Obama: Operation desperate

LOL.

It must be very strange to be President Bush. A man of extraordinary vision and brilliance approaching to genius, he can’t get anyone to notice. He is like a great painter or musician who is ahead of his time, and who unveils one masterpiece after another to a reception that, when not bored, is hostile.
Click to expand...

John Hinderaker on George W. Bush, circa 2005.
 
I'm not attacking anything. Just giving people some background about John Hinderaker so that they can gauge whether he's worth reading at all. (Hint: He isn't.) I'm sure you love him, though.
 
General Buck Turgidson said:
I'm not attacking anything. Just giving people some background about John Hinderaker so that they can gauge whether he's worth reading at all. (Hint: He isn't.) I'm sure you love him, though.
Click to expand...

In other words, you are attacking him. This is your problem, you think that if someone once said something you disagree with that all of their future writing must be invalid. Which is pure partisan nonsense on your part. I don't even know who he is. I saw the article on RCP and posted the link. I can comment on the content of this article, which is amusing. Read what the Obama campaign is putting out to its potential donors... how can you not laugh at the desperation?
 
Superfreak said:
In other words, you are attacking him. This is your problem, you think that if someone once said something you disagree with that all of their future writing must be invalid. Which is pure partisan nonsense on your part. I don't even know who he is. I saw the article on RCP and posted the link. I can comment on the content of this article, which is amusing. Read what the Obama campaign is putting out to its potential donors... how can you not laugh at the desperation?
Click to expand...

Because Romney has not lead the national polls even once.

Because no one trusts Romney.

Because Romney can't get out of the way of his own missteps.

Because Romney and republicans continue to fire up Obama's base.

What desperation?
 
If you are running for president and your team is not desperate for every vote and every advantage... you should fire your team!
 
blackascoal said:
Because Romney has not lead the national polls even once.
Click to expand...

Incorrect...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...eral_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html#polls

Because no one trusts Romney.
Click to expand...

To the extent anyone would trust a politician, this is debatable. Given the failures of Obama to live up to his promises, who would trust him?

Because Romney can't get out of the way of his own missteps.
Click to expand...

Such as?

Because Romney and republicans continue to fire up Obama's base.
Click to expand...

on this we agree.... more so the fringe Reps who can't seem to keep their feet out of their mouths... but still, I agree.

What desperation?
Click to expand...

Last week, when I was in Iowa, voters told me they were feeling it. The numbers back it up: Our side is getting outspent 2-to-1 on the air there.
Click to expand...

So it’s a bad situation if 90 percent of them are false, negative attacks on us.

We’re losing this air war right now.
Click to expand...

Obama has outspent Romney to date. yet he is whining about losing the air wave battle and whining about the false ads being waged against him. the fact that he has spent more on false ads than Romney... just ignore that part.

I don’t have as much time to campaign this time as I did in 2008, so this whole thing is riding on you making it happen.
Click to expand...

This is not only humorous, but also reeks of desperation. 'I campaign and hold fundraisers more than any other President in the past, yet I don't have time... help me Obi Wan Kenobi, you're my only hope'...
 
General Buck Turgidson said:
So quoting someone is attacking them? Interesting.
Click to expand...

You are quoting something that has nothing to do with this article. You are trying to use the quote to negate what he has written in the article. So yes, that is attacking the source. You are saying 'see, look what he said once, this means nothing he ever says again should be discussed'
 
Superfreak said:
You are quoting something that has nothing to do with this article. You are trying to use the quote to negate what he has written in the article. So yes, that is attacking the source. You are saying 'see, look what he said once, this means nothing he ever says again should be discussed'
Click to expand...

The article is Hinderaker's opinion. I provided another of Hinderaker's opinions so that the reader can judge whether Hinderaker's opinion is something to value. If you love George W. Bush, then maybe you decide that John Hinderaker is a really smart guy with an incisive view of the world. So I don't see that the quote I posted would automatically negate anything at all.
 
General Buck Turgidson said:
The article is Hinderaker's opinion. I provided another of Hinderaker's opinions so that the reader can judge whether Hinderaker's opinion is something to value. If you love George W. Bush, then maybe you decide that John Hinderaker is a really smart guy with an incisive view of the world. So I don't see that the quote I posted would automatically negate anything at all.
Click to expand...

Yes, I stated clearly in the OP that it was an op-ed. So again, if someone has one opinion you do not like, you think it negates all other opinions they ever express in the future?

Again, you cannot address the actual article or any of its content. you instead try to demean the author. Which is typical of you. why are you afraid to address the content dung?
 
Superfreak said:
Incorrect...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...eral_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html#polls

To the extent anyone would trust a politician, this is debatable. Given the failures of Obama to live up to his promises, who would trust him?

Such as?

on this we agree.... more so the fringe Reps who can't seem to keep their feet out of their mouths... but still, I agree.

Obama has outspent Romney to date. yet he is whining about losing the air wave battle and whining about the false ads being waged against him. the fact that he has spent more on false ads than Romney... just ignore that part.

This is not only humorous, but also reeks of desperation. 'I campaign and hold fundraisers more than any other President in the past, yet I don't have time... help me Obi Wan Kenobi, you're my only hope'...
Click to expand...

Tell me that you're not just a partisan and you can discern events clearly.

Did you look at the averages of the polls that you posted? I don't think so.

Tell me that you are aware of Romney doing the crying .. if not, I can provide you with PLENTY of background for that if you need it.

Question: If Obama is such a failure, why isn't your candidate running away with the election?
 
Superfreak said:
Yes, I stated clearly in the OP that it was an op-ed. So again, if someone has one opinion you do not like, you think it negates all other opinions they ever express in the future?

Again, you cannot address the actual article or any of its content. you instead try to demean the author. Which is typical of you. why are you afraid to address the content dung?
Click to expand...


Here's the actual content:

[Snippet of Obama Email]

Neener Neener

*Repeat*
Click to expand...

I don't care to address the "actual content" because there really isn't any actual content. Hinderaker is hack that preaches to a hack-loving choir, of which you are apparently a member.

I'm just here to point out to the uninitiated what's going on: a guy who thinks George W. Bush was "a man of extraordinary vision and brilliance approaching to genius" dislikes Obama.
 
blackascoal said:
Tell me that you're not just a partisan and you can discern events clearly.

Did you look at the averages of the polls that you posted? I don't think so.
Click to expand...

Yes, did you look at your statement? You stated Romney had not led in the major polls. He has. Had you stated he has not led in the averages of the polls, I would have agreed with you. Words matter. :)

Tell me that you are aware of Romney doing the crying .. if not, I can provide you with PLENTY of background for that if you need it.
Click to expand...

I asked for references to his missteps that you mentioned. Can you provide those?

Question: If Obama is such a failure, why isn't your candidate running away with the election?
Click to expand...

Because he can't get any publicity. Gary Johnson would be a far better President than either Obama or Romney.
 
I think the "desperation" is the Republican Party falling apart at the seams because of their own stupidity. They have literally disenfranchised everyone with the exception of rich, white men and poor, dumb white hicks. Right now they're throwing anything and everything against the wall, hoping something sticks before another one of them opens their mouth and says something really, really, fucking stupid again.
 
blackascoal said:
Because Romney has not lead the national polls even once.

Because no one trusts Romney.

Because Romney can't get out of the way of his own missteps.

Because Romney and republicans continue to fire up Obama's base.

What desperation?
Click to expand...


Well see, that's the thing.

They re-post hate-filled op-ed pieces and then partisans can claim they have proof of this supposed "desperation" and spend the next 48 hours belittling Obama for it.

What they don't point out of course is that this supposed desperation is just one man's OPINION.

A man who also happens to be a partisan hack out for one thing, to destroy Obama any way possible.
 
Superfreak said:
You are quoting something that has nothing to do with this article. You are trying to use the quote to negate what he has written in the article. So yes, that is attacking the source. You are saying 'see, look what he said once, this means nothing he ever says again should be discussed'
Click to expand...


Well, since what he said previously is so astoundingly stupid, then yes, everything he has written since become suspect.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top