Obama Goes to War

Truth Detector

Well-known member
Contributor
After stumbling on his red line rhetoric on Syria, Obama, the inept hyper partisan buffoon that he is, slaps the face of Republicans whom he recently attempted to enlist in his foolish Syria foray.

Yes, Republicans are now the enemy; how dare they stand in the way of the uber buffoon's incredible efforts to spend vast sums of our money for failed leftist ideological policies and pandering to the clueless buffoons who elect and re-elect this idiot.

Obama has declared that he will NOT negotiate with Republicans. But he will negotiate with despots, dictators and despots who are known to prefer talk to war. :rolleyes:

Obama Goes to War
The President finds an enemy he's willing to bomb—Republicans.

President Obama likes to invoke his predecessors in the Oval Office, as all Presidents do, but in one sense he is unlike the others: Presidents traditionally try to reach a rough domestic consensus if they are faced with going to war abroad. Mr. Obama wants to smooth everything over abroad so he can get back to his favorite pursuit of declaring war at home.

At least that's how it's gone the last week, as Mr. Obama all but wrapped up that ghastly business in Syria and turned his attention to the real enemy—Republicans. Backed by the good offices of Vladimir Putin and the assurances of Bashar Assad, United Nations inspectors will now remove Syria's chemical weapons from the battlefield. Congress doesn't even have to vote on it, and the American people can forget the recent unpleasantness. Peace in our time.

Which means it's now safe for Mr. Obama to begin the war he really wants to fight. The President spoke Monday afternoon at the White House in remarks pegged to the fifth anniversary of the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the financial panic of 2008. But the financial crisis was merely an excuse for Mr. Obama's real purpose, which was to demand unconditional surrender from his domestic opposition.

Mr. Obama assailed Republicans for an "ideological agenda" that he called "the height of irresponsibility." Among other crimes against humanity, he said the GOP refuses to abandon the budget restraint of the sequester spending cuts or to greet the Affordable Care Act with flowers and sweets.

"Are they really willing to hurt people just to score political points? I hope not," Mr. Obama said, transparently suggesting that they do want to hurt people. At least he didn't accuse them of using chemical weapons, but when it comes to stopping atrocities like opposition to his domestic agenda, let him be clear: He doesn't do pinpricks.

........

Mr. Obama declares that he won't even deign to negotiate over an extension of the debt limit, which expires within a month or two. And he carpet-bombs Republicans only two weeks after House Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor took a political risk and declared they'd vote for the President's Syrian war resolution against the views of most of their own Members.

The evidence suggests that Mr. Obama wants a showdown with Congress that ends with a government shutdown or a dance with default. He can then mount an offensive against Republicans that will rally his base, which soured on his Syrian plans and vetoed Larry Summers for the Federal Reserve. With his domestic agenda dead on Capitol Hill, Mr. Obama may also figure that stigmatizing Republicans over a shutdown-default crisis is the only way that Democrats can retake the House in 2014.

The question is how well all of this will play with a war-weary public. Mr. Obama is no longer the fresh young idealist President, and Americans are beginning to figure out his methods. Like Assad and Mr. Putin, they may conclude that he's no longer a President whose words they can take seriously.


The entire article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...9081144245072978.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h
 
When he goes to war then that's when the right will have a credible argument against him. If in some way war is prevented than it's an unmistable sure thing that his credibility and popularity will rise. It won't rise with the tea party types because their priorities have nothing to do with preventing a war. They will hate him regardless of what he does.

but they will be further sidelined.
 
When he goes to war then that's when the right will have a credible argument against him. If in some way war is prevented than it's an unmistable sure thing that his credibility and popularity will rise. It won't rise with the tea party types because their priorities have nothing to do with preventing a war. They will hate him regardless of what he does.

but they will be further sidelined.

Apparently you did not read the article or cannot comprehend the premise of the thread; I cannot say I am surprised by this.

By the way, how old are you? It will assist me in comprehending your comments in the proper perspective.
 
Apparently you did not read the article or cannot comprehend the premise of the thread; I cannot say I am surprised by this.

By the way, how old are you? It will assist me in comprehending your comments in the proper perspective.

I didn't read the article and I don't read anything you post other than your racist ranting. I'm 13.
 
When he goes to war then that's when the right will have a credible argument against him. If in some way war is prevented than it's an unmistable sure thing that his credibility and popularity will rise. It won't rise with the tea party types because their priorities have nothing to do with preventing a war. They will hate him regardless of what he does.

but they will be further sidelined.

Hey clueless.....Reread the op and have someone explain to you what it is all about....
 
Back
Top