Obama=Liar & Puts american soldiers lives at risk

Southern Man said:
1. No response, you fat fucker?
2. Ditto.
3. Strawman.
4. Ditto, Fatso.
Click to expand...

1) Dear Bigot... it does not take a 'study' to understand the fact that 'queer' is a derogatory term

2) Dear Coward... please do us all a favor and just come out of the closet so that we don't have to put up with your over the top bashing of gay people any more.

3) Dear Bigot... again, look up the definition of a strawman. When I quote your exact words back to you, that is NOT creating a strawman.

4) Dear Coward.... do yourself a favor and stop cowering in fear of the 'gay' man. He is not going to get you. We promise.
 
Southern Man said:
You call it a logical conclusion, yet you offer no logical basis, while I have provided another alternate conclusion entirely consistent with my moral values. This makes you a liar, as well as brazenly fat. Now you infer something else but lack the courage to say it.
Click to expand...

Actually moron, I did say it. I think you are a closet homosexual who is afraid to come out of the closet because you were brought up to 'fear da gay man' and thus you are severely conflicted. Which explains why you lash out at gay men.
 
WinterBorn said:
He calls you a bigot based on your posts on this forum. I fail to see where his weight has any bearing at all on any of these discussions.

Since his initial insults were based on information in the posts and yours were insults aimed at him personally, he should also score massive points.

He did not bring his weight up and you brought your father up in this thread. So he should get massive points again.
Click to expand...

I think we must look closely at his insults... he is obviously obsessed with my figure and my ass, which is yet further evidence to back my conclusion that he is cowering in the closet. :)
 
Superfreak said:
1) Dear Bigot... it does not take a 'study' to understand the fact that 'queer' is a derogatory term

2) Dear Coward... please do us all a favor and just come out of the closet so that we don't have to put up with your over the top bashing of gay people any more.

3) Dear Bigot... again, look up the definition of a strawman. When I quote your exact words back to you, that is NOT creating a strawman.

4) Dear Coward.... do yourself a favor and stop cowering in fear of the 'gay' man. He is not going to get you. We promise.
Click to expand...
1. Translation: Fatso can't justify stating his opinion with facts.
2. Dear Ugly, why do you attempt to use "gay" an an insult?
3. Dear Fatso: look up the strawman logical fallacy in the link earlier provided, and learn it so you can stop embarrassing yourself.
4. Dear Ugly, decide which lie you are going to use and stick with it to avoid further embarrassment. Am I supposedly gay, or straight and supposedly afraid that a queer will "get me"?
 
Superfreak said:
Actually moron, I did say it. I think you are a closet homosexual who is afraid to come out of the closet because you were brought up to 'fear da gay man' and thus you are severely conflicted. Which explains why you lash out at gay men.
Click to expand...
I haven't lashed out at anyone, fatso.
 
Superfreak said:
I think we must look closely at his insults... he is obviously obsessed with my figure and my ass, which is yet further evidence to back my conclusion that he is cowering in the closet. :)
Click to expand...
No its just a convenient insult, but unlike yours actually has a basis.
 
Southern Man said:
1. Translation: Fatso can't justify stating his opinion with facts.
2. Dear Ugly, why do you attempt to use "gay" an an insult?
3. Dear Fatso: look up the strawman logical fallacy in the link earlier provided, and learn it so you can stop embarrassing yourself.
4. Dear Ugly, decide which lie you are going to use and stick with it to avoid further embarrassment. Am I supposedly gay, or straight and supposedly afraid that a queer will "get me"?
Click to expand...

1) Dear Moron, people don't do 'peer' reviewed studies of a word.

2) Dear dipshit, I have not used 'gay' as an insult. There is nothing wrong with someone being gay. That is the very point we are trying to convey to you.

3) Dear Bigot, the only strawmen on this thread are from you, which I continue to point out and you continue to hide from.

4) Dear Coward, as I stated, you do not have to fear the gay man. He is not coming for you.
 
Southern Man said:
http://globalministries.org/mee/from-war-to-peace/examination-of-biblical-justifications.html

My favorite: "I did not come to bring peace to the earth; I did not come to bring peace but a sword" (Matt. 10:34).
Click to expand...

Did you actually read the page you linked me to? Because it is an argument in favor of the point I made.

Your favorite was discussed this way:

"It is evident from the context of this verse that Jesus is speaking of "sword" metaphorically, not literally. In this passage of scripture Jesus is teaching of the difficulties of being his disciple. Loyalty to him will produce serious tensions even in the family of the disciple, causing a "sword" of division to separate a man from his father and a daughter from her mother. A parallel passage is found in Lk. 12:51 in which the word "sword" is replaced with "division". Jesus gave peace to his disciples (John 14:27, 16:33) but his peace is not one that frees disciples from rejection, persecution and conflict. The "sword" of which Jesus is speaking is not one Jesus seeks to place in the hands of his followers, but one that will be in the hands who oppose his disciples."


The entire link argues against christians on the battlefield.

Perhaps you should read it and follow it?
 
Southern Man said:
No its just a convenient insult, but unlike yours actually has a basis.
Click to expand...

what basis is that dear little bigot? Given that you have never met me... how do you know? Just admit your obsession stems from your blatant cry for help from the back of the closet and we shall help you come forth. You see most people are decent and are not as intolerant and bigoted as you.
 
Last edited:
WinterBorn said:
Did you actually read the page you linked me to? Because it is an argument in favor of the point I made.

Your favorite was discussed this way:

"It is evident from the context of this verse that Jesus is speaking of "sword" metaphorically, not literally. In this passage of scripture Jesus is teaching of the difficulties of being his disciple. Loyalty to him will produce serious tensions even in the family of the disciple, causing a "sword" of division to separate a man from his father and a daughter from her mother. A parallel passage is found in Lk. 12:51 in which the word "sword" is replaced with "division". Jesus gave peace to his disciples (John 14:27, 16:33) but his peace is not one that frees disciples from rejection, persecution and conflict. The "sword" of which Jesus is speaking is not one Jesus seeks to place in the hands of his followers, but one that will be in the hands who oppose his disciples."


The entire link argues against christians on the battlefield.

Perhaps you should read it and follow it?
Click to expand...


Be careful with your assumptions.... you assume he has the intellectual capacity to comprehend what he has read. A poor assumption considering the type of individual he has shown himself to be. Bigots typically are not very bright.
 
Southern Man said:
I haven't lashed out at anyone, fatso.
Click to expand...

Dear little bigot, when you tell a group of people who are willing to put their lives on the line for this country that they must hide their sexual preferences because bigots like you say that is what has to happen, you most certainly are lashing out at them. Telling them they must hide a part of who they are because it makes you feel better, telling them that if anyone finds out they will lose their job.... it is indeed lashing out in the most bigoted of manners.
 
Superfreak said:
Dear little bigot, when you tell a group of people who are willing to put their lives on the line for this country that they must hide their sexual preferences because bigots like you say that is what has to happen, you most certainly are lashing out at them. Telling them they must hide a part of who they are because it makes you feel better, telling them that if anyone finds out they will lose their job.... it is indeed lashing out in the most bigoted of manners.
Click to expand...
This.

A heterosexual soldier does not have to hide his spouse or girlfriend, or her boyfriend at the company/battalion picnic. A gay soldier does. A gay soldiers partner sacrifices as much as an Army Spouse when their loved one is away in a place of danger. Your attitude is there sacrifice does not matter the moment they are outted. That is the biggest bullshit idea to ever come out of your brain. Homosexual soldiers are deserving or every right, privileged and honor that they earn and who they fuck matters not a wit, when they give their lives for their country. HOOAH!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top