie, because bush hired him, i don't agree on the 3 day lag though or him being at his ranch as being a hinderance

The bolded is amazing - simply amazing.

And I'm the one with blinders?

Sure.
 
The bolded is amazing - simply amazing.

And I'm the one with blinders?

Sure.

really? bush was blasted for flying over, by not stopping....you asked for a comparison, so bush flew over, thus seeing for himself the damage, obama hasn't and obama has taken longer to respond

why don't you explain how what i posted is blinders? its obvious you can't actually debate it or else you would have....

next
 
really? bush was blasted for flying over, by not stopping....you asked for a comparison, so bush flew over, thus seeing for himself the damage, obama hasn't and obama has taken longer to respond

why don't you explain how what i posted is blinders? its obvious you can't actually debate it or else you would have....

next

And to you, an offfshore spill is similar to the flooding of a city, with thousands stranded and massive destruction of homes & property?
 
And to you, an offfshore spill is similar to the flooding of a city, with thousands stranded and massive destruction of homes & property?

the magnitude of harm....similar, but not the same

just look how severe you are saying it is....its good that we finally have you down to "well" they aren't similar....instead of your previous partisan nonsense
 
the magnitude of harm....similar, but not the same

just look how severe you are saying it is....its good that we finally have you down to "well" they aren't similar....instead of your previous partisan nonsense

No one is even suggesting a "flyover" for an oil spill; it's truly ridiculous to compare these 2 situations. Lives aren't in danger here; people aren't trapped. This is an economic & ecological disaster.

I don't blame Bush for delaying his "flyover." I didn't like his lackadasical, delayed response to such a crisis situation, but that has little to do with a "flyover." He was there, 2 days prior, assuring them that the Feds were ready for anything; he's the one who appointed a crony - a guy who worked with stallions, & who had NO emergency experience.

I understand that in your world, Bush was a bystander during his Presidency, and bears no accountability. However, he made clear mistakes & miscalculations with regard to Katrina, and that is part of history.

There is no such negligence, lack of response or cronyism that you have shown for Obama in this case, nor is the situation comparable in any other way that you are discussing. At best, it's a massive stretch...how can you not see that?
 
No one is even suggesting a "flyover" for an oil spill; it's truly ridiculous to compare these 2 situations. Lives aren't in danger here; people aren't trapped. This is an economic & ecological disaster.

I don't blame Bush for delaying his "flyover." I didn't like his lackadasical, delayed response to such a crisis situation, but that has little to do with a "flyover." He was there, 2 days prior, assuring them that the Feds were ready for anything; he's the one who appointed a crony - a guy who worked with stallions, & who had NO emergency experience.

I understand that in your world, Bush was a bystander during his Presidency, and bears no accountability. However, he made clear mistakes & miscalculations with regard to Katrina, and that is part of history.

There is no such negligence, lack of response or cronyism that you have shown for Obama in this case, nor is the situation comparable in any other way that you are discussing. At best, it's a massive stretch...how can you not see that?

do you ever tire of your dishonesty? sayhing i think bush bears no accountability is simply untrue. go back and read my posts, i have held bush accountable, especially for hiring brownie, but i'm not surprised you've already turned to your typical dishonest bullshit since you obviously can't continue to justify your stance.

it doesn't matter if its cronyism...if obama hires someone who fucks up, the end result is the same, the reasons for the hire don't matter in the end, only to hacks like you.
 
do you ever tire of your dishonesty? sayhing i think bush bears no accountability is simply untrue. go back and read my posts, i have held bush accountable, especially for hiring brownie, but i'm not surprised you've already turned to your typical dishonest bullshit since you obviously can't continue to justify your stance.

it doesn't matter if its cronyism...if obama hires someone who fucks up, the end result is the same, the reasons for the hire don't matter in the end, only to hacks like you.

Who did Obama hire at BP?
 
imagine if bush would have said virtually the same thing, but instead expressed frustration with mayor nagin and governor blanco
Yea and you'll be the same hypocrit calling him a socialist or a dictator when Obama sends in the corp of engineers in to permanently seal off the well head against BP's wishes.
 
it is not a strawman, you're just desperate to defend obama at all cost...unless you show the link is false in what the administration said, i'll stand by post. when the shit hit the fan, but took full responsibility, mentioning brownie is simply partisan nonsense. already obama is saying their doing a good job (so akin to brownie if you really want to go there) and expressing frustration with BP....ie, blaming them while congratulating themselves....
Oncie right....you can smell the straw burning a mile away.
 
Where am I defending Nagin? His response was pathetic. So was that of Bush & the Feds.

And so is BP's skimping on the valve - just look at the cost.

That's the strawman. I don't even know what you're trying to compare. This is beyond a stretch, even for your usual "if Bush did this" Obama gotcha's.
PWNGE BY ONCIE!
 
do you ever tire of your dishonesty? sayhing i think bush bears no accountability is simply untrue. go back and read my posts, i have held bush accountable, especially for hiring brownie, but i'm not surprised you've already turned to your typical dishonest bullshit since you obviously can't continue to justify your stance.

it doesn't matter if its cronyism...if obama hires someone who fucks up, the end result is the same, the reasons for the hire don't matter in the end, only to hacks like you.
Haa! That's a laugh. This is the biggest pwnage in a debate since I debated Dixie on Macroevolution. Oncie has savaged your position point by bloody point. You've been pwned! LOL
 
it is not a strawman, you're just desperate to defend obama at all cost...unless you show the link is false in what the administration said, i'll stand by post. when the shit hit the fan, but took full responsibility, mentioning brownie is simply partisan nonsense. already obama is saying their doing a good job (so akin to brownie if you really want to go there) and expressing frustration with BP....ie, blaming them while congratulating themselves....

So Obama is blaming BP?

Guess what?

That's because IT'S THEIR FAULT, YOU INCREDIBLE MORON!

This ecological disaster is 100% the fault of a private corporation and it's not the Government's job to clean up after some greedy corporate fatcats who couldn't be bothered to insall the auto cutoff that would have avoided this whole disaster.
 
the magnitude of harm....similar, but not the same

just look how severe you are saying it is....its good that we finally have you down to "well" they aren't similar....instead of your previous partisan nonsense

Right...one was caused by MOTHER NATURE...uncontrollable.

The OTHER was 110% TOTALLY MAN CAUSED and the responsibility to clean up lies with the corporation that caused this mess.
 
Haa! That's a laugh. This is the biggest pwnage in a debate since I debated Dixie on Macroevolution. Oncie has savaged your position point by bloody point. You've been pwned! LOL

Your opinion and .50 cents won't even get you a piece of penny candy, Mott. Saying so does not make it so in anyone's brain but your own.

Obama has tanked on showing even a modicum of concern and you screaming libtards wouldn't STFU about Katrina and how much lack of concern Bush showed for literally years.

Your man needs to show he's a president, not a stooge.
 
Who did Obama hire at BP?

what does that have to do with anything? but thanks for opening up this line of reasoning....by this logic, since both nagin and blanco are dems...well...

who has obama put in charge of this distaster? that is the question. you're desperately trying to deflect
 
Your opinion and .50 cents won't even get you a piece of penny candy, Mott. Saying so does not make it so in anyone's brain but your own.

Obama has tanked on showing even a modicum of concern and you screaming libtards wouldn't STFU about Katrina and how much lack of concern Bush showed for literally years.

Your man needs to show he's a president, not a stooge.

He hasn't shown that he is a president yet and chances are he never will. God help us.
 
Right...one was caused by MOTHER NATURE...uncontrollable.

The OTHER was 110% TOTALLY MAN CAUSED and the responsibility to clean up lies with the corporation that caused this mess.

i see....well then, all the feds and states can just do nothing...not responsible at all....feds never let them lease the rig, never had regulatory control....

you're funny, but keep spinning, this is getting good
 
So Obama is blaming BP?

Guess what?

That's because IT'S THEIR FAULT, YOU INCREDIBLE MORON!

This ecological disaster is 100% the fault of a private corporation and it's not the Government's job to clean up after some greedy corporate fatcats who couldn't be bothered to insall the auto cutoff that would have avoided this whole disaster.

if you actually take the time to read what we're talking about and what obama said and not simply jump at anyting yurt says....you would see we are talking about the CLEAN UP or SALVAGING the disaster, NOT WHAT CAUSED the distaster

i guess according to your logic, bush is not responsible at all because he didn't cause hurricane katrina...thanks!!!
 
what does that have to do with anything? but thanks for opening up this line of reasoning....by this logic, since both nagin and blanco are dems...well...

who has obama put in charge of this distaster? that is the question. you're desperately trying to deflect

Oh...I see. The fact that Bush appointed an inexperienced crony to a crucial position = Obama being a Dem, and Nagin being a Dem.

I'm not desperately trying to do anything. Mott is right on top of it; you have been pwnd in yet another man o' straw.
 
Back
Top